Another Bigoted Liberal Law Illegally Discriminating Against Only One Religion

Here is a bibliography of the Bibles I use in Internet discussions:

St. Joseph Edition of The New American Bible; Catholic book Publishing, NY; 1968 (Catholic)

The New American Bible; Thomas Nelson Inc, Nashville; 1971 (Catholic)

The Holy Bible King James Version; Thomas Nelson, Nashville: 1984 (Protestant)

The Holy Bible New International Version; Zondervan Bible Pub. Grand Rapids; 1978 (Non-demoninational)

The Scofield Reference Holy Bible (King James Version); Oxford Univ. Press; NY; 1909 (Protestant)

The Holy Scriptures Masoretic Text; Jewish Publ Society; Philadelphia: 1955 (Jewish)

The Holy Bible, St.Joseph Textbook Edition, Confraternity Version; Catholic book Publ: NY; 1963; (Catholic)

The Holy Bible Revised Berkeley Version; The Gideons Intrl; 1984; (Non-denominational Protestant)

The New American Catholic Edition of The Holy Bible; Benziger Bros, Boston; 1950 (Catholic)

The Old Testament; Guild Press NY; 1965 (Catholic)

The Living Bible; Holman Illustrated Edition: A.J. Holman Co; Philadelphia; 1973 (Protestant)

The Holy Bible; King James Version; The World Publ Co: Cleveland; (no date); (Protestant)

The Old Testament; Hebrew Publishing Co: NY; 1916 (English & Hebrew) (Jewish)



I will use only the ones that are Protestant or non-demoninational...and I will kick your ass from here to your Hell and back.

Start the thread...if you've got the balls.

Pick a subject!
 
My Christian Morals, and my rights as a citizen to practice my faith how I see fit. Why did you ask the judgement question this would not be judgement.

Wait, according to your belief in God and his Word gays can't get married....so are you saying two gays saying they're getting married means more to you than your faith? God said gays can't marry, right?
 
Why do you care what two secular gays say?

Because marriage is a Biblical institution, and Homosexuality is an abomination to God so as a Christian I should not participate in something that is an abomination and a sin. Personally I would have been fine with civil unions, in a way to say here have the same protections but leave marriage alone, and actually I would prefer they abstain from their sinful lust for the same sex.
 
Touchy, touchy, what would you like to discuss!

YOU PICKED THE TOPIC, WOLVERINE.

Jesus H. Christ...can't you keep up for even a few threads?

You claim I do not know the difference between what you call "the old covenant" and "the new covenant."

I am saying you are full of shit...and I am also saying that I almost certainly know more about the topic than you.

Start it in another thread, though...if you've got the balls. This is not the place for it.
 
Because marriage is a Biblical institution, and Homosexuality is an abomination to God so as a Christian I should not participate in something that is an abomination and a sin. Personally I would have been fine with civil unions, in a way to say here have the same protections but leave marriage alone, and actually I would prefer they abstain from their sinful lust for the same sex.

And...what about the part where you are instructed to put them to death?

Are you saying that because it is part of "the old covenant"...your god has changed its mind?

If so...where does your god say that it has changed its mind?

And, although it is impossible...let it be the god doing the talking...not John or Paul. (Sounds like half the fucking Beatles! Are there any biblical writings by someone named Ringo?)
 
Because marriage is a Biblical institution, and Homosexuality is an abomination to God so as a Christian I should not participate in something that is an abomination and a sin. Personally I would have been fine with civil unions, in a way to say here have the same protections but leave marriage alone, and actually I would prefer they abstain from their sinful lust for the same sex.

Yes, it is about the Bible, so why do you care when two people are obviously not christian want to have a civil ceremony?
 
Yes, it is about the Bible, so why do you care when two people are obviously not christian want to have a civil ceremony?

I believe that is between them and God. I really don't think God needs American Conservatives judging people here on Earth. If they are right married gay people will be judged by God. If they are wrong, they will be. Personally, I dont think it is any of my business either way.
 
I believe that is between them and God. I really don't think God needs American Conservatives judging people here on Earth. If they are right married gay people will be judged by God. If they are wrong, they will be. Personally, I dont think it is any of my business either way.

Preach it brother, I don't give a fuck. Beyond my pay grade.
 
YOU PICKED THE TOPIC, WOLVERINE.

Jesus H. Christ...can't you keep up for even a few threads?

You claim I do not know the difference between what you call "the old covenant" and "the new covenant."

I am saying you are full of shit...and I am also saying that I almost certainly know more about the topic than you.

Start it in another thread, though...if you've got the balls. This is not the place for it.

It is in the religion section!
 
If one is going to use biblical teachings about homosexuality...the part about putting them to death has to be included.

The "old covenant' "new covenant" argument is bullshit...unless someone wants to point out where in the supposed "new covenant" it says to ignore the wishes of the god of the Bible.
 
And...what about the part where you are instructed to put them to death?

Are you saying that because it is part of "the old covenant"...your god has changed its mind?

If so...where does your god say that it has changed its mind?

And, although it is impossible...let it be the god doing the talking...not John or Paul. (Sounds like half the fucking Beatles! Are there any biblical writings by someone named Ringo?)

The Bible was written under God’s inspiration over a period of 1,500 years or so through various periods where God dealt with his people in different ways. Not everything that the Bible designed for God’s people Israel under the judges or under the kings or that God designs for Christians under the apostles in the New Testament is the same. Putting to death adulterers, putting to death homosexuals, putting to death the sons who curse their parents, all these penalties belonged to a particular season in the history of God’s dealings with his covenant people, and those dealings have changed dramatically with the coming of God’s Son Jesus Christ into the world. That is the basic nature of the Bible and of redemptive history. It is like dietary laws Jesus says in the New Testament that it's not what goes into a mans mouth that defiles him but what comes out. Then there is the instance where God told Peter not to call anything uncleaan that God called clean!
 
The Bible was written under God’s inspiration over a period of 1,500 years or so through various periods where God dealt with his people in different ways. Not everything that the Bible designed for God’s people Israel under the judges or under the kings or that God designs for Christians under the apostles in the New Testament is the same. Putting to death adulterers, putting to death homosexuals, putting to death the sons who curse their parents, all these penalties belonged to a particular season in the history of God’s dealings with his covenant people, and those dealings have changed dramatically with the coming of God’s Son Jesus Christ into the world. That is the basic nature of the Bible and of redemptive history. It is like dietary laws Jesus says in the New Testament that it's not what goes into a mans mouth that defiles him but what comes out.

Ummm...what about the part where your god is so offended by homosexuality...that he commands you to put them to death?

Do you follow that part? If not...why not?

Then there is the instance where God told Peter not to call anything uncleaan that God called clean!

Yup. That comes just a few passages after Jesus mentioned that he was not here to change any of the law...not a word, nor a letter, nor a stroke of a letter.

So...about that killing homosexuals.

Are you saying your god was wrong there?
 
Because marriage is a Biblical institution, and Homosexuality is an abomination to God so as a Christian I should not participate in something that is an abomination and a sin. Personally I would have been fine with civil unions, in a way to say here have the same protections but leave marriage alone, and actually I would prefer they abstain from their sinful lust for the same sex.

Thank you for your incredibly stupid and unchristian opinion.

Those so-called protections that you're fine with didn't exist for heterosexual marriage before. And, they're not "protections" but rather the state-empowerment to victimize others, to force them to support homosexual acts and to engage in homosexual activities (such as producing homosexual art). Only shithead libs think freedom comes from the government.

Same-sex "marriage" is better than Civil Unions because with Civil Unions libbies would always cry about being oppressed, even if they had all the same "protections." "Why can't we be married" they'd always chant. Also, "Civil Unions" and its "Partners" would further corrupt society because these terms would always be used alongside traditional terms, giving homos constant and explicit billing. Not to mention that you ever referred to your business "partner", people would think you're a faggot.

One of the most shitty things fake Christians do is blame the Bible for their opposition to same-sex marriage. Is your goal to teach the public that the Bible is "homophobic"? Do you have no concept of morality? Homosexual acts are immoral. The state has no interest in encouraging such destructive behavior. The state has an interest to encouraging traditional marriage to reduce welfare costs.
 
Ummm...what about the part where your god is so offended by homosexuality...that he commands you to put them to death?

Do you follow that part? If not...why not?



Yup. That comes just a few passages after Jesus mentioned that he was not here to change any of the law...not a word, nor a letter, nor a stroke of a letter.

So...about that killing homosexuals.

Are you saying your god was wrong there?

All these penalties belonged to a particular season in the history of God’s dealings with his covenant people, Just because he doesn't now want death, doesn't mean he condones it, the word you are looking for is grace and all will be judged for their life when they die!

You forgot that Jesus himself said it is not what goes into a mans mouth that defiles him but what comes out.
 
Thank you for your incredibly stupid and unchristian opinion.

Those so-called protections that you're fine with didn't exist for heterosexual marriage before. And, they're not "protections" but rather the state-empowerment to victimize others, to force them to support homosexual acts and to engage in homosexual activities (such as producing homosexual art). Only shithead libs think freedom comes from the government.

Same-sex "marriage" is better than Civil Unions because with Civil Unions libbies would always cry about being oppressed, even if they had all the same "protections." "Why can't we be married" they'd always chant. Also, "Civil Unions" and its "Partners" would further corrupt society because these terms would always be used alongside traditional terms, giving homos constant and explicit billing. Not to mention that you ever referred to your business "partner", people would think you're a faggot.

One of the most shitty things fake Christians do is blame the Bible for their opposition to same-sex marriage. Is your goal to teach the public that the Bible is "homophobic"? Do you have no concept of morality? Homosexual acts are immoral. The state has no interest in encouraging such destructive behavior. The state has an interest to encouraging traditional marriage to reduce welfare costs.

. Of course not, I side with the Bible however we live in a secular world so protect marriage, let them call it something else they will never be married in God's eyes.
 
Back
Top