There’s still no ‘there’ there in the Russia probe

Well, your 1st mistake is thinking I'm a Democrat, or that I care about defending them.

Investigate them, and if they're guilty, punish them.

You won't hear me saying "so what?" if they are.

If you don’t think democrats need investigated over what’s been revealed lately I’m calling you a democrat defender.
 
If you don’t think democrats need investigated over what’s been revealed lately I’m calling you a democrat defender.

Good for you. Pretty hollow, though, since you've been screaming that the investigation into the Trump campaign is a sham since it started.

But, whatever makes you feel okey-dokey about everything.
 
Maybe Mueller should decide how legal it was lol.
Oh, what was I thinking.
amazing they defend Hillary for hiring Steel's Russians, while at the same time search for Trump's "Russian collusion" Talk about disconnect thoughts! -that takes the cake
 
Both Comey and Mueller are life long Republicans. They are just investigators looking for the truth. The Trump investigations are not Democratic. If you paid any attention to last couple elections, you would know the Repubs are in power of all 3 branches of government. That is why we had 8 Benghazi and a bunch of email commissions. They wasted mega millions of tax dollars for their own political advantage. Hell some even admitted it was about smearing Hillary.. The FBI and the justice dept. are just doing their jobs, looking for wrong doing. With Trump, it is easy.

If Mueller found nothing, he would have wrapped up the investigations and announced it. However 4 Trumpies have been charged , confessed and are testifying to what they did and what they know. There is lots of fire here.
 
amazing they defend Hillary for hiring Steel's Russians, while at the same time search for Trump's "Russian collusion" Talk about disconnect thoughts! -that takes the cake

Keep in mind independent voters don’t suffer from TDS and disconnected thinking lol.
 
Both Comey and Mueller are life long Republicans. They are just investigators looking for the truth. The Trump investigations are not Democratic. If you paid any attention to last couple elections, you would know the Repubs are in power of all 3 branches of government. That is why we had 8 Benghazi and a bunch of email commissions. They wasted mega millions of tax dollars for their own political advantage. Hell some even admitted it was about smearing Hillary.. The FBI and the justice dept. are just doing their jobs, looking for wrong doing. With Trump, it is easy.

If Mueller found nothing, he would have wrapped up the investigations and announced it. However 4 Trumpies have been charged , confessed and are testifying to what they did and what they know. There is lots of fire here.

That’s putting a happy face on it lol.

The person’s charged biggest crimes were lying about something that wasn’t illegal. It’s a shame sheer stupidity isn’t a crime or they could have gotten charged with that. Meanwhile, Hillary gets the legal language changed to keep from being indicted for a serious crime—that, notably, would implicate Obama.

Meanwhile, they have absolutely nothing on Trump. Just a bunch of maybe’s.
 
Both Comey and Mueller are life long Republicans. They are just investigators looking for the truth. The Trump investigations are not Democratic. If you paid any attention to last couple elections, you would know the Repubs are in power of all 3 branches of government. That is why we had 8 Benghazi and a bunch of email commissions. They wasted mega millions of tax dollars for their own political advantage. Hell some even admitted it was about smearing Hillary.. The FBI and the justice dept. are just doing their jobs, looking for wrong doing. With Trump, it is easy.

If Mueller found nothing, he would have wrapped up the investigations and announced it. However 4 Trumpies have been charged , confessed and are testifying to what they did and what they know. There is lots of fire here.
Mueller's party affiliation has little to do with it, it's more about the FBI corruption that launched the investigations ( FISA abuse/etc). The existing charged are "process charges" -meaning there was no evidene of wrongdoing with the Russians. They were charged with lying to the FBI etc,
 
That’s putting a happy face on it lol.

The person’s charged biggest crimes were lying about something that wasn’t illegal. It’s a shame sheer stupidity isn’t a crime or they could have gotten charged with that. Meanwhile, Hillary gets the legal language changed to keep from being indicted for a serious crime—that, notably, would implicate Obama.

Meanwhile, they have absolutely nothing on Trump. Just a bunch of maybe’s.

How do you know they have nothing on Trump?

How in the world would you know that?
 
Mueller's party affiliation has little to do with it, it's more about the FBI corruption that launched the investigations ( FISA abuse/etc). The existing charged are "process charges" -meaning there was no evidene of wrongdoing with the Russians. They were charged with lying to the FBI etc,

That doesn't even make sense. How do you know what the evidence was, or understand the whole impetus for the investigation?
 
I said maybe lol?

You didn't say that they "maybe" had nothing on Trump. You said definitively that they had absolutely nothing on Trump. You said that they just had a bunch of "maybes."

I'll keep saying it as long as you keep asserting stuff like that: investigations aren't open to the public. You have no idea what they have; neither do I.
 
You're basing that entire conclusion on a leak?

Total credibility nosedive. You & Darth are both very partisan, and see things through those goggles.

The whole investigation is partisan.

If they were serious about Russian influence in the election [they’re not, it’s a witch hunt] they should have appointed an SP to investigate BOTH sides.

And that becomes clearer by the day.
 
You didn't say that they "maybe" had nothing on Trump. You said definitively that they had absolutely nothing on Trump. You said that they just had a bunch of "maybes."

I'll keep saying it as long as you keep asserting stuff like that: investigations aren't open to the public. You have no idea what they have; neither do I.

They maybe have something lol.

I just wouldn’t bet money on it. And by ‘something’ I mean something besides a process crime.
 
That doesn't even make sense. How do you know what the evidence was, or understand the whole impetus for the investigation?
get up to speed on the Nunes memo and the Grassley letter.

Nunes does say the Papadapolis bragging in a bar alerted the Australians, who alerted us
( I forget the exact circumstances)- but a bar braaging night of drinking cannot sustain an FBI investigation.

What really got it going was the FISC warrant based on the phony Steele dossier
( paid for by the Clinton campaign ) where Steele was fed dezinformatsiya by his "Kremlin contacts"

The FISA applications neglected to say it was opposition research ( foot noting it only as "political")-
and made heavy reliance on the dossier- despite the fact they knew it was unverified, along with the Isakoff article-
but that too came directly from Steele's media contacts, and the FBI knew it, but still used it as supporting evidence.

Mueller would not be doing his monkey business except for the FBI counter-intelligence investigation he subsumed.
Russian collusion is laughable, and based on sketchy info from Steele who was "desperate" to stop Trump
 
get up to speed on the Nunes memo and the Grassley letter.

Nunes does say the Papadapolis bragging in a bar alerted the Australians, who alerted us
( I forget the exact circumstances)- but a bar braaging night of drinking cannot sustain an FBI investigation.

What really got it going was the FISC warrant based on the phony Steele dossier
( paid for by the Clinton campaign ) where Steele was fed dezinformatsiya by his "Kremlin contacts"

The FISA applications neglected to say it was opposition research ( foot noting it only as "political")-
and made heavy reliance on the dossier- despite the fact they knew it was unverified, along with the Isakoff article-
but that too came directly from Steele's media contacts, and the FBI knew it, but still used it as supporting evidence.

Mueller would not be doing his monkey business except for the FBI counter-intelligence investigation he subsumed.
Russian collusion is laughable, and based on sketchy info from Steele who was "desperate" to stop Trump

You've told him this already, he is just not listening to you!

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
The whole investigation is partisan.

If they were serious about Russian influence in the election [they’re not, it’s a witch hunt] they should have appointed an SP to investigate BOTH sides.

And that becomes clearer by the day.

It's interesting how Democrats didn't have a problem when Obama illegally wiretapped Trump.
 
Back
Top