How do you make all those guns unavailable. Just remember when you take away guns the thugs will still have them
Have you noticed that nobody uses true machine guns in today’s shootings? Why do you suppose that is?
How do you make all those guns unavailable. Just remember when you take away guns the thugs will still have them
YEP and if you use your limited mental abilities, you'll be able to understand that it was in reply to two separate posts.![]()
His abilities are so limited he wouldn't be able to understand that.
In your partisan biased opinion
You either overlooked or ran away from this.
Do you have the cognitive ability to respond with an intelligent answer?
How did that work, where in the last one a shotgun and revolvers were used??




So you think he is doing this without making money at it? He is after all a democrat
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...-control-demonstrations-lawmakers-town-halls/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...and-shooting-anguish-into-activism/381319002/
http://thefederalist.com/2018/03/01/take-two-weeks-truth-emerge-parkland-students-astroturfing/
Wrong, dumbfuck. It keeps the screen clean from proven worthless shitweasels.
Wrong, dumbfuck. It keeps the screen clean from proven worthless shitweasels.
Using the same words in two posts is a sign of a lazy ass hole.
Only for an intelligent member, which you're not. It's how I reply to anal retentive imbeciles like you.

Wrong, dumbfuck. It keeps the screen clean from proven worthless shitweasels.
Have you noticed that nobody uses true machine guns in today’s shootings? Why do you suppose that is?
Next rwnut in line please!![]()
Gotta love how fucking stupid one must be to keep replying when they know their posts are blank.
Priceless stupidity. Industrial strength stupidity.
First of all, Breitbart and The Federalist are radical extremist far right media sources and the articles are the opinions of one writer, not fact. If you read these media sources often, it's no wonder you're a radicalized pawn of the far right.
Second, no where in any of the articles do they insinuate that Hogg is "a pawn of the democrats".
In fact, Hogg himself says in one of the articles:
David Hogg, a Parkland survivor and one of the March for Our Lives organizers, said this goes for Republican and Democratic Congress members — they want all 435 representatives to participate. If not, primary and general elections opponents will be invited to attend in their places, or activists will consider holding an “empty chair town hall” to call attention to their absence. “We’re not for Democrats or Republicans,” Hogg said. “We’re simply trying to save kids.”
Nice try but you failed miserably. Not surprising since you radicalized right wing nut jobs seem to have a problem with word comprehension, just like most backwoods hillbillies.
![]()
No it means you ignore those that show you wrong. If you were honest you would admit when you are wrong. But then we know democrats don't have enough integrity for that
Because they are not accurate. Bump stocks are cheaper
Priceless!
Here’s the way it is, dimwit. The ignorant fucks in my ignore list are nothing more than low life pieces of lying shit. They contribute nothing, much less doing something than proving me wrong.
You appear to be a great candidate for that group. You’ve already qualified for the Illiterate Dumbfuck Club. Thd next step is ‘ignore’.
lol
Wrong again, idiot.
Do you practice at stupid or does it come naturally?