Collusion In One Tweet

I'm still looking for collusion in the tweet.......by the way weren't the board lib'ruls, just last week, saying that only conservatives ever use the word collusion?......
 
Donald J. Trump
‏
Verified account

@realDonaldTrump
Follow Follow @realDonaldTrump
More
Fake News reporting, a complete fabrication, that I am concerned about the meeting my wonderful son, Donald, had in Trump Tower. This was a meeting to get information on an opponent, totally legal and done all the time in politics - and it went nowhere. I did not know about it!

That was a meeting with known representatives of the Russian government (as shown by the Don Jr e-mails) and it is NOT legal
 
Lesh said:
Does it matter when Trump admits his crimes?

The fact remains that he did
Click to expand...

Opposition research is not a crime. You people have lost your minds.

Let me see, opposition research is a crime, but hiring foreign operatives to use Kremlin connections to manufacture fake dirt to use against a political opponent, and then passing this fake information on to operarives in the us intelligence community, ILLEGALLY THROUGH UNOFFICIAL CHANNELS, who then use this fake Russian information to start a bogus counter intelligence investigation against said political opponent, is a-okay. Is that about right?

And what about Adam "Shifty" Schiff, on tape, with Russian pranksters, who he believes have direct ties to Putin, trying to get dirt on Trump. Is that collusion too? SHUT.THE.FUCK.UP.
 
.by the way weren't the board lib'ruls, just last week, saying that only conservatives ever use the word collusion?

That kinda changes when Trump outright admits it
 
countryboy said:
Opposition research is not a crime. You people have lost your minds.

Let me see, opposition research is a crime, but hiring foreign operatives to use Kremlin connections to manufacture fake dirt to use against a political opponent, and then passing this fake information on to operarives in the us intelligence community, ILLEGALLY THROUGH UNOFFICIAL CHANNELS, who then use this fake Russian information to start a bogus counter intelligence investigation against said political opponent, is a-okay. Is that about right?

And what about Adam "Shifty" Schiff, on tape, with Russian pranksters, who he believes have direct ties to Putin, trying to get dirt on Trump. Is that collusion too? SHUT.THE.FUCK.UP.
Click to expand...

Again. Opposition research obtained from a foreign government IS a crime. In fact several.

If Clinton is guilty of it fine. Prosecute.

Trump has ADMITTED it
 
Lesh said:
Again. Opposition research obtained from a foreign government IS a crime. In fact several.

If Clinton is guilty of it fine. Prosecute.

Trump has ADMITTED it
Click to expand...

Show me the statute, and what information was acquired in the tower meeting. Also, where are your posts condemning the use of "illegal foreign information" to start a bogus counter intelligence investigation into Trump, which continues to this day?

While you're at it, demonstrate how the Clinton connected Russians at the tower meeting are a "foreign government". You are a fraud.

Also, while you're at it, show us where Ted Kennedy was ever prosecuted for actually travelling to the Soviet Union to meet with the KGB to make plans to hurt Reagan's campaign?

Again, SHUT.THE.FUCK.UP.
 
countryboy said:
Show me the statute, and what information was acquired in the tower meeting. Also, where are your posts condemning the use of "illegal foreign information" to start a bogus counter intelligence investigation into Trump, which continues to this day?

While you're at it, demonstrate how the Clinton connected Russians at the tower meeting are a "foreign government". You are a fraud.

Also, while you're at it, show us where Ted Kennedy was ever prosecuted for actually travelling to the Soviet Union to meet with the KGB to make plans to hurt Reagan's campaign?

Again, SHUT.THE.FUCK.UP.
Click to expand...

The statutes have been listed on this very forum numerous times.

They include violations of election laws, conspiracy to defraud the US government, espionage.

Whether or not information was actually accepted at that meeting (and we have only the word of the lying Trump criminals that it wasn't) the ATTEMPT is illegal.

As noted previously...if Ted Kennedy or anyone else broke the law...they should be prosecuted. That has no bearing on what the Trump camapign and Admin has done.

As far as your epithets


EAT SHIT MUTHERFUCKER\

There. Now we're even
 
Lesh said:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/opinion-trump-tweet-russia-meeting_us_5b6f05b3e4b0ae32af988cd3

There it is folks.

Collusion in plain site
Click to expand...


Does this meet YOUR definition of admitting collusion? The Hillary Campaign admitted to paying Coie.


Teflon Don said:
She conspired with Russia to try to WIN her election. What I present is DOCUMENTED fact

1) Hillary Clinton enlisted the services of Perkins Coie
2) Perkins Coie enlisted the services of Fusion GPS
3) Fusion GPS enlisted the services of Christopher Steele

According to the Steele Dossier which according to leftists is the bible of Trump Collusion. These were his sources for said dossier

1) A senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure
2) A former top Russian intelligence officer
3) Several knowledgeable FSB sources
4) A trusted compatriot (there are references to at least 5 of these)
5) A former top level Russian intelligence officer who is still active inside the Kremlin
6) A senior Russian financial official
7) A close associate of Trump
8) Source E (redacted)
9) A female staffer at the Ritz Carlton hotel
10) An ethnic Russian operative connected to the Ritz Carlton hotel
11) A senior Kremlin official
12) A Russian IT specialist with direct knowledge of FSB operations
13) A senior Russian government figure
14) An ethnic Russian who is a close associate of Trump
15) A separate source with direct knowledge of Trump’s investment in Russia
16) A Russian source close to Rosneft President
17) An official close to Presidential Administration Head Sergei Ivanov
18) A Kremlin official close to Sergei IVANOV
19) A trusted associate of a Russian émigré
20) Two well-placed and established Kremlin sources
21) A source close to premier Dmitriy Medvedev
22) A close colleague (of Steele)
23) A Kremlin official involved in US relations
24) A Kremlin insider
25) A Kremlin advisor
26) A well-placed Russian figure
27) An American political figure associated with TRUMP
28) A senior member of the Russian Presidential Administration (PA)
29) A senior Russian MFA official
30) Top level Russian official
31) Two knowledgeable St Petersburg sources
32) A senior Russian leadership figure
33) A Russian Foreign Ministry official
34) Igor Sechin’s close associate


Oh and if you doubt my facts. Here from the Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.7e6cf39f7a29

Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.

After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community, according to those people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the company in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that agreement, Fusion GPS's research into Trump was funded by an unknown Republican client during the GOP primary.

The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS's research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day.


Now this is where you try to hide behind the "The GOP started it" as if that absolves Hillary Clinton of paying for this through October 2016. Which ironically enough is when Carter Page's FISA warrant was approved. Coincidence?

Now, isn't it odd that the Hillary Clinton campaign would pay $15 million and not want to know what they were getting? You think they didn't know? Really?

What we have here is DOCUMENTED proof of the Hillary Clinton campaign colluding with Russians to impact an American election. That she did it through other sources doesn't matter.

It is like saying, because you hired a lawyer who then hired the search firm who then hired the hit man you aren't guilty of murder.

I will now humbly accept your concession
Click to expand...
 
Steve Bannon: It was unpatriotic and treasonous

“The three senior guys in the campaign thought it was a good idea to meet with a foreign government inside Trump Tower in the conference room on the 25th floor – with no lawyers. They didn’t have any lawyers. Even if you thought that this was not treasonous, or unpatriotic, or bad shit, and I happen to think it’s all of that, you should have called the FBI immediately "
- Steve Bannon, Chief Strategist to Donald Trump
9B1ux5a.jpg


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/03/donald-trump-russia-steve-bannon-michael-wolff
 
countryboy said:
Show me the statute, and what information was acquired in the tower meeting. Also, where are your posts condemning the use of "illegal foreign information" to start a bogus counter intelligence investigation into Trump, which continues to this day?

While you're at it, demonstrate how the Clinton connected Russians at the tower meeting are a "foreign government". You are a fraud.

Also, while you're at it, show us where Ted Kennedy was ever prosecuted for actually travelling to the Soviet Union to meet with the KGB to make plans to hurt Reagan's campaign?

Again, SHUT.THE.FUCK.UP.
Click to expand...

You’ve been shown the statutes multiple times, you fucking moron. How many more do you need?
 
Lesh said:
The statutes have been listed on this very forum numerous times.

They include violations of election laws, conspiracy to defraud the US government, espionage.

Whether or not information was actually accepted at that meeting (and we have only the word of the lying Trump criminals that it wasn't) the ATTEMPT is illegal.

As noted previously...if Ted Kennedy or anyone else broke the law...they should be prosecuted. That has no bearing on what the Trump camapign and Admin has done.

As far as your epithets


EAT SHIT MUTHERFUCKER\

There. Now we're even
Click to expand...

You're partisan hackery is duly noted.
 
domer76 said:
You’ve been shown the statutes multiple times, you fucking moron. How many more do you need?
Click to expand...

Here is real Russian collusion bitch. All documented and verifiable. LOCK THE BITCH UP


1) Hillary Clinton enlisted the services of Perkins Coie
2) Perkins Coie enlisted the services of Fusion GPS
3) Fusion GPS enlisted the services of Christopher Steele

According to the Steele Dossier which according to leftists is the bible of Trump Collusion. These were his sources for said dossier

1) A senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure
2) A former top Russian intelligence officer
3) Several knowledgeable FSB sources
4) A trusted compatriot (there are references to at least 5 of these)
5) A former top level Russian intelligence officer who is still active inside the Kremlin
6) A senior Russian financial official
7) A close associate of Trump
8) Source E (redacted)
9) A female staffer at the Ritz Carlton hotel
10) An ethnic Russian operative connected to the Ritz Carlton hotel
11) A senior Kremlin official
12) A Russian IT specialist with direct knowledge of FSB operations
13) A senior Russian government figure
14) An ethnic Russian who is a close associate of Trump
15) A separate source with direct knowledge of Trump’s investment in Russia
16) A Russian source close to Rosneft President
17) An official close to Presidential Administration Head Sergei Ivanov
18) A Kremlin official close to Sergei IVANOV
19) A trusted associate of a Russian émigré
20) Two well-placed and established Kremlin sources
21) A source close to premier Dmitriy Medvedev
22) A close colleague (of Steele)
23) A Kremlin official involved in US relations
24) A Kremlin insider
25) A Kremlin advisor
26) A well-placed Russian figure
27) An American political figure associated with TRUMP
28) A senior member of the Russian Presidential Administration (PA)
29) A senior Russian MFA official
30) Top level Russian official
31) Two knowledgeable St Petersburg sources
32) A senior Russian leadership figure
33) A Russian Foreign Ministry official
34) Igor Sechin’s close associate






Oh and if you doubt my facts. Here from the Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.7e6cf39f7a29

Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.

After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community, according to those people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the company in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that agreement, Fusion GPS's research into Trump was funded by an unknown Republican client during the GOP primary.

The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS's research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day.


Now this is where you try to hide behind the "The GOP started it" as if that absolves Hillary Clinton of paying for this through October 2016. Which ironically enough is when Carter Page's FISA warrant was approved. Coincidence?

Now, isn't it odd that the Hillary Clinton campaign would pay $15 million and not want to know what they were getting? You think they didn't know? Really?

What we have here is DOCUMENTED proof of the Hillary Clinton campaign colluding with Russians to impact an American election. That she did it through other sources doesn't matter.

It is like saying, because you hired a lawyer who then hired the search firm who then hired the hit man you aren't guilty of murder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top