Sen Lindsey Graham commits to introducing legislation to severely punish Russia for

Senator Lindsey Graham commits to introducing legislation that will severely punish Russia for hack interference w/ US elections

Recent reports indicate bogus IDs were established in social media, IDs traced to Russia.
Investigators seem to believe there's a connection between these ghost ID's, & Russia.

Our senior Republican leadership don't like it.

a) Do you support Sen. Graham on this?

b) Since in the 2016 election, indications are not merely that the Russians interfered with U.S. election, but that this Russian interference benefited the Republican party. If so, might the legislation Graham has committed to here actually work to the detriment of the G.O.P.?

c) Whatever Graham comes up with, do you think it'll be adequate? Or will Putin simply accept it, as he did the sanctions that resulted from the Crimea annexation?

And the sound of WAR MONGERING DRUMS beat in the distance in an attempt to keep the deep state in business. What idiots. :palm:
 
I agree.

He has a substantial base of support - much like Trump in our country - but Russia does not have a free press, viable opposition parties, or free and fair elections. So I do not really consider Putin a democratically-elected leader.

You make Russia sound like Trump's dreams of making America great as he defines great.
 
I agree.

He has a substantial base of support - much like Trump in our country - but Russia does not have a free press, viable opposition parties, or free and fair elections. So I do not really consider Putin a democratically-elected leader.

Pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft, america has a corporate state press not a free press, "two" parties that vie to represent the Wall Street/donor/"job creator" class alone to the detriment of society at large, openly corrupt primaries, a political system where the outcome is determined by funding alone in most cases, a system in which the candidate with less votes wins frequently, a system in which a permanent cabal of Goldman Sachs execs is always in the white house regardless of electoral outcomes, and a system that says corporations are people and their $ = speech.

Hardly free and fair elections with democratically-elected "leaders".
 
The ‘fact checker’ omitting Trump’s selling arms to Ukraine is inexcusable.
i've found many fact check are not really fact checking -it's a form of fake news not to notate
Javelin and NATO forward positioning

what purpose does yet more sanctions serve except to cripple Russia to limp towards Xi?
 
i've found many fact check are not really fact checking -it's a form of fake news not to notate
Javelin and NATO forward positioning

what purpose does yet more sanctions serve except to cripple Russia to limp towards Xi?

US partnering with neonazis in Ukraine, MAGA.
 
I agree.

He has a substantial base of support - much like Trump in our country - but Russia does not have a free press, viable opposition parties, or free and fair elections. So I do not really consider Putin a democratically-elected leader.
then again it's none of our business how Russian elections are run.
 
US partnering with neonazis in Ukraine, MAGA.
The U.S. has Installed a Neo-Nazi Government in Ukraine
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-u-s-has-installed-a-neo-nazi-government-in-ukraine/5371554
According to the New York Times, “The United States and the European Union have embraced the revolution here as another flowering of democracy, a blow to authoritarianism and kleptocracy in the former Soviet space.” ( After Initial Triumph, Ukraine’s Leaders Face Battle for Credibility, NYTimes.com, March 1, 2014, emphasis added)

“Flowering Democracy, Revolution”? The grim realities are otherwise.
What is a stake is a US-EU-NATO sponsored coup d’Etat in blatant violation of international law.

The forbidden truth is that the West has engineered –through a carefully staged covert operation– the formation of a proxy regime integrated by Neo-Nazis.

Confirmed by Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, key organizations in the Ukraine including the Neo-Nazi party Svoboda were generously supported by Washington: “We have invested more than 5 billion dollars to help Ukraine to achieve these and other goals. … We will continue to promote Ukraine to the future it deserves.”

The Western media has casually avoided to analyze the composition and ideological underpinnings of the government coalition. The word “Neo-Nazi” is a taboo. It has been excluded from the dictionary of mainstream media commentary. It will not appear in the pages of the New York Times, the Washington Post or The Independent. Journalists have been instructed not to use the term “Neo-Nazi” to designate Svoboda and the Right Sector.
 
A recent Gallup Poll determined that 1% of Americans are concerned about "Russian collusion."

People may not be much interested in Russia collusion, but 41% think Hillary did it!

Q: On the basis of investigative findings to date [May 2018], which presidential campaign is more likely to have illegally colluded with foreign operatives – Donald Trump’s or Hillary Clinton’s?

Donald Trump: 48%
Hillary Clinton: 41%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...018/who_colluded_with_russia_trump_or_clinton
 
i've found many fact check are not really fact checking -it's a form of fake news not to notate
Javelin and NATO forward positioning

what purpose does yet more sanctions serve except to cripple Russia to limp towards Xi?

The left doesn’t even care about crippling Russia—it’s all about propping up the narrative that the election was illegitimate.

And yes, the ‘fact checkers’ are fake news.
 
People may not be much interested in Russia collusion, but 41% think Hillary did it!

Q: On the basis of investigative findings to date [May 2018], which presidential campaign is more likely to have illegally colluded with foreign operatives – Donald Trump’s or Hillary Clinton’s?

Donald Trump: 48%
Hillary Clinton: 41%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...018/who_colluded_with_russia_trump_or_clinton

Well, there is actual evidence that Hillary colluded with the Russians so yeah lol.
 
Hello Darth,

The left doesn’t even care about crippling Russia—it’s all about propping up the narrative that the election was illegitimate.

And yes, the ‘fact checkers’ are fake news.

No. That is incorrect.

Fact Checkers' job is to verify facts.

Why do you think they call them 'FACT CHECKERS???'

Man. The things some of you people believe.

Sheesh!

Trump believers are the ones who are hooked on fake news.

Here's the Trump party in a nutshell: Fake news yields fake views!
 
The left doesn’t even care about crippling Russia—it’s all about propping up the narrative that the election was illegitimate.

And yes, the ‘fact checkers’ are fake news.
yep. Putin is a convenient foil for asshats like Warner and Blumenthal.
I guess if you say RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA! enough, you can delude yourself that was why Hillary lost.

* if they really cared they'd be talking about Chinese hacking-much more extensive- as well -they don't*
 
Hello Darth,



No. That is incorrect.

Fact Checkers' job is to verify facts.

Why do you think they call them 'FACT CHECKERS???'

Man. The things some of you people believe.

Sheesh!

Trump believers are the ones who are hooked on fake news.

Here's the Trump party in a nutshell: Fake news yields fake views!

Why would a supposed fact checker omit arming Ukrainians to fend off the Russians?

a) they’re incompetent

b) they have an agenda
 
so where is Mueller on that? gone fishing for Trump instead.

Since there’s nothing in Mullet’s mandate that would prevent him from looking at Hillary/DNC and the Russians, one has to entertain the possibility he’s looking at it.

However it’s a remote possibility lol.
 
People may not be much interested in Russia collusion, but 41% think Hillary did it!

Q: On the basis of investigative findings to date [May 2018], which presidential campaign is more likely to have illegally colluded with foreign operatives – Donald Trump’s or Hillary Clinton’s?

Donald Trump: 48%
Hillary Clinton: 41%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...018/who_colluded_with_russia_trump_or_clinton

Hillary Clinton. The Russian collusion story is there to distract from the corruption of the Democrat party. That's the real story.
 
Back
Top