Why do you allow the lies?

I've accepted your challenge, candy ass. Now you don't know what to do with it.

Now you are asking me to defend what you want me to have said...rather than what I actually said.

I'm not asking you to do shit, Frank; because I'm waiting on the MOD's decision on this and am willing to leave JPP forever, if they find that I did indeed hack JV's account like you said I did.
Unlike the poser you are, who is now trying to backpedal from their own comment.
 
I'm not asking you to do shit, Frank; because I'm waiting on the MOD's decision on this and am willing to leave JPP forever, if they find that I did indeed hack JV's account like you said I did.
Unlike the poser you are, who is now trying to backpedal from their own comment.

I NEVER SAID YOU HACKED JV'S ACCOUNT...AND YOU KNOW THAT.

SO IF THEY FIND THAT...IT WILL MEAN NOTHING.

The bet is that YOU...or one of the mods...would prove something I said to be wrong.

Make the pledge that I did.

One of us should leave this forum forever at some point soon.

If you have the spine to make the pledge you are pretending I would not make.

AND WHICH I DID.
 
I NEVER SAID YOU HACKED JV'S ACCOUNT...AND YOU KNOW THAT.

SO IF THEY FIND THAT...IT WILL MEAN NOTHING.

The bet is that YOU...or one of the mods...would prove something I said to be wrong.

Make the pledge that I did.

One of us should leave this forum forever at some point soon.

If you have the spine to make the pledge you are pretending I would not make.

AND WHICH I DID.

You seem awful worried, poser.

Why are so worried?
 
Poor USFREEDOM.

He is a sad, easily triggered, big mouth, no back-up punk.

He has already weaseled out of "the bet"...unless I allow the bet to include stuff I did not say, but he wants included anyway. And rather than have the guts to make a pledge to leave if he cannot prove my comments wrong...he wants to leave it up to the moderators...who probably would not ban him on this account.
 
He is a sad, easily triggered, big mouth, no back-up punk.

He has already weaseled out of "the bet"...unless I allow the bet to include stuff I did not say, but he wants included anyway. And rather than have the guts to make a pledge to leave if he cannot prove my comments wrong...he wants to leave it up to the moderators...who probably would not ban him on this account.

Why are so scared, poser?

No weaseling on my part and I've offered nothing that you didn't say; because the quotes are right there, in the tread.
 
Part of your link; perhaps you should just kill yourself? No one would miss you I am sure. :rofl2:

Because of a decades-old court decision, called the Flores Settlement, immigrant children must be held under the “least restrictive” settings possible, which means they cannot be detained for long periods of time with their parents.

If a mother and child enter the U.S. illegally, the mother is sent to a federal jail or other detention center to await prosecution. Since children cannot be held in an adult facility, they’re put into the custody of the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement.

People seeking asylum aren't immigrating illegally.
 
I voted against no bill.

And now here comes the walk-back on your part.

So you started out by trying to say that Democrats didn't care about immigrants when they had the majority. Then, when it was revealed to you that they did in fact address it while they had majority in the Senate, and that Conservatives were the ones who voted against their own bill, you employ the deflection of how you, personally, didn't vote against it - the people you voted for and support did. So you are trying to distance yourself and abdicate responsibility because you realized you just got caught in your own faulty rhetoric. Doesn't work with me, man. I am holding you equally responsible for failing to address immigration because the people you supported and voted for did.

So why do you not care about immigrant children, Nazi? Is it because you're a Nazi?
 
Why didn't DEMOCRATS pass the bill when they controlled Congress and the White House?

They tried to. You all refused to do anything. You're the ones who voted against your own bill. So it's your fault. And I hold you personally responsible for that because you voted for these Republicans.
 
They passed Obamacare without a singe Republican vote.

And when they did and it was executed, Democrats didn't have enough votes to overcome the filibuster. That super-majority ended when Scott Brown was seated, before Obamacare was signed into law.

You don't remember this? It was only 8 years ago. Maybe lay off the meth since it seems to be leading to memory loss.
 
Last edited:
Prove it, Brad.

I've seen nothing in the media, the Insurance Commissioner is mute on the subject.

Present your evidence - if it exists.

Im not telling you who I am. Just because you did not see anything does not mean I did not do anything.
 
Yet they didn't pass the immigration reform they claim they want when they had the chance

Obamacare was passed in committee before Scott Brown was seated. Once Brown was seated, the bill passed by a 59-41 vote. 59 votes isn't enough to overcome a filibuster. Obama and the Democrats only had a super-majority in the Senate for a total of 60 legislative days.

Weird how you don't remember any of this. Maybe you have brain damage.
 
How could Republicans deny Obama a victory on immigration since they were unable to prevent Obamacare?

Because between the time Obamacare passed committee, and by the time it cleared final passage in the Senate, Scott Brown was seated and reduced the Democratic majority down to 59-41.

Sad you don't remember that. It was only 8 years ago. Fascism has the unintended side effect of memory loss too, it seems.
 
Back
Top