Trump will likely be indicted

Moderating and censorship have a natural appeal to commies. Why debate, when you can just force your point?


Trump has been quite vocal about stifling the press and who can ask questions at his press conferences.

It is a stupid slur to say the media are “the enemy of the people.” Coming from the president of the United States, it is also irresponsible and chilling.

Think Stalin or Hitler............
 
Moderating and censorship have a natural appeal to commies. Why debate, when you can just force your point?

Come on over to the APP side of the forum and help break the silence treatment the garden slugs still think will work on me. We'll quickly see who can debate and who caan't when you're prohibited from taking your cheap shots.
 
How is that a problem in reference to what i said?

Even though you are only partially right while being wrong in theory. That theory would be that Trump knows he must care some for the good of the GOP for the sake of saving his own hide.

I must say, I like the way the forum is going right now with the biggest abusers of civility keeping their ugly cakeholes shut. Sure would be nice to see a bit of moderating happening to make the point?
What would you like the moderators to do, exactly? The owner believes in freedom of speech, we only limit it in very rare instances.
 
I responded to your opening post in post 2.

The left is only going after Trump for one reason, it doesn't matter what topic, charge, or allegation. They are after Trump for kicking Hillary's ass in 2016. It is a fight to the death.


That's absurd.. Face it.. the country doesn't like having a stupid, crude, lying bully in the WH.
 
E=Phantasmal;2759001]What would you like the moderators to do, exactly? The owner believes in freedom of speech, we only limit it in very rare instances.[/QUOTE]

Well really? In your view hasn't this forum's members far exceeded freedom of speech and taken the ugliness, profanity, insults, and in general childish behaviour, too far?

I'm not into a public debate with you. If you want to discuss my feelings about this forum then contact bluedream and maybe he/she will include you in what I'm trying to do.
 
Trump has been quite vocal about stifling the press ... blah, blah, blah.

Trump does not condemn "the press", but he rightfully craps all over the "fake news". Quit trying to pull a fast one.

Lefties rely upon obscuring the line between a free press and the fake news, just as they need to obscure the line between illegal immigrants and legal immigrants.
 
E=Phantasmal;2759001]What would you like the moderators to do, exactly? The owner believes in freedom of speech, we only limit it in very rare instances.

Well really? In your view hasn't this forum's members far exceeded freedom of speech and taken the ugliness, profanity, insults, and in general childish behaviour, too far?

I'm not into a public debate with you. If you want to discuss my feelings about this forum then contact bluedream and maybe he/she will include you in what I'm trying to do.[/QUOTE]
Lol, good luck, many have tried, many have failed. It’s honorable, I give you that.
 
Trump does not condemn "the press", but he rightfully craps all over the "fake news". Quit trying to pull a fast one.

Lefties rely upon obscuring the line between a free press and the fake news, just as they need to obscure the line between illegal immigrants and legal immigrants.

Yes he does condemn the press calling them the enemy of the people.. He's used the press and played to them for 40 years..... He's trash.. Nick Ayers wouldn't go near him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Ayers
 
Well really? In your view hasn't this forum's members far exceeded freedom of speech and taken the ugliness, profanity, insults, and in general childish behaviour, too far?

I'm not into a public debate with you. If you want to discuss my feelings about this forum then contact bluedream and maybe he/she will include you in what I'm trying to do.
Lol, good luck, many have tried, many have failed. It’s honorable, I give you that.[/QUOTE]

Well, thanks for the wishes of good luck! But the truth is that I've already succeeded. But that's all I can say about it in fairness.
 
Yes he does condemn the press calling them the enemy of the people..

Looks like you feel the need to obscure the line between a free press and fake news.

Trump does not condemn "the press", but he rightfully craps all over the "fake news". Quit trying to pull a fast one.

Lefties rely upon obscuring the line between a free press and the fake news, just as they need to obscure the line between illegal immigrants and legal immigrants.
 
Come on over to the APP side of the forum and help break the silence treatment the garden slugs still think will work on me. We'll quickly see who can debate and who caan't when you're prohibited from taking your cheap shots.

What is the app side?
 
Looks like you feel the need to obscure the line between a free press and fake news.

Trump does not condemn "the press", but he rightfully craps all over the "fake news". Quit trying to pull a fast one.

Lefties rely upon obscuring the line between a free press and the fake news, just as they need to obscure the line between illegal immigrants and legal immigrants.
Lol, the only problem with that is he feels most all the news reported about him “fake news”

The Fake News is working overtime. Just reported that, despite the tremendous success we are having with the economy & all things else, 91% of the Network News about me is negative (Fake). Why do we work so hard in working with the media when it is corrupt? Take away credentials?"

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/05/09/politics/donald-trump-media-tweet/index.html
 
Funny, don't DEMOCRATS recall their own guidelines?


Date of Issuance: Monday, October 16, 2000

The indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions.

Updated July 9, 2014

https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president’s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution


Remind me who was infesting the Oval Office on October 16, 2000, and July 9, 2014.
 
Funny, don't DEMOCRATS recall their own guidelines?


Date of Issuance: Monday, October 16, 2000

The indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions.

Updated July 9, 2014

https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/sitting-president’s-amenability-indictment-and-criminal-prosecution


Remind me who was infesting the Oval Office on October 16, 2000, and July 9, 2014.

Maybe you can point to the passage in the Constitution that prohibits a sitting president from being indicted?
 
Maybe you can point to the passage in the Constitution that prohibits a sitting president from being indicted?

Maybe you should have asked Janet Reno and Eric Holder when that document was created and updated during DEMOCRAT Administrations, cum gargler.
 
Back
Top