Democrats understand science, Republicans defy it

If you stop there you are correct. A hypothesis becomes a theory only when the hypothesis can be predicted repeatedly by testing and other hypotheses ruled out by testing.
AGW is nothing more than a hypotheses. You will never, ever see the word "consensus" used in The Scientific Method.
Scientific illiterates actually believe "consensus" is a Physical Law. Too funny.

Actually, a hypothesis is more like a 'use case' for an existing theory. A hypothesis is always attached to an existing theory. It doesn't explain anything. It usually takes the form of a question such as, "How can I prove this theory wrong?".

There is no magickal point where a 'hypothesis' (what you actually mean is a nonscientific theory) graduates to become a theory of science. There is no elite voting bloc in science to declare a theory is now 'science'. Consensus is not used in science. No theory needs any sort of 'proof', blessing, sanctification, or a greater pile of supporting evidence to become a theory of science. Science does not use supporting evidence. It is only interested in conflicting evidence. Literally mountains of supporting evidence means nothing in the face of a single piece of conflicting evidence.

'Global Warming' is a meaningless buzzword. It can only be defined by itself. No theory of any kind (whether scientific or nonscientific) can exist based on a void argument.
 
In rural America, there’s a sigh of relief: Barack Obama is no longer president. For eight years, the Obama administration waged war against the coal industry.

On the campaign trail in 2016, Trump spoke about dismantling the EPA, saying, "We are going to get rid of it in almost every form. We’re going to have little tidbits left but we’re going to take a tremendous amount out."

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattv...g-the-wings-of-an-out-of-control-epa-n2517659
 
The only thing that can change the temperature of the Earth is a shift in Earth's orbit, changing it's distance from the Sun, or a change in the output of the Sun itself.

It is a stupid question but one that needs to be asked of anyone who thinks the sun has no input into causing the earth to warm. S

But on Earth it has nothing to do with our distance from the sun.

We revolve around the sun in an elliptical orbit rather than a perfect circle.

It is during January that we are the closest to the sun and during July that we are the farthest away.

The temperature on Earth is determined by the tilt of the axis.

When the axis tilts the northern hemisphere towards the sun and southern hemisphere away from the sun, it is summer in the northern hemisphere and winter in the southern hemisphere.

When the axis points the northern hemisphere away from the sun and the southern hemisphere towards it, it is winter in the northern hemisphere and summer in the southern hemisphere.

That's why in Australia it's freezing cold in July and blazing hot on Christmas.
 
Coal is dying, stupid fuck. Get used to it.
Coal is actually doing reasonably well in the market. It's a long way from dying!
You want Mexico-like water? You want Beijing-like air? You want melamine in your pet food?
Mexico's water problems are not caused by pollution, but by poor maintenance of their water distribution and sewage processing systems. Coal actually can burn quite clean. We do so here in the United States. Soot is the result of inefficient burns. We don't do that in the United States.
Pull your head out if your ass, dumbfuck.
Baaaa. Four legs good...two legs baaaad....
Industry will put PCBs in your lakes and streams, nitrates into your groundwater, and poison your air, drinking water
Actually they generally don't. Poisoning your customers is bad for business.
and even your pet food for the sake of profit.
My dog and cat are healthy and happy. They eat that pet food.
The only thing standing between you and those cocksuckers is the government setting standards and monitoring them.
WRONG. Every city, every town, every State, began with people going into the wilderness and hacking out a living. They had no government at all. Government came later to do something about things like thieves, murderers, and other riffraff. The lack of a government did not kill their horses, their dogs, the cattle, or even themselves. They built a marvelous society out of NOTHING.

Capitalism is the only system that creates wealth. Republics (such as the federated republic that the United States is organized as) are the only form of government compatible with capitalism. Oligarchies and dictatorships, such as what you are suggesting, can only exist by stealing wealth.

It has long been known that the Church of Ecology and the Church of Global Warming stem from the Church of Karl Marx. Yes...I know what you are.
 
But on Earth it has nothing to do with our distance from the sun.
Yes it does.
We revolve around the sun in an elliptical orbit rather than a perfect circle.
True. We are actually moving more toward a circular orbit at this point.
It is during January that we are the closest to the sun and during July that we are the farthest away.
True.
The temperature on Earth is determined by the tilt of the axis.
The tilt of the Earth's axis does not change the temperature of the Earth.
When the axis tilts the northern hemisphere towards the sun and southern hemisphere away from the sun, it is summer in the northern hemisphere and winter in the southern hemisphere.
When the axis points the northern hemisphere away from the sun and the southern hemisphere towards it, it is winter in the northern hemisphere and summer in the southern hemisphere.
That's why in Australia it's freezing cold in July and blazing hot on Christmas.
The temperature of the Earth does not change. You are simply describing seasons. You are describing hemispheric temperatures, not the temperature of the Earth.
 
My kids want to go for the laughs.

FYI: many non mainstream Christians understand there was a universe before Genesis and life on Earth. I am not gonna slam the 5000 year belief system believers (little ones). It is part of the apostasy and they are believing what they are taught. Jesus is eternal. Eternity past, current and eternity future. Don't be dragged down.
 
Last edited:
Those that believe in the 'global warming' can't even define the phrase other than by itself. It's just a buzzword...meaninigless.

You have assumed that all registered voters are believers in the religion of 'global warming'. This is actually bigotry. It is a compositional error fallacy involving people as the class. Registered voters are made up of people that belong to this religion, and also those that don't.
Believers in the Church of Global Warming deny science and mathematics.

You're cute! Can I bat you around as a play toy? Thanks!

I'm a liberal. So was my dad, who was also a scientist. (As are two of my five kids). I'm also a retired health care professional who took university-level science and math classes to get her degree. My husband has a masters and spent his career in IT as a software engineer/systems architect. So yeah, I know math n science. I understand how science works, how to make observations over time, how to collect data, how to formulate a hypothesis, how to then use that data to formulate a theory. Oh, and yeah -- I know what a theory is as well. I'm just one of millions of other Americans, and even more millions of global citizens, who understand science and mathematics... and what "peer review" means. Unfortunately for you most educated ppl tend to skew to the left -- because we are educated and not prone to superstitious beliefs like Fox Knows Best. I'm afraid you're just a rabid raccoon barking up a dead tree, in a dying forest, where no one can hear you.
 
FYI: many non mainstream Christians understand there was a universe before Genesis and life on Earth. I am not gonna slam the 5000 year belief system believers (little ones). It is part of the apostasy and they are believing what they are taught. Jesus is eternal. Eternity past, current and eternity future. Don't be dragged down.

Most mainstream Christians that I know believe the Earth is a bit older than 6K years...
 
Most mainstream Christians that I know believe the Earth is a bit older than 6K years...

good. please be careful not to offend The Lord's "little ones which believe on Him". I am afraid to laugh at simple believers which may not understand the pre genesis creation and believe upon Him. they are innocent. that is; that museum may be run by innocent, simple, guarded , special little ones.
 
good. please be careful not to offend The Lord's "little ones which believe on Him". I am afraid to laugh at simple believers which may not understand the pre genesis creation and believe upon Him. they are innocent. that is; that museum may be run by innocent, simple, guarded , special little ones.

Simple is as simple does. It would still make me laugh, much like a Flat Earth Museum would make me laugh. Though I am a Buddhist, even a Buddhist can find things funny.
 
good. please be careful not to offend The Lord's "little ones which believe on Him". I am afraid to laugh at simple believers which may not understand the pre genesis creation and believe upon Him. they are innocent. that is; that museum may be run by innocent, simple, guarded , special little ones.

Simple is as simple does. It would still make me laugh, much like a Flat Earth Museum would make me laugh. Though I am a Buddhist, even a Buddhist can find things funny.
 
Back
Top