Wrong.
Only two of the 65 women who vouched for Kavanaugh stand by him after accuser comes forward
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/two-65-women-vouched-kavanaugh-stand-accuser-comes-forward/
Kavanaugh is about to get the Merick Garland treatment!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Wrong.
Only two of the 65 women who vouched for Kavanaugh stand by him after accuser comes forward
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/two-65-women-vouched-kavanaugh-stand-accuser-comes-forward/
In order to not believe her.... You must believe that she made this story up back in 2012, then went to a therapist and talked about it... hoping to create a record, but failing to mention his name, then created no other trail. Sorry that sounds like believing Obama's mother made a fake birth announcement in the Hawaii news paper hoping that he could become president some day.
Wrong. The story said 2 dozen of the women did not respond to the media and 2 of the women did not want to talk to the media...can't blame them.
Getin the ring
Verified User
yup, your braindead, every post you make it's some fantasy you dreamed last night and bring it to us.
rebrand myself? wtf is wrong with you, you must have a little pin-head and pimples.
let me explain something you're missing.
we listened to you nut bags for months leading up to the election,
Hillary is going to win, no way Trump will be president, much to the same assurance you are giving us now.
then we've listened to how Stormy Daniels was going to Bring Trump down, then how Mueller was going to bring him down,
Then Manafort turning on trump, nail in the coffin you said.
Now, because Frankenstein and CNN told you to sit up and bark, your off on another fantasy, 35 years ago in high school Kavanagh attacked a classmate.
And you're jumping up and down like you did when you first wee-weed in the big boy potty.
your schtick is up nut-bag, you're a triggered non player, like your buddies on this forum.
Your Trolls
And she couldn't remember where the house was, what it looked like, exactly what year was and who all the guys were at the party.
Didn't respond!?!?!?!?!?!?!
So that should be your first clue that it's suspicious.
Why wouldn't they respond to something they put their name to?
Because they didn't put their name to it! Their names were forged.
Getin the ring
Verified User
give it time, why are so anxious to make a fool of yourself, on record.
And If I was one of these women I'd hesitate to sit up and bark like I was told also.
I signed the letter, not interested in the talk show circuit.
you see conservatives aren't the ones who've lost their minds, it's the nut-bags that are whining at the moon
NEXT
It's not a fantasy or dream that Trump's personal attorney, Trump's campaign chairman, Trump's campaign chair #2, Trump's National Security Adviser, and one of Trump's Campaign Foreign Policy Advisers all pleaded guilty and are cooperating.
The fantasy exists in your mind, that none of this has anything to do with Trump's trouble with Russia.
So then for any child who accuses a Priest of sexual assault, they must remember every detail of the event otherwise their claim is false?
With time, I expect the other two to retract their support.
You're not going to get more supporters at this point from this phony list of 65 women.
That's why they should all be subpoenaed. Because it seems like Grassley forged this document.
LOL!
Everyone take a second and think about this...
These women supposedly signed a document (even though no signatures appear on the document) professing their public affection for Brett. PUBLIC. They put their names on this doc that was clearly intended for public consumption. So if they're now saying they don't want to publicly address the public action they took on a public document, then that should send up a big red flag for you.
So they're interested in supporting Brett, but not interested in defending why?
That makes me think the whole thing is fishy.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
You would think a psychologist would.
This is very easily settled:
Call forth the 65 women who signed (but didn't because it has no signatures) that letter of support for Brett, and have them testify under oath when they approached by Grassley and/or the GOP to "sign" (again, no signatures on the document, so no one signed anything) onto this doc. From there, we get an idea of when the GOP found out about this accusation, and the length of time they've been covering it up.
I'm nearly 100% certain Grassley forged that document.
DId she remember what color nail polish she had on?
I wouldn't have bothered with the media either.
She wasn't a little kid. She was 15 at a teenage party. geesh
Here's the problem:
The document they supposedly signed was intended for the public. So they signed onto a public document that publicly expresses their public affection for Kavanaugh.
You're telling me that they don't want to publicly defend their public expression of their love for Kavanaugh to the public.
So that makes me think they're not even real. Grassley just made most of them up. He got them from the same "binders of women" Romney had.
So only victims of Priests are little kids?
Huh?
Teenagers aren't victims of pedophile Conservative priests? Huh?