Papadopoulos Urged to Withdraw Guilty Plea – Was Set Up By Deep State Spies

Darth Omar said:
Still, it would be nice to see some actual evidence lol.

Is this going to turn out like WMD’s in Iraq?
Click to expand...

Actual evidence of what? No official allegation has been made. With WMD in Iraq, allegations were made, and a war was started killing many people before the lack of evidence was apparent. Now your point would be well taken if Rump were impeached, then evidence was found to be lacking after.

That wont happen here. Noting will happen to Trump until after the evidence is presented.

Mueller might present a report saying Rump did nothing wrong... then there would be no evidence presented.

Mueller might present a report saying Rump did do something wrong... then he would have to present evidence.

That is how an investigation works. You dont have to show any evidence unless you accuse someone of something.
 
Jarod said:
Actual evidence of what? No official allegation has been made. With WMD in Iraq, allegations were made, and a war was started killing many people before the lack of evidence was apparent. Now your point would be well taken if Rump were impeached, then evidence was found to be lacking after.

That wont happen here. Noting will happen to Trump until after the evidence is presented.

Mueller might present a report saying Rump did nothing wrong... then there would be no evidence presented.

Mueller might present a report saying Rump did do something wrong... then he would have to present evidence.

That is how an investigation works. You dont have to show any evidence unless you accuse someone of something.
Click to expand...

They started an investigation without an alleged crime?

Doesn’t Putin do that sort of thing?
 
Darth Omar said:
They started an investigation without an alleged crime?

Doesn’t Putin do that sort of thing?
Click to expand...

The Untied States does that all the time.

Its the way it works. An investigator sees something suspicious, or an intelligence officer sees something suspicious and starts investigating. They often don't know if a crime has been committed or not yet, but they investigate to find out. That's how this works.

Police officer sees a car driving erratically, he wonders if that driver is sick, or drunk, or maybe just tired or on the phone. The police officer pulls the car over and investigates. The officer smells alcohol on the guys breath or does not smell alcohol... the guy has a reasonable explanation or does not.... the guy has slurred speech or not.

Maybe the driver seems perfectly sober and says, "Sorry officer, I was eating a cheese burger and the grease spilled on me, so I jumped." The officer sees ketchup on the guys shirt and a chease burger with a single bite sitting in the driver's lap. The guy broke no law and the officer says, have a nice day.

At the end of the investigation the officer makes a determination if the investigation led him to a reasonable belief the driver was drunk or not. If so, the driver is arrested. If not the Officer says please drive more carefully and have a nice day.
 
At three A.M. police see a vehicle on a dark road known for drug activity. The police pull up behind the car and watch for a while, they see what they think is a struggle in the car. They are investigating. Maybe a crime is happening or not, maybe a domestic violence attack or a drug deal. They approach the car and see a teenager with her shirt off and she is kissing a boy. The investigation found that no crime was happening, just horney teenagers. No crime.
 
Jarod said:
The Untied States does that all the time.

Its the way it works. An investigator sees something suspicious, or an intelligence officer sees something suspicious and starts investigating. They often don't know if a crime has been committed or not yet, but they investigate to find out. That's how this works.

Police officer sees a car driving erratically, he wonders if that driver is sick, or drunk, or maybe just tired or on the phone. The police officer pulls the car over and investigates. The officer smells alcohol on the guys breath or does not smell alcohol... the guy has a reasonable explanation or does not.... the guy has slurred speech or not.

Maybe the driver seems perfectly sober and says, "Sorry officer, I was eating a cheese burger and the grease spilled on me, so I jumped." The officer sees ketchup on the guys shirt and a chease burger with a single bite sitting in the driver's lap. The guy broke no law and the officer says, have a nice day.

At the end of the investigation the officer makes a determination if the investigation led him to a reasonable belief the driver was drunk or not. If so, the driver is arrested. If not the Officer says please drive more carefully and have a nice day.
Click to expand...

We needed an SP for that?

No, they needed an SP to ‘stop Trump’.

And we are over due for THAT SP investigation.
 
Or, Australian Embassy calls FBI... "Hey we are concerned, our guy in England herard Papadopulos (Trump campaign aid) is spending time with a known Russian spy. Thought we would tell you."

FBI starts looking into it. Maybe nothing, maybe Papadopoulos is having an affair, or its his AA sponsor or a friend he likes to have a beer with... or maybe there is a mole in the Trump campaign, or maybe the Trump campaign is doing something illegal with the Russians, we don't know but it is unusual and we should look into it.
 
Darth Omar said:
We needed an SP for that?

No, they needed an SP to ‘stop Trump’.

And we are over due for THAT SP investigation.
Click to expand...

No, two different things.... We had the investigation because of suspicious activity. The Republicans appointed a SP because during the FBI's investigation Trump fired the director of the FBI who alleged that Trump had asked him to go easy on one of the targets and Trump went on National Television and said he fired the guy because of the investigation.
 
Jarod said:
No, two different things.... We had the investigation because of suspicious activity. The Republicans appointed a SP because during the FBI's investigation Trump fired the director of the FBI who alleged that Trump had asked him to go easy on one of the targets and Trump went on National Television and said he fired the guy because of the investigation.
Click to expand...

The appointed SP was turned down for the job that Comey was fired from.

And is BFF with Comey. I think the term for that is ‘stacking the deck’.

It’s about ‘stopping Trump’ and it’s no big secret.
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
Or, Australian Embassy calls FBI... "Hey we are concerned, our guy in England herard Papadopulos (Trump campaign aid) is spending time with a known Russian spy. Thought we would tell you."

FBI starts looking into it. Maybe nothing, maybe Papadopoulos is having an affair, or its his AA sponsor or a friend he likes to have a beer with... or maybe there is a mole in the Trump campaign, or maybe the Trump campaign is doing something illegal with the Russians, we don't know but it is unusual and we should look into it.
Click to expand...

And they did everything but alert the Trump campaign.

Why?
 
Darth Omar said:
The appointed SP was turned down for the job that Comey was fired from.

And is BFF with Comey. I think the term for that is ‘stacking the deck’.

It’s about ‘stopping Trump’ and it’s no big secret.
Click to expand...

Both trump lies that you fell for.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top