Another Bigoted Liberal Law Illegally Discriminating Against Only One Religion

[Ross Dolan]

Since you won't let this diversionary BS go, I will accommodate your need to embarrass yourself and then move on.

-Jesus doesn't specifically condemn pedophilia, bestiality, or rape. According to your logic, that means he supported all of these things.

NO IT DOESN'T. It simply means he did not condemn them. Not condemning something does not mean you support it.

I hope your logic gets a little better as you move on.

-Jesus identified the Old Testament as the literal Word of God (e.g., Matt 22:43), identified it as infallible (John 10:35) and it specifically condemned homosexuality as an abomination (Lev 18:22; 20:13). Jesus also confirmed that him offering a new perspective on God in no way implies that the old one is invalidated. Matthew 5:17: “Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill.”

Jesus H. Christ, Arminius...you are not going in this direction. You've got to be smarter than that. Are you actually saying that...

"If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them shall be
put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their
lives." Leviticus 20:13

...

...is where Christians are supposed to be?

-His apostles emphatically condemned homosexuality (Rom 1:26–27; 1 Cor 6:9–10; 1 Tim 1:9–10).

"Apostles" is plural...but you only offered quotes from ONE apostle...the late-comer, Paul. And Paul condoned slavery. (1 Timothy 6:1ff; Colossians 3:22; Colossians 4:1; Titus 2:9; 1 Corinthians 7:17ff.) As did Jesus, as you mentioned in Matthew 5:17ff.

-In condemning divorce, Jesus identified marriage as being between one man and one woman: In Matthew 19, he stated: “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.”

NOT ONE WORD SPECIFICALLY CONDEMNING HOMOSEXUALITY.

Which is what I said.

So again, your diversion of acting like Christianity doesn't actually oppose homosexuality, and that this falsehood somehow legitimizes violating the religious beliefs of Christians (and only Christians) holds zero water. But by all means, continue talking crap and acting like a pontificating douche.

Now we are cooking with gas.

I said that Jesus said not one word specifically condemning homosexuality...and I am correct.

Why not just acknowledge that I am...rather than all this bullshit?

 

[artichoke]

Do civil ceremonies marry you in the eyes of God? This is a yes or no question.

I refer you to the answer I gave you the last twelve times you asked.

 

[kudzu]

In my workplace, we accommodate certain Christians by not forcing them to work on Sundays. Your whiney little theory falls apart there, doesn't it dumbfuck?

I realize it's anathema to you, but try to do the tiniest bit of homework on discrimination laws before you continue to embarrass yourself, cunt.

You won't, however. The best you uninformed little twats can do is rant on about your victimhood. All the while, demonstrating your incredible and willful ignorance on anti-discrimination and civil rights laws. It's nothing less than amazing that there are simpletons as stupid as you that fail to grasp those very simple concepts.

But, Bible study does take precedence in homeschool, doesn't it, Jethro?

He's competing for victim status with blacks, homosexuals, Muslims etc.........

 

[domer76]

Translation: If any accommodation exists anywhere for Christianity, then it must be automatically invalid to point out that only Christians have to violate their beliefs to not be rendered second-class citizens.

"Translation".

When you begin to understand simple concepts, twat, you can then begin to "translate". Until then, it's probably best for you to shut the fuck up and stop publicly embarrassing yourself.

But you won't. Shitstains like you don't know when to STFU and continue to demonstrate your massive ignorance.

It is amusing to watch, however.

 

[kudzu]

Do civil ceremonies marry you in the eyes of God? This is a yes or no question.

Before marriage was ever a religious sacrament it was a contract ........ Still is in US law.

 

[Lightbringer]

I refer you to the answer I gave you the last twelve times you asked.

No you didn't. Yes or No?

 

[domer76]

He's competing for victim status with blacks, homosexuals, Muslims etc.........

He's already outpaced that.

 

[Ross Dolan]

I ask again...is a civil ceremony a marriage in the eyes of God?

Yes.

The sacrament of marriage has as its "ordinary minister" the husband and wife.

A minister is not necessary at all for the religious aspect.

 

[Lightbringer]

If I had my way I'd put Christians in ovens and be done with you. I'm not trolling, I mean it.

 

[Adolf_Twitler]

Unlike you, I'm a human being not a 2nd class faggot. Isn't that right, boy?

Yes, you are ALMOST right, AS you are actually a 1st class faggot! Blahahahaha!

 

[domer76]

Their attorney said they're artists, but that's beside the point.

Libs won the battle against gay marriage, but you can't just win gracefully, you must PUNISH those who dare to step out of line?

Artists?

They make fucking wedding invitations. Know why he used the term "artist"? Because it worked in the case of that Colorado cake baker who referred to himself as an artist.

Don't piss on our legs and try to tell us it's raining.

 

[reagansghost]

Um, sure.

you better fear death

I'll give ya some details..........if you spend this lifetime hating a minority or multiple minorities, you're reborn into the exact same conditions they suffer

in other words all your hatred for those abused, by human scum just like you, blows right back in your face

good luck

 

[Lightbringer]

you better fear death

I'll give ya some details..........if you spend this lifetime hating a minority or multiple minorities, you're reborn into the exact same conditions they suffer

in other words all your hatred for those abused, by human scum just like you, blows right back in your face

good luck

Stop, you don't believe that for a second.

 

[Truth Detector]

You have it wrong. You do know you don't have to open your doors to the public?

As a citizen, EVERYONE has a right to operate a business WITH the public. The PUBLIC are your customers. YOU, like the leftist morons here, are confusing PUBLIC for GOVERNMENT.

 

[Truth Detector]

I think gays, Muslims and blacks should have the same rights that you have.

How do they not?

 

[reagansghost]

Stop, you don't believe that for a second.

I certainly do

 

[Lightbringer]

As a citizen, EVERYONE has a right to operate a business WITH the public. The PUBLIC are your customers. YOU, like the leftist morons here, are confusing PUBLIC for GOVERNMENT.

No I'm not. If you only want to deal with certain people you can do so, and never open your doors to the public.

 

[Truth Detector]

Why not? God rules civil services?

Wrong again; a civil ceremony is the Governments attempt to involve themselves in our lives and extract payment for such. A religious ceremony is the only valid form of marriage and that is under the eyes of God and witnesses to that commitment made between a man and a woman. It is a necessary and important component to civilized human endeavors.

Once again you confuse Government with PUBLIC.

 

[Lightbringer]

I certainly do

No, you don't, and everyone who has read your posts knows it.

 

[reagansghost]

Wrong again; a civil ceremony is the Governments attempt to involve themselves in our lives and extract payment for such. A religious ceremony is the only valid form of marriage and that is under the eyes of God and witnesses to that commitment made between a man and a woman. It is a necessary and important component to civilized human endeavors.

Once again you confuse Government with PUBLIC.

So Chevron's CEO should swear in the POTUS?