Cohen is Sentenced - Does it mean Mueller has NOTHING?

[h=1]BREAKING - National Enquirer just rolled on Trump - settled up with the feds,

admitted they quashed the story specifically to influence the election; there goes the John Edwards defense. :laugh:[/h]


 
Truth Detector said:
In any criminal case, isn't it common that when you have the goods on a witness and are trying to ensnare their boss, you typically wait to sentence them until AFTER they have testified on behalf of the prosecution?

What the Cohen sentence seems to mean to me, is that Mueller has NOTHING and got NOTHING from Cohen. Thoughts?
Click to expand...

Jarod said:
No
Click to expand...

Not a coherent answer; but then, being honest and coherent are not part of your DNA snowflake.
 
Jarod said:
Trump actually can go to prison for the campaign finance violations. They tried to put John Edwards in prison for basically the same thing, Jerry just did not agree based on those facts.
Click to expand...

Actually he can't. Can you cite ANY case that suggests you have the slightest clue of what you bloviate about?
 
Gunny2009 said:
Or he has already given them everything they need and are adding it to the pile for when they finish this
Click to expand...

Would he not be a key witness to be called on? He's been sentenced now, he can totally recant anything he might have said about Trump. THINK snowflake.
 
Truth Detector said:
What do you think it is? Once someone is sentenced, you have ZERO leverage. I see you are not only ignorant about economics, politics and facts, but also about how the real world works.

Tell me why someone would sentence anyone if there was a larger investigation going as the FAKE media and idiots like you suggest there is....ie. Trump?
Click to expand...


You hang on to that ... you maybe hungry in a few months :laugh:
 
Jarod said:
So using your logic, slashing your ex-wife’s throat with a knife only comes with a fine because the jury found O.J. Not-guilty?
Click to expand...

That is a moronic analogy snowflake. We are talking precedent, not wild eyed imaginary strawmen that you love to bloviate about.
 
This is a surprise and could spell bad omens for Flynn. As it seems to stand, it's absolutely mind boggling that it's suggested that Flynn is let off with no jail time! In his position, Flynn was the most guilty and in a normal apolitical situation, the death penalty could be legitimately under consideration.

However, Mueller/the FBI can see the gain in going easy on him and the downside of harsh punishment for a bloody war criminal, military General.

The lack of a prison sentence will play well with at least 90% of Americans! They can hope the judge doesn't rise above the bullshit politics and slap Flynn with something close to what he deserves for his treason.

Think of me as the messenger from Canada!
 
Jarod said:
My point, and you know it, is that just because a jury finds someone not guilty does not mean the alleged crime is only punishable by a fine.
Click to expand...

You fucking moron; we are talking election law here dunce. Good lord, you have to be the worlds shittiest attorney to make such moronic arguments. Judges must have laughed when you walked into the room.
 
Truth Detector said:
In any criminal case, isn't it common that when you have the goods on a witness and are trying to ensnare their boss, you typically wait to sentence them until AFTER they have testified on behalf of the prosecution?

What the Cohen sentence seems to mean to me, is that Mueller has NOTHING and got NOTHING from Cohen. Thoughts?
Click to expand...
basically yes,
Mueller fried some very small fish

that is all

nothing burger it is

:rofl2:
 
Jarod said:
History exists for the Justice department Prosecuting the crime When Democrats did it.
Click to expand...

The history suggests that when prosecuted for such crimes, a fine is all that results. What part of the OBVIOUS do you have such difficulty grasping. I know, make up another brain dead analogy about murderers.

giphy.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top