But once again, you're making assumptions of guilt based on ifs and maybes. And that is not how the law works. Its not how the criminal justice system works. If you have some magical hidden evidence that no one has seen yet, that proves guilt without a shadow of a doubt, please provide it. Otherwise wait for Mueller to release whatever it is he has or wait for him to announce there's nothing to find. Until then, you cannot assume guilt. Innocent until proven guilty. Not the other way around.
There's no doubt Russia attacked us.
There's no doubt Roger Stone was in contact with them.
There's no doubt Roger Stone was advising the Trump campaign.
When Stone is indicted, which he will be, it will show that he was in contact with Russia and then relaying those contacts to Trump's people.
I suppose it's just a coincidence that the day Trump asked Russia to hack was the day they actually hacked.


You must have missed the part where Mueller concluded that these attempted hacks had no direct effect on the election process or vote count. No?