Gay marriage ruins it for the rest of us

[CFM]

Cite where you've answered them. I just asked them btw...

Those same questions have been answered throughout the thread. If you're too fucking lazy to read that's your fault. I'm not an enabler of lazy POS like you. We have enough on the left enabling lazy people to get away with doing nothing.

 

[CFM]

See you follow my orders. Answered like yapping little poodle you are. You pathetic daddy fucker.

I gave an order to my inferior. Still waiting on that location and name or are you going to continue making excuses and blaming me for it, coon.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Yes they can and they do.

Next.

good question......what's next?......

 

[Jack]

Who are you to say everyone can live with it?

People like yourself can claim the queers aren't married, THEY have a Civil Union. Your definition of Traditional Marriage will remain intact.
The LGBT Community can claim 'We're married too!" Because they now have gained 'marriage equality'.

The Government using the WORD 'Civil Union' (rather than the WORD 'Marriage') and defining Civil Union (as 'domer76' stated) 'Partners in a Personal Relationship' means anyone who wants to get the 'Government Goodies' can.

 

[Jack]

I love it when you pretend to care; it is a religious ceremony in front of witnesses and the church intended to bond two people in the eyes of God so that they procreate and nurture healthy happy children.

That is why it typically contains, "until death do us part." You see, even people thousands of years ago knew how important FAMILY was and that children need a father and a mother. Preferably the one's who gave them birth.

Part of the problems we see today are due to the fact the societies hedonist party thinks one can be raised by a village or born in a test-tube and it will not have any psychological ramifications. We know that to be a lie.

I agree with the 'Family Unit' and raising children part.

 

[CFM]

People like yourself can claim the queers aren't married, THEY have a Civil Union. Your definition of Traditional Marriage will remain intact.
The LGBT Community can claim 'We're married too!" Because they now have gained 'marriage equality'.

The Government using the WORD 'Civil Union' (rather than the WORD 'Marriage') and defining Civil Union (as 'domer76' stated) 'Partners in a Personal Relationship' means anyone who wants to get the 'Government Goodies' can.

Where have I claimed they have a civil union? I wouldn't give those fags the time of day much less any acknowledgement of their perversion.

The cousin, once he came out, that showed up to my house uninvited with his whatever you call him and was eventually removed in less than a nice way can attest to that.

 

[Jack]

I asked two questions that, while you approached it, you failed to answer both.

Did the best I could. Maybe you can rephrase it and give me a second chance to clarify?

 

[CFM]

Did the best I could. Maybe you can rephrase it and give me a second chance to clarify?

You never addressed anything with the first question and tried to approach the second.

 

[Jack]

What is the 'word'?

In this case "Jesus Freak'. I could have used 'Religious Fundamentalists' or 'Avid Cult Members'.

 

[Truth Detector]

I agree with the 'Family Unit' and raising children part.

Without it, society breaks down and declines. Look at any urban plantation controlled by Democrats in inner cities.

 

[Jack]

Where have I claimed they have a civil union? I wouldn't give those fags the time of day much less any acknowledgement of their perversion.

The cousin, once he came out, that showed up to my house uninvited with his whatever you call him and was eventually removed in less than a nice way can attest to that.

I think your main concern (and those of a religious leaning) is the RE-DEFINITION of 'Marriage'.
The Government using 'Civil Union' removes that concern you have.
I'm I correct here?
Or do you just hate queers and can't stand they are butt-fucking each other somewhere here on the Planet?

 

[Jack]

You never addressed anything with the first question and tried to approach the second.

Do you think you could attempt a second try at asking the two questions?

 

[Jack]

Without it, society breaks down and declines. Look at any urban plantation controlled by Democrats in inner cities.

I support the Ancient Greeks and their conclusion that a 'Family Unit' (the biological Mom and Dad) are the Foundation of Society.

 

[CFM]

I think your main concern (and those of a religious leaning) is the RE-DEFINITION of 'Marriage'.
The Government using 'Civil Union' removes that concern you have.
I'm I correct here?
Or do you just hate queers and can't stand they are butt-fucking each other somewhere here on the Planet?

Again, since when do you think it's your place to think for me? You keep trying and failing.

Civil union still acknowledges perversion. Calling it something else doesn't change what the action is. Do you think calling it a civil union means it's less of a perversion?

I may have said this before. I can take someone chicken shit, put some spices, etc. on it, and call it chicken salad. Does that make it chicken salad and would you eat it because it's called something else?

 

[CFM]

Do you think you could attempt a second try at asking the two questions?

They were asked on a level a first grader could understand. Don't blame the sender when the receiver is broken.

 

[Jack]

Again, since when do you think it's your place to think for me? You keep trying and failing.

Civil union still acknowledges perversion. Calling it something else doesn't change what the action is. Do you think calling it a civil union means it's less of a perversion?

I may have said this before. I can take someone chicken shit, put some spices, etc. on it, and call it chicken salad. Does that make it chicken salad and would you eat it because it's called something else?

1. I'm not trying to think for you. I thought I was responding to your concerns.
2. Oh. OK. You think being queer is a 'perversion'. So, it's NOT about 'marriage' or anything like that. You just hate queers because, ... they're queer. No one is going to be able to help you with THAT.
3. Homosexuality has been around like forever, I think it's in the Bible. You can choose NOT to accept it as part of Humanity, that's entirely YOUR choice.

(oh, a side note here, those that are most voraciously against homosexuals, are usually closet homosexuals that are having an internal fight with themselves)

 

[Jack]

They were asked on a level a first grader could understand. Don't blame the sender when the receiver is broken.

OK.

 

[CFM]

1. I'm not trying to think for you. I thought I was responding to your concerns.
2. Oh. OK. You think being queer is a 'perversion'. So, it's NOT about 'marriage' or anything like that. You just hate queers because, ... they're queer. No one is going to be able to help you with THAT.
3. Homosexuality has been around like forever, I think it's in the Bible. You can choose NOT to accept it as part of Humanity, that's entirely YOUR choice.

(oh, a side note here, those that are most voraciously against homosexuals, are usually closet homosexuals that are having an internal fight with themselves)

1) When you claimed I support civil unions, you are trying to do just that.

2) You're confused. I refuse to acknowledge perversion by any name.

3) It's addressed in the Bible. Sodom and Gomorrah, as an abomination, and the fate of those that choose that lifestyle.

(oh, a side note here, that argument is only for those that are closet homosexuals and can't handle that people don't accept your perversion) BTW, I am just as much against one person murdering another. Based on your logic, which is quite faulty, that would mean you believe I'm a closet murderer.

 

[Jack]

1) When you claimed I support civil unions, you are trying to do just that.

2) You're confused. I refuse to acknowledge perversion by any name.

3) It's addressed in the Bible. Sodom and Gomorrah, as an abomination, and the fate of those that choose that lifestyle.

(oh, a side note here, that argument is only for those that are closet homosexuals and can't handle that people don't accept your perversion) BTW, I am just as much against one person murdering another. Based on your logic, which is quite faulty, that would mean you believe I'm a closet murderer.

1. I never claimed YOU support Civil Unions.
2. OK. Many religious people feel the same way.
3. Yes, it is.

Conclusion: You just Hate queers. It has NOTHING to do with 'gay marriage'. Why are you participating in this thread? ... just to shout "I Hate Queers"?

 

[CFM]

1. I never claimed YOU support Civil Unions.
2. OK. Many religious people feel the same way.
3. Yes, it is.

Conclusion: You just Hate queers. It has NOTHING to do with 'gay marriage'. Why are you participating in this thread? ... just to shout "I Hate Queers"?

1) Post #444 indicates you believe that the term civil union would be OK with me.

You're confused. I oppose perversion and that's one example of perversion.