Report: Mueller’s investigation takes a bizarre turn

Darth Omar said:
Steele used unverified Russian sources.

Yet, you are so trusting of them lol.
Click to expand...

Steele had little if anything to do with this investigation, however its interesting that nothing in this dossier has ever been show to be untrue.
Is there any end you wont go to to try and discredit this investigation? If you were really confident in the innocence of all parties involved, you would welcome an investigation.
 
volsrock said:
The Washington Post reports that Robert Mueller is investigating President Trump’s “private comments and state of mind” during the period when he issued a series of tweets belittling Attorney General Jeff Sessions. According to the Post, the thrust of Mueller’s inquiry is to determine whether the president’s goal was to oust Sessions in order to pick a replacement who would exercise control over Mueller’s investigation.

If this story is true, it demonstrates why the nation needs someone in the Justice Department to exercise control over Mueller’s investigation. It also confirms the suspicion that Mueller is either nuts, desperate to get Trump, or both.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/03/report-muellers-investigation-takes-a-bizarre-turn.php


Looks like Mueller is running out of things to ‘investigate’. Next, will he start investigating the tides, the orbit of the earth and what the local astrologers have to say about Trumps actions?

Trump needs to shut this so-called investigation down now.
Click to expand...





Um dude


state of mind is part of every single crime investigation ever investigated


that is FACT

will you accept FACT?
 
noise said:
a "matter"
( Lynch told Comey not to call it an "investigation" while the FBI was investigating Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server)
Click to expand...

because there was no crime to investigate


they were investigating if it had remained secure

you just hate so you see shit that is not real
 
christiefan915 said:
It was investigated. Two people spoke to each other. What else would an investigation show, there was no taping and no writing to use as proof of wrongdoing.
Click to expand...

The meeting itself was wrongdoing....the AG secretly meeting with the husband of the women she was investigating....

Sessions just saying hello to a Russian was enough for pinheads to demand his resignation as AG in the beginning....
 
Darth Omar said:
Steele used unverified Russian sources.

Yet, you are so trusting of them lol.
Click to expand...

he used the same sources he had used during his service as one of the worlds most trusted british agents


BTW many things in it have proven TRUE


your hate of him doesn't make them false
 
NOVA said:
The meeting itself was wrongdoing....the AG meeting with the husband of the women she was investigating....

Sessions just saying hello to a Russian was enough for pinheads to demand his resignation as AG in the beginning....
Click to expand...

how many times did he say hello to a Russian for 30 minutes and then lie about it under oath?
 
Darth Omar said:
Assange claims they were leaked and not hacked. And he’s adamant about it.

He has no dog in the fight so why would Assange lie?
Click to expand...

Assange wouldn't lie and we even know who it was. It was the consultants hired by the DNC who sold the info they stole. This is why the DNC did not want the FBI looking at their server.

In a plot Tom Clancy might have dreamed up, an IT staffer who’d worked for Democrats in Congress was arrested by federal officials and charged with bank fraud. Fox News has reported that officers and agents from the U.S. Capitol Police, the FBI and Customs and Border Protection, were involved in the arrest of Imran Awan at Dulles International Airport not far from Washington, D.C., as he tried to fly away to Pakistan.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/frankm...p-wasserman-schultz-can-explain/#77490dfb4414
 
floridaFOOL said:
Steele had little if anything to do with this investigation, however its interesting that nothing in this dossier has ever been show to be untrue.
Is there any end you wont go to to try and discredit this investigation? If you were really confident in the innocence of all parties involved, you would welcome an investigation.
Click to expand...

....because you say so. There, I fixed this massive pile of leftist bile for you.
 
how many times did Sessions say hello to a Russian for 30 minutes and then lie about it under oath?
 
evince said:
how many times did he say hello to a Russian for 30 minutes and then lie about it under oath?
Click to expand...
NONE !
Yeah, yeah, yeah....they wanted him to list "any contact" he or his family had with a "foreign government" or its "representatives" over the past seven years....total bullshit requirement to begin with.....
He or his family, over 7 years ? Give me a freakin' break..

Sessions initially listed a year's worth of meetings with foreign officials on the security clearance form, according to Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores. But she says he and his staff were then told by an FBI employee who assisted in filling out the form, known as the SF-86, that he didn't need to list dozens of meetings with foreign ambassadors that happened in his capacity as a senator.

After CNN's story published, a spokesman responded to the reporting with a statement, saying that Sessions was instructed not to list meetings like the ones with Kislyak on his form.
"As a United States Senator, the Attorney General met hundreds -- if not thousands -- of foreign dignitaries and their staff," spokesman Ian Prior said. "In filling out the SF-86 form, the Attorney General's staff consulted with those familiar with the process, as well as the FBI investigator handling the background check, and was instructed not to list meetings with foreign dignitaries and their staff connected with his Senate activities."

https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/24/politics/jeff-sessions-russian-officials-meetings/index.html
 
Truth Detector said:
When was talking to a Russian against the law?....I can wait.
Click to expand...

since your fucking party started placing Putin over country and working with the Russians of fuck up our elections


why did your party invite Russian spys to your party nominating convention?


then change your platform to please the Russians Dictator
 
evince said:
since your fucking party started placing Putin over country and working with the Russians of fuck up our elections


why did your party invite Russian spys to your party nominating convention?


then change your platform to please the Russians Dictator
Click to expand...

Trump didn't pay the Russians for a phony dossier to get dirt on an election opponent......Hillary and the DNC did...and that ain't even remotely deniable...its proven FACT...

and how about a link to prove RNC 'invited' Russians to nominating convention....
 
Darth Omar said:
No, but this isn’t the Watergate investigation either.

Recall that Watergate started with an actual crime. There was no shady Russian Dossier that provided the impetus for the Watergate investigation. I could go on. It’s a lame comparison. About the only thing you could say is they are/were both investigations lol.

I’m pretty sure Trump realizes the political downside to ending it. The best approach is to undermine Mueller. That’s where Sessions comes in.
Click to expand...

The crime was a petty breaking and entering. The feds don’t get involved with that. Just as in this case, they began an investigation and uncovered REAL crimes.

Is this getting a little too close to home, grasshopper?
 
Darth Omar said:
Steele used unverified Russian sources.

Yet, you are so trusting of them lol.
Click to expand...

Yawning.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top