Trump Administration moves to end legal marijuana.

evince said:
that is a lie


the stste all tried to stand up tp Bush when he failed to inforce the banking rules


that revolt was sarted by aa democratic guy named spitzer



the states started making states rules to have their OWN banking laws to protect themselves with



the Bush Admin FORCED THEM TO DROP THEIR IDEAS OF STATE LAWS


and let the banks RAPE everyone

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21707830-How-the-Bush-Administration-Protected-Predatory-Lending
Click to expand...

Can you for once, just for once, stay on the topic, instead if always trying to divert it the direction you want it to go.
<rhetorical question; because you don't have the ability>
 
Bigdog said:

If it goes that way, it should cause enough outrage to get congress to change the law.
Click to expand...

That's what's amazing.
When liberals have the control and the opportunity to make these changes permanent, they don't do it; but when they don't have the control, they complain about the changes not being made permanent.

:facepalm:
 
cawacko said:
For me, I disagree that this is the best way to go about it.

I think it's bad policy and definitely bad politics as many people are looking at the Republican Party as dinosaurs on this issue which we are.
Click to expand...

Then why haven't liberals changed it, themselves?
 
Bigdog said:
The democrats controlled congress from 52 to 94 and never did a damn thing about it. Under Obama they had a huge majority in both houses ... and we got nada.

I think there was one bill in 2010? ... and it got like 10 democrat votes, IIRC.

The right way is rarely the easy way.
:D
Click to expand...

It's because; while they're dumb, they're not stupid.
They don't want to appear to be the ones responsible, if they change this and things go "south" (so to speak).
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
That's what's amazing.
When liberals have the control and the opportunity to make these changes permanent, they don't do it; but when they don't have the control, they complain about the changes not being made permanent.
Click to expand...

:hand: :hand:
 
TTQ64 said:
The 13th Amendment of the Constitution has a clause which states that slavery is illegal, except for criminals.

This loophole is how lazy, greedy, racist, white men are able to continue slavery to this day.

They flooded the populous with the lie that all Black men are criminals.
Click to expand...

Then I would suggest that you don't continue being a criminal. :good4u:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Can you for once, just for once, stay on the topic, instead if always trying to divert it the direction you want it to go.
<rhetorical question; because you don't have the ability>
Click to expand...
It is pretty damned ironic that people like her accuse Trump of having an attention deficit disorder when she is totally unable to stay on topic ever.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Then why haven't liberals changed it, themselves?
Click to expand...

It was changed in as much as Obama said don't pursue it heavily. Now Sessions is reversing that. Weed isn't going to be legalized over night by Congress. But the federal gov't putting less emphasis on prosecuting it was a good thing. With this ruling we're going backwards.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
It's because; while they're dumb, they're not stupid.
They don't want to appear to be the ones responsible, if they change this and things go "south" (so to speak).
Click to expand...

Which is why trying it out at the state level is so important. It will have to show to work in the states first before it ever gets approved nationally. That's why this ruling messing up what the state's are doing is a bad one.
 
TTQ64 said:
Black prisoners exceeds the number of enslaved Blacks in the 1850s, an astonishing revelation that many Americans are largely unaware of.

Sessions wants to keep prison shareholders pockets fat.

If pot is legal, they have to find other ways to enslave Black men.
Click to expand...

Has the population numbers remained the same, as they were in the 1850's, or have they increased?

attachment.php
 
cawacko said:
It was changed in as much as Obama said don't pursue it heavily. Now Sessions is reversing that. Weed isn't going to be legalized over night by Congress. But the federal gov't putting less emphasis on prosecuting it was a good thing. With this ruling we're going backwards.
Click to expand...


BTW, Republican U.S. Senator Cory Gardner is pissed about this and has vehemently voiced his displeasure on the news media.

:D
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Then I would suggest that you don't continue being a criminal. :good4u:
Click to expand...

Another ignorant racist white man. You people can ignore these facts and spew every other excuse in the book. But the bottom line will not change.

Nixon, DEA, big pharma, billions in campaign bribes, private prisons, hits Blacks disproportionaly which racist white men love, kops get to confiscate cash from people then make them prove they obtained it legally, weapon sales to police departments, private prison industry, banks laundering the money. The "drug war" is just big business for the vested interests with the added benefit of locking up people they don't like; i.e. Blacks and those not likely to vote for them.
 
TTQ64 said:
the 13th Amendment freed the enslaved population from the control of slave owners, the reality of slavery lived on. Former slave owners and humiliated Confederate sympathizers sought to maintain the antebellum status quo and minimize the amendment’s financial and social implications. After the war “black codes”—laws aimed at restricting the freedom of former slaves—were initiated to control freed men and women once again. So-called black codes criminalized gathering for worship, reading, writing, and even unemployment. They also supported a system of peonage—the practice of holding persons in servitude as part of a penal sentence. The prison system was used to simultaneously maintain control over the movement of blacks and also to exploit their labor through incarceration. Upon imprisonment, those once enslaved were again forced to work for free—as if slavery had never ended.

The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.
Click to expand...

:popcorn:
 
Superfreak said:
No, I am being factual. Something you seem to lack the ability to do these days. While I disagree with Sessions on this, Jarod was being completely dishonest as to what happened. As were you.
Click to expand...

The liberal argument is like if California decided that bank robbery wasn't illegal, as long as no one was physically injured, then the Feds should also ignore it.
 
Teflon Don said:
More over the top exaggeration

Are you saying states are free to ignore any federal laws they want?

You seem to be solely focused on the fact that you want to get high. Don’t worry Cheech . Nobody is breaking down your door to take your bong, YET
Click to expand...

ftfy :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top