A 9-year-old boy shot his older sister to death over a video game controller, sheriff

smb said:
Spoken like a true idiot.
Click to expand...

I was trying to be polite but since you are just another asshole apparently; it is your argument that is truly idiotic ans such has been pointed out to you by various other posters for 5 pages already.

Waste your energy on this one, one less idiot to contend with.
 
Rune said:
I was trying to be polite but since you are just another asshole apparently; it is your argument that is truly idiotic ans such has been pointed out to you by various other posters for 5 pages already.

Waste your energy on this one, one less idiot to contend with.
Click to expand...

See ya. I love it when people post stupid shit and then try to pawn it off as something else. Go hang out with racist cohorts CFM and Volsrock. You can all grab pictures of dear Adolf and have a circle jerk.
 
Yaya said:
The manufacturer should be liable for those killed by enemy fire, right?
Click to expand...

Yes, I agree. Like tobacco was responsible for selling a deadly product. Tobacco lied and covered up while using their lobbying power to prevent the people from knowing the truth. So, yeah, same thing.
 
smb said:
Another dumb ass non-sequitur. If someone who owns the gun fires the gun it is on them. If you buy a weapon and they don't have a lock on it and someone takes your gun because you left it in the open and uses then the owner and the manufacturer are liable. You keep presenting nonsense. This is easy. If you purchase a gun the gun manufacturer should have the duty to ensure that gun is only used by it proper owner. It is an easy fix in which the technology exist to do so. Regardless of how purposefully you are being obtuse.
Click to expand...

Cite
 
smb said:
Apparently you don't know what a non-sequitur is. I really didn't expect you would. Most trumpchumps are dumber than a box of rocks.
Click to expand...

So you're reduced to "I know you are but what am I".
Thanks Pee Wee Herman.

Apparently, non sequitur is the only form of logical fallacy you are familiar with. False equivalence would be what you're looking for. You're welcome, dumbass.
 
Last edited:
Sirthinksalot said:
So you're reduced to "I know you are but what am I".
Thanks Pee Wee Herman.

Apparently, non sequitur is the only form of logical fallacy you are familiar with. False equivalence would be what you're looking for. You're welcome, dumbass.
Click to expand...

Nope. Just telling it like it is. I thought you trumpchumps were all for that?
 
Sirthinksalot said:
So you're reduced to "I know you are but what am I".
Thanks Pee Wee Herman.

Apparently, non sequitur is the only form of logical fallacy you are familiar with. False equivalence would be what you're looking for. You're welcome, dumbass.
Click to expand...

its Francis who misuses the tactic


you are the francis'
 
The homicide rate has been estimated to be over 30 per 100,000 people in 1700, dropping to under 20 by 1800, and to under 10 by 1900.[6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States

30 per 100,000 people in 1700....All those murders and no guns

Homicide rate in Amsterdam, for example, was 47 per 100,000 people in the mid-15th century(NO GUNS AROUND).... to 1 to 1.5 per 100,000 in the early 19th century(GUNS AROUND)
 
Nordberg said:
23 kids a day are shot. Guns kill a lot more innocent lives than you believe they save. Let kids die as long as you can have a home arsenal. Your children and family are in more danger if you have guns around the home.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, shitbag, but you as a supporter of abortion have zero ground to stand on. You don't give a shit about human lives. all you want is to take guns away from responsible owners. Destroying the 2nd amendment is your ONLY purpose.

You're a shill. A government whore. And you have ZERO ground to stand on.

No, guns are here to stay, and they will be needed, as society continues its decline.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top