Question for Trump & Trumptards re: giving teachers guns....

[Nomad]

Given the fact(s) that....

A) ...bullets don't always hit their intended target, or....

B) ...they often times pass through their target (in this case, soft human tissue) barely even slowing down, then strike some non-intended target (like another person) on the other side, and....

C) ....they are known to ricochet around, again, often striking some non-intended target, again, like another person....

1) ....tell us why you think it would be such a great idea to have even MORE bullets flying around inside a confined space, surrounded by concrete walls with metal lockers on them and steel door frames and various other hard surfaces for these bullets to bounce off of striking God knows what or WHO, and....

2).... who will be held LIABLE when autopsy reports conclude that someone's child or another adult school employee died or was permanently injured by a bullet that was fired, not from the gun of the attacker, but from the gun of a teacher or administrator who was returning fire, and lawsuits start being filed? The teacher/administrator themselves? The county/taxpayers?

Have any of you geniuses ever considered any of those highly likely scenarios?

Or do you think it will be like on TV where the bullets always either hit the bad guy and lodge in his innards or just fly harmlessly off into space where they magically disappear?

Just wondering.

If nothing else, it should be entertaining to see the creative bullshit nonsense replies the barrel strokers come up with.

 

[hvilleherb]

Democrats always look for solutions that cost the taxpayers more money. This one doesn't cost taxpayers a dime. Teachers who want to keep their job take a conceal carry class and buy a gun and ammo and bring their weapon concealed into the classroom each day.

 

[Nomad]

Democrats always look for solutions that cost the taxpayers more money. This one doesn't cost taxpayers a dime. Teachers who want to keep their job take a conceal carry class and buy a gun and ammo and bring their weapon concealed into the classroom each day.

So IOW, you can't answer a single question I asked.

Got it.

Thanks for playing.

 

[CFM]

Given the fact(s) that....

A) ...bullets don't always hit their intended target, or....

B) ...they often times pass through their target (in this case, soft human tissue) barely even slowing down, then strike some non-intended target (like another person) on the other side, and....

C) ....they are known to ricochet around, again, often striking some non-intended target, again, like another person....

1) ....tell us why you think it would be such a great idea to have even MORE bullets flying around inside a confined space, surrounded by concrete walls with metal lockers on them and steel door frames and various other hard surfaces for these bullets to bounce off of striking God knows what or WHO, and....

2).... who will be held LIABLE when autopsy reports conclude that someone's child or another adult school employee died or was permanently injured by a bullet that was fired, not from the gun of the attacker, but from the gun of a teacher or administrator who was returning fire, and lawsuits start being filed? The teacher/administrator themselves? The county/taxpayers?

Have any of you geniuses ever considered any of those highly likely scenarios?

Or do you think it will be like on TV where the bullets always either hit the bad guy and lodge in his innards or just fly harmlessly off into space where they magically disappear?

Just wondering.

If nothing else, it should be entertaining to see the creative bullshit nonsense replies the barrel strokers come up with.

I have an idea. Let's make schools gun free zones so those thinking about doing things like Florida will think twice about it then not do it.

Wait, that has happened. How did it work out?

 

[CFM]

So IOW, you can't answer a single question I asked.

Got it.

Thanks for playing.

Clown questions from someone with so much hate for guns it clouds his NL thoughts.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Too bad I have most of the gunfuckers on ignore; I bet their answers though will just be the same old tired NRA talking points they have printed on little cards that come out after each mass murder event.

 

[hvilleherb]

Too bad I have most of the gunfuckers on ignore; I bet their answers though will just be the same old tired NRA talking points they have printed on little cards that come out after each mass murder event.

So now according to you we're deplorables, rednecks, racists, gunhumpers and gunfuckers.

 

[anatta]

there would have to be liability waivers signed by a school board.

 

[Sirthinksalot]

Too bad I have most of the gunfuckers on ignore

Translation: you're a pathetic cowardly loser who comes on a political forum to spout off garbage and never have your own stupid views challenged. You're one pathetic snowflake!

 

[Teflon Don]

Given the fact(s) that....

A) ...bullets don't always hit their intended target, or....

B) ...they often times pass through their target (in this case, soft human tissue) barely even slowing down, then strike some non-intended target (like another person) on the other side, and....

C) ....they are known to ricochet around, again, often striking some non-intended target, again, like another person....

1) ....tell us why you think it would be such a great idea to have even MORE bullets flying around inside a confined space, surrounded by concrete walls with metal lockers on them and steel door frames and various other hard surfaces for these bullets to bounce off of striking God knows what or WHO, and....

2).... who will be held LIABLE when autopsy reports conclude that someone's child or another adult school employee died or was permanently injured by a bullet that was fired, not from the gun of the attacker, but from the gun of a teacher or administrator who was returning fire, and lawsuits start being filed? The teacher/administrator themselves? The county/taxpayers?

Have any of you geniuses ever considered any of those highly likely scenarios?

Or do you think it will be like on TV where the bullets always either hit the bad guy and lodge in his innards or just fly harmlessly off into space where they magically disappear?

Just wondering.

If nothing else, it should be entertaining to see the creative bullshit nonsense replies the barrel strokers come up with.

You are missing the point of making them gun free zones.

The object isn't to turn schools into shooting galleries. The object is to PREVENT these nut jobs from striking what they perceive to be a soft target.

Ask yourself this question. Why is it that 98% of mass murders since 1950 have occurred in GUN FREE ZONES?

Why did the Aurora shooter pick the one theater within a 20 minute drive of his home that was a GUN FREE ZONE? The other theaters allowed concealed carry on their premises? Do you think it was an accident or a coincidence that of the theaters in his area he picked the GUN FREE ZONE?

Do you think it is a coincidence that Cruz picked a GUN FREE ZONE?

That argument is that if nut jobs know that they will likely be stopped before they can do it, they will think twice about doing it.

Get it?


Good

Now move on. You are being defeated by President Trump, and you don't even realize it. It is fun to watch though

 

[Sirthinksalot]

1) ....tell us why you think it would be such a great idea to have even MORE bullets flying around inside a confined space, surrounded by concrete walls with metal lockers on them and steel door frames and various other hard surfaces for these bullets to bounce off of striking God knows what or WHO, and....

Dear idiot, the main point of having teachers concealed carrying is a deterrent effect so less of the cowardly shooters will choose schools as a target. Currently, schools are very vulnerable. I know it's hard for tiny liberal minds to understand, but there would be less bullets flying. Thanks for playing.

 

[Darth Omar]

Too bad I have most of the gunfuckers on ignore; I bet their answers though will just be the same old tired NRA talking points they have printed on little cards that come out after each mass murder event.

Is there anything more tired than the same old ‘take the guns away’ coming from the left?

 

[signalmankenneth]

 

[domer76]

Democrats always look for solutions that cost the taxpayers more money. This one doesn't cost taxpayers a dime. Teachers who want to keep their job take a conceal carry class and buy a gun and ammo and bring their weapon concealed into the classroom each day.

lol

Stupidest fucking post possible.

If a teacher wants to keep their job has to conceal carry?

Get the fuck off this forum, dumbshit. You’re too fucking stupid to participate.

 

[domer76]

So now according to you we're deplorables, rednecks, racists, gunhumpers and gunfuckers.

That’s a pretty good start.

 

[domer76]

Is there anything more tired than the same old ‘take the guns away’ coming from the left?

Yep. Sure is.

MORE GUNS!
MORE GUNS!
MORE GUNS!

 

[NOVA]

Given the fact(s) that....

A) ...bullets don't always hit their intended target, or....

B) ...they often times pass through their target (in this case, soft human tissue) barely even slowing down, then strike some non-intended target (like another person) on the other side, and....

C) ....they are known to ricochet around, again, often striking some non-intended target, again, like another person....

1) ....tell us why you think it would be such a great idea to have even MORE bullets flying around inside a confined space, surrounded by concrete walls with metal lockers on them and steel door frames and various other hard surfaces for these bullets to bounce off of striking God knows what or WHO, and....

2).... who will be held LIABLE when autopsy reports conclude that someone's child or another adult school employee died or was permanently injured by a bullet that was fired, not from the gun of the attacker, but from the gun of a teacher or administrator who was returning fire, and lawsuits start being filed? The teacher/administrator themselves? The county/taxpayers?

Have any of you geniuses ever considered any of those highly likely scenarios?

Or do you think it will be like on TV where the bullets always either hit the bad guy and lodge in his innards or just fly harmlessly off into space where they magically disappear?

Just wondering.

If nothing else, it should be entertaining to see the creative bullshit nonsense replies the barrel strokers come up with.

So whats your point ?....Just let the kids on their own when something happens?

Seems like that is exactly happened in Parkland....cops hiding behind cars...warnings ignored by the FBI....
If only 5% or 10% of the teachers or other school employees would agree to carrying, that would better than the nothing that law enforcement provided....

Pinheads like you would rather blame the NRA or Trump, those that had literally nothing to do with this tragedy....

Whats obvious in this case is that the FBI has the blood of those kids on their hands, first and foremost...warned 5 different times and had his name and do absolutely nothing.
That is just the hard, undeniable facts of the matter.....

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Given the fact(s) that....

A) ...bullets don't always hit their intended target, or....

B) ...they often times pass through their target (in this case, soft human tissue) barely even slowing down, then strike some non-intended target (like another person) on the other side, and....

C) ....they are known to ricochet around, again, often striking some non-intended target, again, like another person....

1) ....tell us why you think it would be such a great idea to have even MORE bullets flying around inside a confined space, surrounded by concrete walls with metal lockers on them and steel door frames and various other hard surfaces for these bullets to bounce off of striking God knows what or WHO, and....

2).... who will be held LIABLE when autopsy reports conclude that someone's child or another adult school employee died or was permanently injured by a bullet that was fired, not from the gun of the attacker, but from the gun of a teacher or administrator who was returning fire, and lawsuits start being filed? The teacher/administrator themselves? The county/taxpayers?

Have any of you geniuses ever considered any of those highly likely scenarios?

Or do you think it will be like on TV where the bullets always either hit the bad guy and lodge in his innards or just fly harmlessly off into space where they magically disappear?

Just wondering.

If nothing else, it should be entertaining to see the creative bullshit nonsense replies the barrel strokers come up with.

why don't you actually be honest for once and tell us that it's not more guns in schools that you have a problem with, it's who has the more guns. Because i'm betting that if taxes were raised to hire more police to put in schools, you'd say that's a damned fine idea. just so long as it isn't civilians because you don't trust Americans, you trust government

 

[Rune]

Democrats always look for solutions that cost the taxpayers more money. This one doesn't cost taxpayers a dime. Teachers who want to keep their job take a conceal carry class and buy a gun and ammo and bring their weapon concealed into the classroom each day.

Listen you stupid fucktard.
You don't force gun haters to carry guns.
You are literally helping the wrong side with your idiotic statements.

STFU

 

[Nomad]

there would have to be liability waivers signed by a school board.

Who else would have to agree to waive liability? Every parent and every relative of every student and every employee who regularly attends or works on a school campus throughout the district?

What about campus visitors? Would they have to sign a waiver too?

Since it's the school board itself who would be attempting to avoid liability with a waiver, who would the liability fall upon?

Would each individual teacher and/or administrator who took on the responsibility of being a gun toter, have to have each and every student and other employee agree to waive their right to sue for damages too?

So far this has been the closest any Trumptard has come to even attempting to address one of my questions.

The rest of the 'tard posts have been the usual and expected attempts at deflection.

No surprise at all.