A question for federal agency integrity buffs

Trump & his surrogates have engaged in a coordinated effort to completely undermine the FBI as well as our intel community, because of his ego.

That is total bullshit. What is it about you lefties and your propensity to fabricate pure unadulterated bullshit? That is rhetorical of course.

It is the FBI and Intel community who have undermined themselves by allowing partisan asshats to operate as if they are some sub-government and can decide the outcome of an election based on bullshit, unauthorized leaks, lies, and distortions.

So, let's start w/ an honest premise.

There is nothing honest about your emotional outburst or the FAKE medias narrative.

But I get it....you have a serious case of butthurt and .....

Trump Derangement Syndrome. :rofl2:
 
Sounds like you're just trying to be snarky.

If you want to engage in any serious discussion on the topic, just let me know.

I’m here to have one.

The best thing you have is Trump taking to Twitter to harp on the demonstrable faults by certain parties within in some of these agencies. Strzok was deserving of condemnation—and he sure as hell wouldn’t get it from the Trump hating media. Trump spiked the ball on McCabe—while at the same time, standing behind the rank and file agents.

According to the agency’s internal ethics committee, McCabe was less than candorous on several occasions. Which is a polite way of saying he got caught lying. You’re a stickler about that sort of thing, right? He was fired, and it was a great day for democracy.

It seems your problem is with Trump pointing out the obvious.
 
Mostly because we have seen no evidence against him you retard.
you haven't seen bogus FISA applications supported by the Steele dossier, yet you believe them to be above board.
Your outrage is selective and partisan
 
He won't lose his pension, that's just more bullshit. It just means he can't take it at 50, how bloody sad. Can you tell any sector of private industry where you can take a pension at such a ridiculous early age anyway?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk

He wasn't working for a business.

Why should a lifelong civil servant have to wait 12 years to collect his due because an orange haired monster is desperate to stay out of jail
 
you haven't seen bogus FISA applications supported by the Steele dossier, yet you believe them to be above board.
Your outrage is selective and partisan

No I don't and will not until I see them, unlike you who just connects the dots.
 
They have done what they're supposed to do. If an agent or employee acts unethically, they have taken action.

What Trump has done to try to tarnish the reputation of these vital agencies is disgraceful for a sitting President. Stop making excuses for his behavior.

This bullshit is as laughable as the left's newfound morality. A political ideology that has always attacked the FBI and intel community now finds them to be the pinnacle of integrity. :rofl2:

:legion:
 
I’m here to have one.

The best thing you have is Trump taking to Twitter to harp on the demonstrable faults by certain parties within in some of these agencies. Strzok was deserving of condemnation—and he sure as hell wouldn’t get it from the Trump hating media. Trump spiked the ball on McCabe—while at the same time, standing behind the rank and file agents.

According to the agency’s internal ethics committee, McCabe was less than candorous on several occasions. Which is a polite way of saying he got caught lying. You’re a stickler about that sort of thing, right? He was fired, and it was a great day for democracy.

It seems your problem is with Trump pointing out the obvious.

You make his tweets on the subject sound much more specific and rational than they have been.

It's extremely dishonest. Or, you're just in denial about what he has written.
 
I’m here to have one.

The best thing you have is Trump taking to Twitter to harp on the demonstrable faults by certain parties within in some of these agencies. Strzok was deserving of condemnation—and he sure as hell wouldn’t get it from the Trump hating media. Trump spiked the ball on McCabe—while at the same time, standing behind the rank and file agents.

According to the agency’s internal ethics committee, McCabe was less than candorous on several occasions. Which is a polite way of saying he got caught lying. You’re a stickler about that sort of thing, right? He was fired, and it was a great day for democracy.

It seems your problem is with Trump pointing out the obvious.
yeppers..
this is the same crowd who say the FBI is sacrosanct and above criticism when it comes to what Nunes pointed out.

Conspiracies, lying by omission on the Steele dossier use for FISA aps, and never criticizing the grotesque partisanship that led to paying Russians by the Clinton campaign for the Steele dossier itself.
all that is just fine and dandy.

But when the FBI's Internal Affairs finds enough wrong to actually fire Mccabe,,
he becomes some kina hero to the resistance.

I's just more TDS.
 
I’m here to have one.

The best thing you have is Trump taking to Twitter to harp on the demonstrable faults by certain parties within in some of these agencies. Strzok was deserving of condemnation—and he sure as hell wouldn’t get it from the Trump hating media. Trump spiked the ball on McCabe—while at the same time, standing behind the rank and file agents.

According to the agency’s internal ethics committee, McCabe was less than candorous on several occasions. Which is a polite way of saying he got caught lying. You’re a stickler about that sort of thing, right? He was fired, and it was a great day for democracy.

It seems your problem is with Trump pointing out the obvious.

The FBI isn't polite, retard.
If he lied, they would have said so.
 
Sounds like you're just trying to be snarky.

If you want to engage in any serious discussion on the topic, just let me know.

Wrong again; he is pointing at your glaring hypocrisy and stupidity and laughing. But we get it, you have a serious case of.....

Trump Derangement Syndrome. :rofl2:
 
No I don't and will not until I see them, unlike you who just connects the dots.
ah. so you don't see the OPR's exact recommendations ( summarized by Sessions in his firing statement) yet you know they must be questioned, yet you willingly swallow the fact the FISA applications were 100% above board without seeing them.
Your mind is rubbish.
 
Back
Top