Trump promised pay increases of $4,000 - $9,000 if Russia Tax Cut was passed

LINK to Trump promised pay increases of $4,000 - $9,000 if Russia Tax Cut was passed please. Thank you.



Link to this claim please. Thank you.



Once again you would be wrong; as you are on almost everything. Why do you like removing any lingering doubt you're a lying leftist asshole on steroids?

Probably because a lying prick like you can't read what has already been posted just to satisfy the stupid on the right that know nothing, learn nothing. Fucking idiot.
 
Probably because a lying prick like you can't read what has already been posted just to satisfy the stupid on the right that know nothing, learn nothing. Fucking idiot.

No; more likely a whiny brain dead moron can only parrot the idiot narratives you are fed. You define stupid. You define moron. You calling ANYONE an idiot is the epitome of Irony. I would call you a whiny punk but you're more like whiny little pussy.

giphy.gif
 
Once again. Look at the chart. Take a really good look. Then just shoot yourself. If you need help, let me know.

Did you take a look at the chart? It's very telling for how bad Trump has been.

Q2 2016 (Obama): 7.94%
Q3 2016 (Obama): 8.68% (+9%)
Q4 2016 (Obama): 9.45% (+9%)
Q1 2017 (Obama & Trump): 10.42% (+10%)
Q2 2017 (Trump): 10.77% (+3%)
Q3 2017 (Trump): 11.3% (+5%)
Q4 2017 (Trump): 11.92% (+5%)
Q1 2018 (Trump): 12.71% (+6%)
Q2 2018 (Trump): 11.12% (-13%)

So did you really look at the chart, or were you just lying?

Wage gains during the final year of Obama were all higher than any wage gains during Trump for employees in companies with less than 99 people.

SO before, when you said PayScale was "disingenuous" because they didn't report on small businesses, even though they did, you were bullshitting, weren't you?
 
Did you take a look at the chart? It's very telling for how bad Trump has been.

Q2 2016 (Obama): 7.94%
Q3 2016 (Obama): 8.68% (+9%)
Q4 2016 (Obama): 9.45% (+9%)
Q1 2017 (Obama & Trump): 10.42% (+10%)
Q2 2017 (Trump): 10.77% (+3%)
Q3 2017 (Trump): 11.3% (+5%)
Q4 2017 (Trump): 11.92% (+5%)
Q1 2018 (Trump): 12.71% (+6%)
Q2 2018 (Trump): 11.12% (-13%)

So did you really look at the chart, or were you just lying?

Wage gains during the final year of Obama were all higher than any wage gains during Trump for employees in companies with less than 99 people.

SO before, when you said PayScale was "disingenuous" because they didn't report on small businesses, even though they did, you were bullshitting, weren't you?

Do you even know what the fuck you are looking at? Or what it means? Or basic math? This ought to be good.
 
Do you even know what the fuck you are looking at? Or what it means? Or basic math? This ought to be good.

You seem to be posturing.

Fact is the chart shows wage growth under Trump for small business employees was worse than during Obama, even with your shitty Russian Tax Cuts.

That's what the data shows.

Explain it to me a different way if you think it shows something different.
 
You seem to be posturing.

Fact is the chart shows wage growth under Trump for small business employees was worse than during Obama, even with your shitty Russian Tax Cuts.

That's what the data shows.

Explain it to me a different way if you think it shows something different.

Do yourself a favor and hit view all on that chart. Then come back and try to make that statement.
 
Do yourself a favor and hit view all on that chart. Then come back and try to make that statement.

Even then, Obama still had better growth in wages over his 8 years.

So what are you trying to prove? That Obama went from 2.88% in Q2 2009 to 10.42% in Q1 2017? Yeah, that's growth of 350% over 8 years.

We were told that your Russia Tax Cuts would mean $4,000-$9,000 in increased wages. That didn't happen.

And you argued that there was good wage growth, but it was in small businesses and PayScale didn't include them except that PayScale does include small businesses and it shows that those small business workers have seen their wages decline and/or remained largely flat.

Let's not forget you didn't even believe PayScale had small business data.

So why did you lie and say they didn't at first?
 
Even then, Obama still had better growth in wages over his 8 years.

So what are you trying to prove? That Obama went from 2.88% in Q2 2009 to 10.42% in Q1 2017? Yeah, that's growth of 350% over 8 years.

We were told that your Russia Tax Cuts would mean $4,000-$9,000 in increased wages. That didn't happen.

And you argued that there was good wage growth, but it was in small businesses and PayScale didn't include them except that PayScale does include small businesses and it shows that those small business workers have seen their wages decline and/or remained largely flat.

Let's not forget you didn't even believe PayScale had small business data.

So why did you lie and say they didn't at first?

Lad. You are not only wrong, you are getting boring. Before I go though, what does payscale say one how it collects its data?
 
Lad. You are not only wrong, you are getting boring. Before I go though, what does payscale say one how it collects its data?

You said PayScale is "disingenuous" because it didn't cover small business.

Except that it does, and in doing so, shows small business employee wage growth trails medium and large businesses.

Then you whined about a chart that shows just that.

Then when the info on the chart is broken down further, continuing to show how poor Trump is, you frantically scramble to gaslight the source. The source you previously said didn't cover what it did cover.

So why did you lie and say PayScale didn't include small businesses when it clearly does? It's because you were talking out of your ass, trying to gaslight a source that continues to make you feel like shit for supporting terrible economic and fiscal policy.
 
You said PayScale is "disingenuous" because it didn't cover small business.

Except that it does, and in doing so, shows small business employee wage growth trails medium and large businesses.

Then you whined about a chart that shows just that.

Then when the info on the chart is broken down further, continuing to show how poor Trump is, you frantically scramble to gaslight the source. The source you previously said didn't cover what it did cover.

So why did you lie and say PayScale didn't include small businesses when it clearly does? It's because you were talking out of your ass, trying to gaslight a source that continues to make you feel like shit for supporting terrible economic and fiscal policy.

You are avoiding the question. And have a real comprehension problem. I said the first article you linked to is disingenuous. It is. You second article is no better, nor any more accurate. So, once again, how do they collect data? I am curious to know. You should be also.
 
Before I go though, what does payscale say one how it collects its data?

Look at how weak this gaslighting is.

I linked to their methodologies. If you have a problem with their methodology, articulate it. Don't just vaguely and passively ask questions you can answer yourself. You ask questions you don't even know the answers to, but you can find very easily. So why are you asking me these questions and not answering them yourself? The answer is that you're incapable and you need a nanny to do things for you because you can't seem to do them yourself. So much for "personal responsibility".

I guess Conservatives just aren't the well-read, well-researched people they pretend to be. What a shock.
 
Look at how weak this gaslighting is.

I linked to their methodologies. If you have a problem with their methodology, articulate it. Don't just vaguely and passively ask questions you can answer yourself. You ask questions you don't even know the answers to, but you can find very easily. So why are you asking me these questions and not answering them yourself? The answer is that you're incapable and you need a nanny to do things for you because you can't seem to do them yourself. So much for "personal responsibility".

I guess Conservatives just aren't the well-read, well-researched people they pretend to be. What a shock.

I must have missed that. Could you post it again?
 
You are avoiding the question. And have a real comprehension problem. I said the first article you linked to is disingenuous. It is. You second article is no better, nor any more accurate. So, once again, how do they collect data? I am curious to know. You should be also.

The first article I linked to WAS PAYSCALE.

You said before that PayScale was disingenuous because it didn't cover small businesses and you insisted that small business workers were seeing wage growth.

Only PayScale does cover small businesses, and the data shows wage growth for those workers trailed those at medium and large businesses.

So you spoke out of your ass once already.

I also linked to the methodologies. Why did you ignore that link?

The answer is because you're a hack and a piece of shit garbage person.
 
I must have missed that. Could you post it again?

Look at how incapable and lazy you are.

You can just click through the tabs at the top and find the post. You even responded to it, which means you didn't read it, you ignored it. And why? Because you're a piece of shit.

Anywho, here's the post:

PayScale data isn't relegated to just big corporations.

Here's the methodology explaining just that: https://www.payscale.com/payscale-index/compensation-trends-methodology:



You're trying to gaslight something that makes your position look like shit. And what makes it even more hilarious is that PayScale does track earnings for workers in companies with less than 99 workers. And guess what? Wage declines for those workers are even worse than workers as a whole.

According to PayScale, businesses with 99 or fewer employees saw wages decline by 1.4% from last quarter and have grown a meager 0.3% year-over-year. That ranks below Medium and Large companies, according to PayScale's index.

Delete your account; kill yourself because you're a disingenuous scumbag who lies. You utterly lied. You lied about PayScale. You're a liar. A complete and total fucking fraud and liar.
 
Look at how incapable and lazy you are.

You can just click through the tabs at the top and find the post. You even responded to it, which means you didn't read it, you ignored it. And why? Because you're a piece of shit.

Anywho, here's the post:

Could not wait for you. You always take to long. Found it. It is their software. With a smattering of asking people things. Occasionally looking at other sources. All in their methodology page. Basically whatever they decide to make it into. Thanks for playing idiot.
 
I must have missed that. Could you post it again?

How could you have "missed it", when you responded to it and even quoted it in Post #40 on this thread?

Jesus fucking, tap-dancing Christ, Conservatives are such liars and frauds.
 
Could not wait for you. You always take to long. Found it. It is their software. With a smattering of asking people things. Occasionally looking at other sources. All in their methodology page. Basically whatever they decide to make it into. Thanks for playing idiot.

Software based on...extensive data of over 35 million employee profiles.

They go further: For The PayScale Index, we evaluate the difference between these two pay figures for over 300,000 employee profiles in each quarter. The aggregate difference reflects changes in pay over time, and forms the basis of The PayScale Index.

So once again, you are trying to gaslight something that doesn't conform to your bias.

Kill yourself.
 
How could you have "missed it", when you responded to it and even quoted it in Post #40 on this thread?

Jesus fucking, tap-dancing Christ, Conservatives are such liars and frauds.

Do you honestly, even for a second, think anyone actually reads through your entire drivel? Once the whining starts (usually right off the bat) one tends to just glance through and move on. Do not flatter yourself.
 
Back
Top