Your massive ignorance regarding Constitutional issues is obvious.
Your belief that something that isn't in the Constitution actually is proves your stupidity.
Your massive ignorance regarding Constitutional issues is obvious.
Two like genders can enter into some sort of "contract" or "union" and I can not see where that would bother anyone.
But they can not be married, that's just silly
Gay marriage ruins it for the rest of us
I just heard this tonight and probably before, but it is pre 4th of Juuuly. So
How exactly does gay marriage ruin for us heterosexuals? I laughed and the dude, got pissed, but didn't say anything else.
Who cares if fays marry. Seriously.
I don't personally believe in gay marriage, but in this country, they are in fact entitled to it.
And they are entitled to own guns....
Hahhhahaha
How many times you going to repeat that?
If you really want to know...
Marriage is intended as a union of man and woman before God, and nothing else. No sooner could a man marry another man than he could marry his house, and a woman could no sooner marry another woman that she could marry her dog, because she loves it so much. It is the union of two opposite but complimentary elemements to make one whole. In this way gay marriage trivializes the union, "ruining" it for heterosexual couples. And yes, frivolous marriage by other heterosexual couples trivializes it, too.
Not only this, but homosexuality is a sin that disgusts God. Marriage does not reconcile it. The gay community perverts love, making it about sex, saying "I can love anyone I want to!" True, Jesus calls us to love everyone, but not to have sex with anyone. Sex is intended for the marriage of two souls and for making children.
Of course, this is from a theological standpoint. I don't think the church should ever allow gay marriage. However, I don't think the government should have any hand in marriage at all, especially in a country that states freedom of religion as a fundamental right.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
It's funny that you quote the Bible against me, when you've missed a pretty critical part. Jesus says to the Pharisees of the adulterer "Let him who has done no sin cast the first stone." Most people think this is excusing adultery and every other sin, but miss another critical part of the passage: he ends by telling the adulterer "go and sin no more." It's about forgiveness, but with a call to repent.
Read John 8:3-11 for the full story.
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
Wow dude. You have some rather repressed, unnatural and unhealthy views on human sexuality. Seek help!
I could really care less what some uneducated rube from 2,000 years ago has to say. You're views on sex are repressed, unnatural and unhealthy. Seek help.
An Agreement is a contract.............
Two like genders can enter into some sort of "contract" or "union" and I can not see where that would bother anyone.
But they can not be married, that's just silly
Two like genders can enter into some sort of "contract" or "union" and I can not see where that would bother anyone.
But they can not be married, that's just silly
No, two men can not marry each other, that's just silly
No, two men can not marry each other, that's just silly
Your belief that something that isn't in the Constitution actually is proves your stupidity.
No, two men can not marry each other, that's just silly
I am all for Government having a civil ceremony that is the Governments license requirements for property and taxation purposes. But don't call it marriage and redefine the true meaning or purpose.
No, two men can not marry each other, that's just silly
14th Amendment.
Have someone explain it.
They can, they do, and if it was really that important to God, don't you think he'd stop it?