MUELLER invest'g SUITCASES/DUFFELs full of CASH from Russia & Putin to Trump campaign

Centerleftfl

Verified User
MUELLER invest'g SUITCASES/DUFFELs full of CASH from Russia & Putin to Trump campaign

I think it is safe to say that PUTIN WANTED TRUMP TO WIN! Follow the money! Note the very last sentence. There has never been an accounting of TRUMP'S MASSIVE inauguration fund. They've refused. Hey RACHEL (Maddow), WHERE ARE YOU?? She's been mentioning this periodically for months.

Either way, their story suggests that one way Russia might have injected money into the
American political system for the 2016 election and beyond was not via traceable and accountable electronic transfers, but
the old-fashioned delivery of cold, hard cash.

Flying around stacks of cash is a time-honored way to get money into circulation in a distant place with no one in between learning about it — most of the time.

If Russian officials were shipping cash to the United States in 2016 for deposit in American bank accounts, which were then the apparently legitimate points of origination
for payments to political campaigns or political action committees, it could have been a powerful and deniable source of influence.


The Russia Investigations: On The Hunt For Duffel Bags Full Of Cash
April 7, 20187:00 AM ET
PHILIP EWING

Investigations: Mueller sends the feds to meet some international arrivees; new sanctions on some powerful, wealthy Russians; and Mr. Zuckerberg goes to Washington. A gleaming new Gulfstream 650 — or maybe it's a Sukhoi business jet — sweeps in for a landing at Teterboro Airport, the suburban New Jersey entrepôt for elite fliers on their way to nearby Manhattan. The sleek aircraft turns smartly off the runway and heads for the "executive passenger terminal," where a row of black vehicles is parked and waiting as usual. But when the hatch folds down to permit passengers to deplane and make their short drive into New York, someone is standing in the way:

That, at least, was the scene painted in an exclusive report by CNN's Kara Scannell and Shimon Prokupecz. Mueller himself might not be standing on the tarmac, but FBI investigators from his office have interdicted at least two wealthy Russians recently on their way into the United States, they report.
Article continues after sponsorship

The special counsel's office is apparently trying to establish whether powerful Russians who owe fealty to President Vladimir Putin — the oft-referenced "oligarchs" —may have funneled cash donations to President Trump's campaign or his inauguration fund.


The Russia Sanctions Saga: Weapons Dealers, Mobsters And Suitcases Full Of Cash

On Friday, the Treasury Department targeted some of those same oligarchs for a new round of sanctions, along with a number of other Russian government officials and entities — including the state weapons exporter. And here was the description Treasury gave of the conduct of one targeted Russian, gold baron Suleiman Kerimov:

"He is alleged to have brought hundreds of millions of euros into France – transporting as much as 20 million Euros at a time in suitcases, in addition to conducting more conventional funds transfers – without reporting the money to French tax authorities.

More money, more problems

That pattern of conduct, and the nature of the interdictions described by Scannell and Prokupecz, raise questions about how long this smuggling of cash might have gone on. The CNN story suggests investigators want to know whether it might have gone into Trump's inauguration accounts — or whether it continues to this day....

https://www.npr.org/2018/04/07/6002...ions-on-the-hunt-for-duffel-bags-full-of-cash


PS 20,000,000 Euros = $24,597,000.00 (US Dollars). That's a whole lot of suitcases and duffel bags!
 
Last edited:
That is a whole lot of ifs and maybes.

IOW, pure bullshit speculation.

No ifs or maybes. It happened. NOW Mueller will nail down all the 'whos', the 'wheres', the 'whens' and the 'WHY'! (And the 'how much's')

This isn't hard people.
 
that pattern of conduct, and the nature of the interdictions described by Scannell and Prokupecz, raise questions about how long this smuggling of cash might have gone on. The CNN story suggests investigators want to know whether it might have gone into Trump's inauguration accounts — or whether it continues to this day....
so smuggling cash into France IMMEDIATELY brings to mind illegal foreign contribution to the Trump campaign?

I guess if you believe "Russian collusion" you'll believe anything :rolleyes:
 
so smuggling cash into France IMMEDIATELY brings to mind illegal foreign contribution to the Trump campaign?

I guess if you believe "Russian collusion" you'll believe anything :rolleyes:

I would think in the age of DIGITAL 'ANY' EUROS or FRANCS bought in quantity by RUSSIANS (or ANYONE) might just leave a 'digital trail'. And then somewhere someone some entity had to convert it to paper. Another 'trail'? Although I guess Mueller could have made that up too. Sure why not. That's perfectly logical. All a big scam by a decorated Marine, a lifelong Republican, FBI director with 'impeccable credentials'----at least up until JUN 2016?
 
Last edited:
I would think in the age of DIGITAL 'everything' EUROS bought in quantity by RUSSIANS (or ANYONE) might just leave a 'digital trail'. And then somewhere someone some entity had to convert it to paper. Another 'trail'? Although I guess Mueller could have made that up too. Sure why not. That's perfectly logical. All a big scam by a decorated Marine, a lifelong Republican, FBI director with 'impeccable credentials'----at least up until JUN 2016?
I don't see Mueller's name listed in the article
 
I would think in the age of DIGITAL 'everything' EUROS bought in quantity by RUSSIANS (or ANYONE) might just leave a 'digital trail'. And then somewhere someone some entity had to convert it to paper. Another 'trail'? Although I guess Mueller could have made that up too. Sure why not. That's perfectly logical. All a big scam by a decorated Marine, a lifelong Republican, FBI director with 'impeccable credentials'----at least up until JUN 2016?

nothing-burger.jpg
 
Lindsey Graham says they better not be 'touched'. Remember there are 2 BIPARTISAN BILLS 'sitting in a drawer' ready to be enacted if Trump threatens to fire Mueller.

I'm not suggesting Trump fire Mueller. Nor do I give a shit what Goober has to say. The scope of the original intention of this investigation has gone off the deep end. Mueller even admitted Trump is not the subject of a criminal investigation. This is not how it's done, and this banana republic bullshit shouldn't be tolerated by Americans. Which is why you and your ilk love this stuff, because you are unAmerican pieces of dogshit.
 
I'm not suggesting Trump fire Mueller. Nor do I give a shit what Goober has to say. The scope of the original intention of this investigation has gone off the deep end. Mueller even admitted Trump is not the subject of a criminal investigation. This is not how it's done, and this banana republic bullshit shouldn't be tolerated by Americans. Which is why you and your ilk love this stuff, because you are unAmerican pieces of dogshit.
Mueller said Trump is not a target. He is under investigation an suspicion.
 
I'm not suggesting Trump fire Mueller. Nor do I give a shit what Goober has to say. The scope of the original intention of this investigation has gone off the deep end. Mueller even admitted Trump is not the subject of a criminal investigation. This is not how it's done, and this banana republic bullshit shouldn't be tolerated by Americans. Which is why you and your ilk love this stuff, because you are unAmerican pieces of dogshit.


LOLOL.. You think money laundering and tax evasion are American values?
 
Mueller said Trump is not a target. He is under investigation an suspicion.

Not how criminal investigations work. You must have reasonable suspicion of a crime. If Trump is not a target, there is no reasonable suspicion of a crime. There was absolutely no need for a special counsel.
 
I'm not suggesting Trump fire Mueller. Nor do I give a shit what Goober has to say. The scope of the original intention of this investigation has gone off the deep end. Mueller even admitted Trump is not the subject of a criminal investigation. This is not how it's done, and this banana republic bullshit shouldn't be tolerated by Americans. Which is why you and your ilk love this stuff, because you are unAmerican pieces of dogshit.
:hand:
 
outstanding posts countryboy.. very well said.

Trump is not a target of the investigation. Rosenstein extended the authorization to include Manafort's activities way back when he was a lobbyist for the Ukraine's "Party of Regions"..more FBI shenanigans.

I'm pretty sure Brennan shopped the steele dossier around as well..and he knew it was unverified.
But I don't want to say anything more that detracts form your posts..well said again
 
Not how criminal investigations work. You must have reasonable suspicion of a crime. If Trump is not a target, there is no reasonable suspicion of a crime. There was absolutely no need for a special counsel.

Keep repeating that last line.

You may eventually convince yourself of it.

I doubt you will convince anyone with a functioning brain, though.
 
Back
Top