Had Trump lost the election, he'd still be contesting it. It would probably be a national crisis since many of his followers would support that.
In other words what Democrats are doing now. Nice call!
Had Trump lost the election, he'd still be contesting it. It would probably be a national crisis since many of his followers would support that.
In other words what Democrats are doing now. Nice call!
Not really comparable. "The Resistance" is really no different from how the party out of power has been for quite awhile.
I don't see any major movement to actually contest the results of the election.
Not suspicious at all that you would default to calling me a liar;
You just assumed grind was telling the truth because he's fighting with a liberal.
obviously not, given how often you lie....have you found a quote yet of him saying he wouldn't accept the results of the election unless he won?......
I repeat, I assumed grind was telling the truth because not even Cypress denied it was true......are you denying its true?......
#138 dummy. Are you actually reading the comments on this thread?
I don't know.....I know if someone here posted that I had harassed women online I would certainly deny it......I expect most folks would.......why would it feed Grind's obsession if I called him a liar?.......I call you a liar all the time........does that feed your obsession?......That means nothing. Why should he feed grind's obsession?
I just looked at #138...It doesn't say he won't accept the results of the election if he does not win.#138 dummy. Are you actually reading the comments on this thread?
I just looked at #138...It doesn't say he won't accept the results of the election if he does not win.
It says:
"I would like to promise and pledge to all of my voters and supporters and to all of the people of the United States that I will totally accept the results of this great and historic presidential election, if I win"...
You said read #138. I did. It doesn't say what you are claiming he said.Another one who didn't read all of trump's comments about accepting the results.
but #138 says the exact opposite of what you claimed he said.......are you just conceding that you lied?......(you might as well, we all know you did).....
You said read #138. I did. It doesn't say what you are claiming he said.
He did not say what you claimed he said.He will accept the results "if I win." He didn't say he would accept the results, period. In fact, his position was:
Donald Trump has, in recent days, blasted the presidential campaign as "rigged," and at Wednesday's debate in Las Vegas, he was asked whether he would accept the election results, no matter the outcome. He refused to make that commitment, saying he would "look at it at the time." When pressed again by moderator Chris Wallace, the GOP nominee said: “I will tell you at the time. I will keep you in suspense.”
He did not say what you claimed he said.
Another one who didn't read all of trump's comments about accepting the results.
Had Trump lost the election, he'd still be contesting it. It would probably be a national crisis since many of his followers would support that.
It is common knowledge that Trump was suggesting he wouldn't accept the results of the election, if he lost.
Not even debatable.
So you didn't check for yourself. You just assumed grind was telling the truth because he's fighting with a liberal. How unsurprising.