‘There is NO GOD’ Stephen Hawking’s final revelation of the afterlife REVEALED

Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

Incomplete definition, but this characteristic is part of agnostic belief.

Fine I have no problem with this part.

This is the argument of ignorance fallacy.

I just did.

There is no such thing as a 'loaded' syllogism.

Calculus is a branch of mathematics, not logic. Redefinition fallacy. Your logic is also flawed, due to the argument of ignorance fallacy in your argument.

No doubt!

I didn't bother reading this....
 
History is not a proof. It simply is.

The term 'NAZI', when translated into English, means National Socialist German Workers. It is SOCIALISM, dude. Fascism is one of two forms of socialism, the other being communism.
Socialism can only exist by stealing wealth from others. Hitler did it too. Capitalism is the only system that creates wealth out of nothing.

Once again. That is completely incorrect. Wrong. The Nazi's were far right.
 
Once again. That is completely incorrect. Wrong. The Nazi's were far right.

Agreed substance over form. They could call themselves the zionist party and still that wouldn't change the fact that the gassed Jews, poles, romani, homosexuals or other "undesirables."
 
Once again. That is completely incorrect. Wrong. The Nazi's were far right.

sorry but that is ignorant......they have nothing at all in common with modern American conservatives......they share far more beliefs about the role of government with American demmycrats and socialists.....the only difference is they want the government to take control of business by force instead of legislation....
 
M #807

Too bad. I'd hoped for more than a 3 hp IQ. Psychologist Joy Browne is right. "Disappointment is a function of expectation." JB PhD
 
sorry but that is ignorant......they have nothing at all in common with modern American conservatives......they share far more beliefs about the role of government with American demmycrats and socialists.....the only difference is they want the government to take control of business by force instead of legislation....

Nazis have nothing to do with modern American conservatives. At all. If it came across that way, it was misunderstood. There is no American political leaning in this country (Left, Right, Middle) that could ever be compared with the Nazi's. The careless use of this comparison in politics astounds me.
 
Nazis have nothing to do with modern American conservatives. At all. If it came across that way, it was misunderstood. There is no American political leaning in this country (Left, Right, Middle) that could ever be compared with the Nazi's. The careless use of this comparison in politics astounds me.

I disagree in degrees. Obviously there is nothing like in US right wing politics that compares to the Nazis in acts, but there are things their leaders say that are the same. It is not for nothing that American Nazi Party is attracted to Donald J Trump.
He is like catnip to them. And by the same token there is some similarity in thought of the far radical left as to confiscation of property and elimination of property rights that echo Lenin. And that is not to say the left has attempted a 1918 or 1921? style coup de etat

So I both agree and disagree with you, I guess.

The scary thought is that the thoughts might actually matter, and all that is lacking is a person to go Fuhrer on us all. Read the famous Milgram experiment as to why the
German population is not alone in this all too human propensity for violence, well not just violence but sociopathic cuelty.
 
"On the shoulders of this giant, they stand!" M #813
President Trump is such a towering intellect, you can see his shoes in his driver's license photo. Trump towers many Ångströms above both his peers.
 
President Trump is such a towering intellect, you can see his shoes in his driver's license photo. Trump towers many Ångströms above both his peers.

I am hopeful there enough nevertrump deep state people thwarting him that we survive.
 
It is not the job of atheists to disprove god.
Well, they shouldn't be attempting to do so, anyway... That would make them fundamentalists of their religion.

It is the function of an advocate to convince people there is one and we should join their church.
No, it is not. Sure, believers would like unbelievers to believe and enjoy the same benefits that they enjoy, but in the end, if I were to attempt proving my religion to you, I would be a fundamentalist (committing the circular argument fallacy).

I am not trying to convince you to leave your church because it is a scam. It is, but you are an insider who has swallowed all the propaganda.
Circular Argument Fallacy (fundamentalism). You can't prove that religion is a scam. This claim of yours is also self refuting because you yourself are practicing a religion [and are a fundamentalist of it] (atheism).

A fictional being
That's your belief...

cannot be disproven.
Correct, god(s) can't be disproven. They can't be proven either. Religion is an open functional system.

They leave no tracks, don't have a body and only exist in the minds of believers.
What do you mean by "no tracks"? ... Depends on which god(s) we're speaking about... False... they also exist in books, and may or may not exist in the same "reality" that you and I exist in.

Perhaps an MRI?
The "mind" and the "brain" are not synonymous.

But since they do not exist,
Circular Argument Fallacy (fundamentalism).

there is no evidence possible.
False. There is plenty of supporting evidence for god(s). For the Christian God, the Holy Bible is evidence. Prayers being answered is evidence. Those evidences just happen to not convince you.

Show me proof that the easter Bunny is not real. Not just the knowledge, but solid evidence. He leaves chocolate eggs.
I don't have proof of it, but I have what I feel is good supporting evidence that the Easter Bunny does not exist in reality.
 
Back
Top