God damn Indians and Democrats

False argument.
Undefined term.
Dictionaries interpret and translate words for common use.
No, they do not. They do not translate words. They do not interpret words. They do not define words. They standardize spelling and pronunciation of words and give examples of their use (often wrong!).
No, they are not .. thus the hundreds of years we've spent arguing the two.
A democracy has no constitution. It is rule by majority. A republic has a constitution. It is rule by law. That protects the minority opinion. A republic is not a government of men, but of law.
That's not true. It's simply your interpretation of what a democracy is .. which by the way, comes in various forms.
Only one. A democracy is rule by majority. It has no constitution.
At the end of this discussion, whenever that comes, we will still be considered both .. and for good reason.
The two forms of government are mutually exclusive. The United States is not democracy. It is a federated republic.
 
What would be the functional part of your argument? What difference does it make?
Constitutions respect minority opinion as well as majority opinion. None can overrule the other.
Does the sudden awareness that we're a 'republic' change how we operate and govern?
No. The United States has always been a federated republic.
The United States is considered the greatest democracy in the world.
The United States is not a democracy. There are no surviving democracies anywhere in the world.
What difference does you calling it a republic actually make?
The constitution.
 
Undefined term.

No, they do not. They do not translate words. They do not interpret words. They do not define words. They standardize spelling and pronunciation of words and give examples of their use (often wrong!).

A democracy has no constitution. It is rule by majority. A republic has a constitution. It is rule by law. That protects the minority opinion. A republic is not a government of men, but of law.

Only one. A democracy is rule by majority. It has no constitution.

The two forms of government are mutually exclusive. The United States is not democracy. It is a federated republic.

It doesn't make any difference how many times you say the same thing. It's wrong, just your biased interpretation.

As I've said, and you didn't challenge, democracy comes in various forms.

Ever heard of a constitutional democracy?

Exactly who made you the national wordsmith?
 
The problem with that is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_disenfranchisement

They don't ALWAYS disqualify themselves, and you boneheads are on a crusade to register anything with(or without)a pulse. And we as republicans really would like to disqualify ANYONE, minority or not, who does not meet the requirements to participate in our electoral process.

I think this sums up the conservative position pretty well...douche nozzle(sorry for the incivility there, maybe we can be nicer to each other when the election is over)

How do North Dakota Native Americans not qualify to vote?
 
You already used this definition. I agree with it. The United States it not organized as a democracy. It is organized as a federated republic. The supreme power of the government lies in a constitution, not people.

Such utter horseshit. Any authority a constitution may have comes from the people.
 
A common definition of "democracy" is, "Government by the people, exercised either directly or through elected representatives" — we are that,

"Government of the People, by the People, for the People."

But this joker will deny that Lincoln said any such thing. He's trolling.
 
It doesn't make any difference how many times you say the same thing. It's wrong, just your biased interpretation.

As I've said, and you didn't challenge, democracy comes in various forms.

Ever heard of a constitutional democracy?

Exactly who made you the national wordsmith?

There is no such thing as constitutional democracy. Democracies have no constitution. A constitutional form of government is a republic.
 
"She deserved it."

The mindfuck revealed.

No, she deserved it. She is going around claiming that some microbit of her DNA is Indian. It's a ridiculous argument. She and the press are making a big deal out of it. It's a ridiculous argument. Trump is just making fun of it. They deserve it.
 
Back
Top