Trump Administration moves to end legal marijuana.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Canceled.2018.1
Canceled
Who? People who think that individual rights still matter. I don't do drugs, but I will always argue for the legalization of not only medical cannabis, but recreational, noting that with rights come responsibilities. If I had to choose to surround myself with a few hundred potheads or a few hundred drunks, I stay with the calm crowd.
People? You mean dope heads that could give a rats ass about the right to freely speak (example...this thread).....the same people that could care less if the right to bare arms in order to defend one's rights and freedoms is taken away....these people who now rush out to say "WE" when its their dope they are coming after? Really? Again...what makes one right more important than the next and why is it OK to attack certain unalienable rights (non-transferable) but its CRY ME A RIVER TIME
when its something that directly effects the selfish? I am a defender of all rights....as I have said (who cares....its YOUR BRAIN CELLS), but I would not walk across the street to piss on those with TWO FACES if they were on fire from a weed ember.
. There is nothing wrong with weed.....its more or less like alcohol , it does more harm than good to the human body.....ITS YOUR BODY, when you abuse that private sphere that surrounds every free person and enter the threshold of placing MY RIGHT to life and liberty on the line because you are missing a few vital brain cells its a different story. Stay at home...become a burn out, but don't come bitching and pretending to be part of the whole when clearly you could care less about anyone else's personal rights and act like SHEEP to the slaughter when it comes to the rights that effect the security and the pursuit of EVERYONE.
Last edited:
Canceled.2018.1
Canceled
People? You mean dope heads that could give a rats ass about the right to freely speak (example...this thread).....the same people that could care less if the right to bare arms in order to defend one's rights and freedoms is taken away....these people who now rush out to say "WE" when its their dope they are coming after? Really? Again...what makes one right more important than the next and why is it OK to attack certain unalienable rights (non-transferable) but its CRY ME A RIVER TIME
I am a defender of all rights....as I have said (who cares....its YOUR BRAIN CELLS), but I would not walk across the street to piss on those with TWO FACES.
Well, back to prohibition then. Go check out how many brain cells alcohol destroys. No more smoking at all either.
Can't read concerning your false premise? ALL? What's that mean to you? Whoops...its a brain cell thingy...no? Who could give a rats ass about PROHIBITION 100 years after the fact? Again...WE?
Cry me a river. Defend them all or defend none....and simply go tug on your rope and eat your munchies while Rome burns around you. Those two faced individuals? The majority that self identify themselves as "LIBERTARIAN"....but don't see a damn thing wrong with killing unborn children or pissing on religious freedom....a basic form of freedom to speak. To be respected you have to "earn" respect...not demand it, you are either all in or you are part of the problem.Simply because I don't agree with the use of these recreational drugs...does not indicate that I want to remove your personal freedom. I simply can't stand two faced individuals. And its MY RIGHT to address that personal right in public...and no, its not hate speech because I disagree....its opinionated speech, and its just as important as anyone's right to get stoned and abuse that right because they are not capable of articulating a logical stream of thought in order to exercise that right of speech. I.E....BURN OUTS.
Last edited:
cancel2 2022
Canceled
It was due to Prohibition that organised crime became so rampant, so you ought to care about that at least.Can't read concerning your false premise? ALL? What's that me to you? Whoops...its a brain cell thingy...no? Who could give a rats ass about PROHIBITION 100 years after the fact? Again...WE?
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
yet he seems to have nailed you perfectly......
cancel2 2022
Canceled
This article made laugh, commercial cannabis growers know that injecting CO2 into greenhouses increases yields dramatically.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/02/what-cannabis-growers-know-that-climate-scientists-dont-know/
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/02/what-cannabis-growers-know-that-climate-scientists-dont-know/
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
Again...a brain cell thingy....your false comparative premise? Where is the constitutional restriction against weed as was involved with the banning of one specific drug....Alcohol? Where is the constitutional amending rescinding that restriction?
There is quite a bit of difference between Common law and Constitutional Law.....in common law you have the right and tools needed to address your grievance through the process of voting or court ruling, but if something is restricted via Constitutional edict...you are screwed as you must have a 75% SUPER MAJORITY of your fellow citizens to correct or evolve again from a MISTAKE. Luck in getting 75% of your fellow states to give you the right to bitch about your weed while you piss on their rights of self expression and personal protection. Its a STATE RIGHTS THING. Let the war's and grievances begin. Battle it out in the courts and on the streets....just don't look toward me to piss on you when you become engulfed in a fire of your making...due to APATHY toward the rights of everyone.
Again....its an ARTICULATION thing whey you can't defend that which you can't defend.....THE ACT OF WEARING TWO FACES....while that defense never includes the use of the word "WE". Speak for yourself....I will defend your right do as much....but never attempt to speak for ME when you are not capable of stringing more than two words together that relates in any fashion to the cognition of logic and or reason.
And besides...you must face the reality: Just how many violent and dangerous stoners actually exist...that would require the use of any automatic illegal weapons to subdue in order to provide a market? Yeah....but....but....but....but
Reality: All you will ever do is bitch and
Last edited:
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
WRONG
Ron "Paul contended that faith-based groups provide superior social services but warned that “[c]hurches should not become entangled with government subsidies and programs.” Paul also introduced legislation to remove religious freedom-related legal cases from federal court jurisdiction because he viewed such cases as examples of government interfering with religious expression."
http://projects.pewforum.org/rp2012/ron-paul/
Ron " Paul calls himself "strongly pro-life" and "an unshakable foe of abortion".
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Another comprehension problem? A majority does not include a minority. Because one dog bites does not mean that all dogs bite. The majority of those self professing to be "liberaltarian" are nothing but extreme leftists pretending to be something they are not.....constitutionalists, the majority simply like to cherry pick rights that include only their personal preferences. Fascists to the bone....as the right to life surpasses all rights, as one must be alive in order to be either free or happy....be means EXISTS....living, no dead individual in the womb or out can be anything other than DEAD.
What's with you people and your false comparative premises? What? Ron Paul is not part of either the majority or the minority? All means all...anything less accepts the reality of substance where that substance exists. No one said, ALL Liberaltarians.....as calling yourself a liberaltarian is the invogue thing to do today...but calling yourself something and acting in a contrary fashion with the real creature is entirely a different subject....I can call myself an astronaut, but that does not make me an astronaut.
I deal in facts, logic and reason.....as that is where all truth lies for everyone...and its the constant that calibrates as its the same for everyone once an evidential trail has been established...even if its based upon prima facie evidences of truth. Like, "If it looks like a duck....yada...yada...yada...." As that which looks like a duck must be accepted as a true duck...until objective evidence proves its not really a duck but a decoy....like defending anyone's right to kill their children and stating that right to kill is a personal freedom and its constitutional....when IT IS NOT actually in the constitution....as every right must come to an end when DUE PROCESS is extended and exhausted. No unborn child has ever been charged, indicted and convicted for crimes against humanity that requires a death sentence.
Last edited:
You claim to support responsibilities with rights. If one of those potheads from the "calm crowd" gets smoked up, gets in a car, and kills an innocent person do you support the pothead being convicted and going to jail for a long time on the first offense?
What I've noticed in the responsibilities with rights claims is that they focus on the rights and forget about the responsibilities when situations like the one I mention happen. It becomes rights then excuses.
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
Ron Paul is the titular leader of the Libertarian party.
Libertarian is further to the Right than republican
Ron Paul is the titular leader of the Libertarian party.
Libertarian is further to the Right than republican
One more time. Does being a leader indicate that Mr. Paul belongs to neither the majority or the minority within that subculture calling themselves liberaltarians? You mean a TRUE liberaltarian...no? I am sure you simply misspoke..or do you speak for everyone like all the other TWO FACED individuals?
Another FALSE comparative premise. When you can prove that Majority engulfs everything to include the MINORITY....lets compare. What you have just exampled is a tactic common to all liberal/leftists.....the DEFLECTION away from an evidential truth. Why not just say, "I thought I was wrong once....but I was merely MISTAKEN."?Simply because you can point toward a SHOW DOG does not mean that "MUTS" do not exist.
Last edited:
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
One more time. Does being a leader indicate that Mr. Paul belongs to neither the majority or the minority within that subculture calling themselves liberaltarians? You mean a TRUE liberaltarian...no? I am sure you simply misspoke..or do you speak for everyone like all the other TWO FACED individuals?
Simply because you can point toward a SHOW DOG does not mean that "MUTS" do not exist.
I'll take your verbal diarrhea (because that's all it is
) as a concession speech. Thanks!
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
this thread reminds of a case I had a couple of years ago....client hired me to evict a tenant.....the guy was growing marijuana in the basement under lights......apparently the increased humidity had caused mold to grow and the tenant called the city housing inspector to complain that his landlord was permitting mold to grow and did he have to pay rent......so the housing inspector came out to inspect........(and lib'ruls think marijuana doesn't make people stupid)........
