Comey withheld who funded dossier.

kudzu said:
Paul Simpson has testified that he ordered the dossier..

You are lying all over yourself today.. The dossier was written from June to December of 2016.
Click to expand...
Glen Simpson not "Paul". you need to start attributing your assertions
 
Ironically, Hillary is the one who conspired with a foreign government to affect the outcome of a US election.

Will be so poetic when that shoe finally hits her in the butt.
As soon as this nothing burger on Trump finishes cooking

Patience grasshopper
 
noise said:
WHAT?? what are you rambling on about? Tump's Russian mafia connections..?
get out of here with that trash.

Steele colluded with the Russians ( who fed him dezinformatsiya ) and Clinton paid for it
why are you chasing this wild rabbit?
Click to expand...

:0) I'm not the least bit interested in blind ignorance of truth and fear of logical questions.

If you can't answer the really simple question .. it's exactly what I expected.

Mueller is closing in, and all your whining about it doesn't mean one damn thing.
 
blackascoal said:
:0) I'm not the least bit interested in blind ignorance of truth and fear of logical questions.

If you can't answer the really simple question .. it's exactly what I expected.

Mueller is closing in, and all your whining about it doesn't mean one damn thing.
Click to expand...
as opposed to your whining? for 2 years straight?
So now left wing nut-jobs decide who can whine and who can't

I see :rofl2:
 
blackascoal said:
What difference would it make?

For giggles, let's say 100 billion dollars. What difference does that make?

Shouldn't you be challenging the information, not how much it cost?

How much were republicans paying for it? What difference does it make?
Click to expand...

Clinton was a candidate and the dossier is fake.
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... we know NOW who funded it.

No, it is not factual. It is a bunch of made up nonsense.

Yes, the witch hunt continues.
Click to expand...

Yes, it's a witch hunt because Trump is of such glowing character that he would never engage in such activity. :0) Who do you think believes that bullshit?

Would complaining about how the information was obtained all you have .. or do you challenge the evidence that Trump is surrounded by Russians?
 
noise said:
Cite your "snippets"..did you actually do research? *no*

using ANY PART OF the dossier when the PROTOCOL is "verified and documented" invalidates the application
Click to expand...


The dossier was a collection of 17 memos written from June to December 2016.
 
the dossier was funded by Clinton, was fake, and was used to try and sway the outcome of a US election, for president no less.

these are cold hard facts, the hammer will drop wheels of justice are slow but they turn
 
blackascoal said:
Yes, it's a witch hunt because Trump is of such glowing character that he would never engage in such activity. :0) Who do you think believes that bullshit?

Would complaining about how the information was obtained all you have .. or do you challenge the evidence that Trump is surrounded by Russians?
Click to expand...

No, Trump is def not a high character individual. That does not alter the fact that the whole collusion nonsense evolved into a witch hunt.

yes, I would love to see your evidence that Trump is surrounded by Russians.
 
(A) knowingly engages in clandestine intelligence gathering activities for or on behalf of a foreign power, which activities involve or may involve a violation of the criminal statutes of the United States;

(B) pursuant to the direction of an intelligence service or network of a foreign power, knowingly engages in any other clandestine intelligence activities for or on behalf of such foreign power, which activities involve or are about to involve a violation of the criminal statutes of the United States;

[snip]

(E) knowingly aids or abets any person in the conduct of activities described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) or knowingly conspires with any person to engage in activities described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C).

That’s the standard that — given that Page had been warned by FBI in 2013 that he was being recruited — might be fairly easily within reach for Page. I suspect we’ll eventually learn (after whatever brouhaha ensues) that FBI claimed Page was either aiding or abetting Russian spies, or conspiring with them, not that he was a spy himself. But that’s a distinction that may be lost on Republicans trying to politicize this.

https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/01/...t-need-to-be-a-spy-to-be-targeted-under-fisa/
 
noise said:
Glen Simpson not "Paul". you need to start attributing your assertions
Click to expand...

My mistake... Paul Singer.

Steve Bannon reportedly trying to destroy hedge fund giant Paul Singer

https://www.cnbc.com/.../steve-bannon-reportedly-trying-to-destroy-hedge-fund-giant...

Oct 30, 2017 - Former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon is working hard to destroy hedge fund titan Paul Singer, according to a report from Axios. Bannon told President Donald Trump during a phone call Friday night that he was going "off the chain" to destroy Singer. Singer is a major Republican donor and the ...
Paul Singer Says Pa
 
The Trump administration is up to its neck in Russians
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...-its-neck-in-russians/?utm_term=.5bb3e595f7c2

Mueller team asks about Trump's Russian business dealings as he weighed a run for president
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/27/politics/trump-russia-investigation/index.html

Russia: Trump & His Team’s Ties

Trump-His-Teams-Ties-to-Russia-4-4.png

https://swalwell.house.gov/issues/russia-trump-his-administration-s-ties
 
kudzu said:
(A) knowingly engages in clandestine intelligence gathering activities for or on behalf of a foreign power, which activities involve or may involve a violation of the criminal statutes of the United States;

(B) pursuant to the direction of an intelligence service or network of a foreign power, knowingly engages in any other clandestine intelligence activities for or on behalf of such foreign power, which activities involve or are about to involve a violation of the criminal statutes of the United States;

[snip]

(E) knowingly aids or abets any person in the conduct of activities described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) or knowingly conspires with any person to engage in activities described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C).
Click to expand...

but I thought you liked Clinton
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top