It's Flowers for Dicks

I can't see any reason to sell assault-style rifles ; they are for wanna-be rambos
 
Last edited:
noise said:
I can't see any reason to sell assault-style rifles ; they are for wanna-be rambos
Click to expand...

Funny you should say that.

OVMFcPN.jpg
 
noise said:
I can't see any reason to sell assault-style rifles ; they are for wanna-be rambos
Click to expand...

As far as I'm concerned the self-defense thing is just a sign of mental illness. 3 to 6 shots is all you're going to need the bad guy is either dead or long gone. If I was out hunting and saw a guy with an AR-15 I'd head for the car and go home because that was a dangerous spot to be. A 10 to 12 gauge or a 30 ought 6 or 22 is all you need for hunting
 
katzgar said:
As far as I'm concerned the self-defense thing is just a sign of mental illness. 3 to 6 shots is all you're going to need the bad guy is either dead or long gone. If I was out hunting and saw a guy with an AR-15 I'd head for the car and go home because that was a dangerous spot to be. A 10 to 12 gauge or a 30 ought 6 or 22 is all you need for hunting
Click to expand...

Maybe even a spear, eh ? Let's keep it fair.
 
katzgar said:
As far as I'm concerned the self-defense thing is just a sign of mental illness. 3 to 6 shots is all you're going to need the bad guy is either dead or long gone. If I was out hunting and saw a guy with an AR-15 I'd head for the car and go home because that was a dangerous spot to be. A 10 to 12 gauge or a 30 ought 6 or 22 is all you need for hunting
Click to expand...

That's because you are correct, one does not require an AR-15 for home or self-defense. As for hunting, much of it is conducted with equivalent or more powerful rifles. People do not have the right to own a AR-15 for either purpose, however. It is simply an option they have due to the individual right stemming from the 2nd Amendment.
 
Threedee said:
That's because you are correct, one does not require an AR-15 for home or self-defense. As for hunting, much of it is conducted with equivalent or more powerful rifles. People do not have the right to own a AR-15 for either purpose, however. It is simply an option they have due to the individual right stemming from the 2nd Amendment.
Click to expand...
banning it does not reduce carnage ( we did this already)..
but I can't see any reason not to either..it's a cosmetic step for a cosmetic change to a semi-automatic
 
Threedee said:
That's because you are correct, one does not require an AR-15 for home or self-defense. As for hunting, much of it is conducted with equivalent or more powerful rifles. People do not have the right to own a AR-15 for either purpose, however. It is simply an option they have due to the individual right stemming from the 2nd Amendment.
Click to expand...


the regulation of guns has been upheld by the Scotus
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top