Mason Michaels
Verified User
You are clueless about racism.......I'm not surprised though.
I know there is white racism and it's wrong!
You want a pass on black racism!
But that's wrong too!
You are clueless about racism.......I'm not surprised though.
You're a victim of your racism
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
You sure you want to let that post out into the sphere?
I couldn't disagree more!
Honestly, who cares what you think?
The Weinstein claims, like the claims here, were basically he-said/she-said claims. There wasn't supporting physical evidence, etc. Republicans were eager to believe, even when just the first few came out, because Weinstein was a well-known liberal. Now they'd like to impose a totally different standard, because it's one of their boys.
In what sense do you think Dems have abused this? Three women have each come forward, of their own accord, and accused Kavanaugh of serious sexual misconduct against them. One has agreed to testify about it under oath. Another has signed a sworn affidavit. What are the Democrats supposed to do, in your mind? Should they say "sorry -- unless you've got hard evidence, we have no interest in hearing your story"?
I know there is white racism and it's wrong!
You want a pass on black racism!
But that's wrong too!
What Black racism and it's laws are resulting in millions of white men being locked up in prison?
Be specific, I'll wait.
Right back at you!
I know there is white racism and it's wrong!
You want a pass on black racism!
But that's wrong too!
YOU care........you keep coming for me and I'm not sending for you.
You definitely care. You don't like me calling out racist white men...or racist whites period.
You actually think Blacks are equally as racist......which is equally absurd.
At the end of the day it's about ignorance. Ignorance isn't limited to a certain race, ethnicity, gender or political beliefs. And TTQ64 is ignorant.
Because of tribalism she's going to get support like she is right now from other posters because it's a team thing and you must always protect the team.
Black people who attack whites,because they are white.
Black who use white racism as a reason to justify their own racism toward whites.
The Feinstein timing. the high powered Dems running Ford. ( Katz /Fallon) .The Weinstein claims, like the claims here, were basically he-said/she-said claims. There wasn't supporting physical evidence, etc. Republicans were eager to believe, even when just the first few came out, because Weinstein was a well-known liberal. Now they'd like to impose a totally different standard, because it's one of their boys.
In what sense do you think Dems have abused this? Three women have each come forward, of their own accord, and accused Kavanaugh of serious sexual misconduct against them. One has agreed to testify about it under oath. Another has signed a sworn affidavit. What are the Democrats supposed to do, in your mind? Should they say "sorry -- unless you've got hard evidence, we have no interest in hearing your story"?
At the end of the day it's about ignorance. Ignorance isn't limited to a certain race, ethnicity, gender or political beliefs. And TTQ64 is ignorant.
Because of tribalism she's going to get support like she is right now from other posters because it's a team thing and you must always protect the team.
Reality,there are white and black racist.
I have no issue with you calling out any and all racism,no matter who.
The Feinstein timing.
the high powered Dems running Ford.
The Dems were out beating the bushes for accusers.
But I know a politicization when I see it
Please don't deflect answer the question. This is you're discussion..back your shit up.
"What Black racism and it's laws are resulting in millions of white men being locked up in prison".
Be specific, I'll wait.
seriously? after the hearings (pig circus) and just before a vote is scheduled she decides to realese a months old letter?What about it?
you do know who Deborah Katz is?In what sense is anyone "running Ford"?
no. the 65 women were NOT organized by Republicans. they self organized.Wouldn't you, in their shoes? The guy is a potential lifetime appointee, who has been accused of serious sexual misconduct by one credible woman (and now two other women have come forward), so doesn't it make sense that they'd want to see if there's a pattern of such claims that would turn this from a he-said/she-said situation into something more convincing? It's the mirror image of the way the Republicans have been beating the bushes looking for women willing to speak well of Kavanaugh.
glad you admit this is all about looking to stop Judge K. since they can't so it any other way...With Weinstein, it took years from the first rumors floating around until it was publicly understood what a monster he was. With Kavanaugh, we don't have years to allow it to bubble up organically. We need to actively stir the pot to see what floats to the top, because the Republicans are in a god-awful hurry to be done with it. Yet, even as they try to rush this thing to a close, they whine endlessly about the active role Democrats are taking in trying to make sure that any victims who may be out there speak up before it's too late.
Grassley has bent over backwards to accommodate the politicizationThen surely you recognized how these allegations are being politicized by the Republicans in an effort to get people to disbelieve the women, so they can push their boy through.