Fentoine Lum
Verified User
He's doing much more meaningful work now.
NFL's Request for Colin Kaepernick Collusion Case Dismissal Denied by Arbitrator
- Thread starter blackascoal
- Start date
He's doing much more meaningful work now.
Fentoine Lum
Verified User
That's not why you're here wound tight, must've landed a blow somewhere else.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Sure .. so says a football fan .. which I'm pretty sure is not admissible in court.
What the experts say will be.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
... with 20 million in the bank and more on the way.
Fentoine Lum
Verified User
He put his dick squarely in the eye of the power structure, out in front of god and everybody. So few citizens, so many spectators.
What are you slobbering about?
Darth Omar
Russian asset
But ‘the experts’ are the NFL lol.
They live or die by their ability to grade talent.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
That's the point.
Getin the ring
Verified User
NFL OWNERS: "Kapernick is not good enough to play in the NFL"
JUDGE: "Anything else you would like to add Mr Kapernick before I dismiss this case"
JUDGE: "Anything else you would like to add Mr Kapernick before I dismiss this case"
Darth Omar
Russian asset
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Obviously you know nothing about football. :0)
Fans like you are a dime per 100,000.
Isn't it the fans who pay to watch?
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Thats the point, they colluded to keep him off a team.
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
Pretty sure the court is not a football expert. Anyway, I didn't just watch Kaeperpick suck in 2014 and 2015. I watched ESPN watch Kaeperpick suck, as well.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Pretty sure that expert analysis WILL be admitted in court .. what, you don't?
I get it, you're not a Kap fan.
... got it .. but that has nothing to do with this care.
Eagle_Eye
Well-known member
Are you saying the fans are so stupid they can't tell the difference between SO SO quarterback and a talented quarterback?
Darth Omar
Russian asset
And how easy do you think it will be to prove collusion in that instance lol?
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Kaepernick collusion case proving that teams viewed him as a starting quarterback
Remember when quarterback Colin Kaepernick initially went unsigned after becoming a free agent in March 2017? Remember the false and overstated concerns that were being pushed to justify the position that he was unemployed for football reasons? Remember when some said that was all a bunch of crap?
As it turns out, it was.
If the subtle-on-the-surface shift that happened last July, when Kaepernick’s status went from being about only football to being about non-football considerations, wasn’t enough to prove that the “all about football” narrative amounted to nonsense, the ongoing collusion case is establishing that multiple teams viewed Kaepernick as a starting NFL quarterback in 2017, and that they continue to view him that way. Per a source with knowledge of the situation, internal franchise documents generated as part of the free-agency evaluation process and testimony from witnesses harvested via depositions in the collusion litigation has established that teams viewed Kaepernick as being good enough not simply to be employed by an NFL team, but to be a starting quarterback for an NFL team.
So why wasn’t he?
The real reason has been obvious for more than a year, and if anyone still believes that Kaepernick’s unemployment arose from the belief that he couldn’t perform at a sufficiently high level, that’s just simply not the case. (Although at this point there’s no chance anyone’s long-made-up mind will be changing on anything related to Kaepernick, facts notwithstanding.) The deeper question becomes whether Kaepernick and his lawyers can prove coordination among the teams and/or through the league office in connection with the decision to steer clear of Kaepernick based on his role at the forefront of protests that occurred during the national anthem.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...t-teams-viewed-him-as-a-starting-quarterback/
Sorry if this steps on the toes of those who thought they knew something about football.
Remember when quarterback Colin Kaepernick initially went unsigned after becoming a free agent in March 2017? Remember the false and overstated concerns that were being pushed to justify the position that he was unemployed for football reasons? Remember when some said that was all a bunch of crap?
As it turns out, it was.
If the subtle-on-the-surface shift that happened last July, when Kaepernick’s status went from being about only football to being about non-football considerations, wasn’t enough to prove that the “all about football” narrative amounted to nonsense, the ongoing collusion case is establishing that multiple teams viewed Kaepernick as a starting NFL quarterback in 2017, and that they continue to view him that way. Per a source with knowledge of the situation, internal franchise documents generated as part of the free-agency evaluation process and testimony from witnesses harvested via depositions in the collusion litigation has established that teams viewed Kaepernick as being good enough not simply to be employed by an NFL team, but to be a starting quarterback for an NFL team.
So why wasn’t he?
The real reason has been obvious for more than a year, and if anyone still believes that Kaepernick’s unemployment arose from the belief that he couldn’t perform at a sufficiently high level, that’s just simply not the case. (Although at this point there’s no chance anyone’s long-made-up mind will be changing on anything related to Kaepernick, facts notwithstanding.) The deeper question becomes whether Kaepernick and his lawyers can prove coordination among the teams and/or through the league office in connection with the decision to steer clear of Kaepernick based on his role at the forefront of protests that occurred during the national anthem.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.c...t-teams-viewed-him-as-a-starting-quarterback/
Sorry if this steps on the toes of those who thought they knew something about football.