TOP
Retired Teacher
So, there's nothing that supports that fact that the dogs were trained to fight. That's what I thought.Read the damned article, IDIOT!!!!
It's linked right in the OP!!!!
Geez!!!!![]()
So, there's nothing that supports that fact that the dogs were trained to fight. That's what I thought.Read the damned article, IDIOT!!!!
It's linked right in the OP!!!!
Geez!!!!![]()
You don't have to agree and you don't have to own one. Have you ever had any personal experience with that type of dog? They are not dangerous unless they are trained to be that way, neglected, or abused. But, that's any dog. You realize that, don't you?Sorry don't agree, they are too dangerous.
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
So, there's nothing that supports that fact that the dogs were trained to fight. That's what I thought.
You don't have to agree and you don't have to own one. Have you ever had any personal experience with that type of dog? They are not dangerous unless they are trained to be that way, neglected, or abused. But, that's any dog. You realize that, don't you?
Because it would be unusual for the dogs to attack their owner, their caretaker, one who had raised them from puppies.So now tell us why you think these two mauled their owner to death.
There are many questions coming from experts about this case. "Dogs don't typically just out the blue attack their owners, so there is typically some kind of provocation. Was there someone else there? Were they being attacked by somebody, were they trying to defend themselves and their own from somebody else, or from a wild animal?"
Dr. Amy Learn, vet at Cary St Veterinary Hospital
I do hope they do an investigation...while anything is possible, this situation is highly suspect.
Because it would be unusual for the dogs to attack their owner, their caretaker, one who had raised them from puppies.
Very very unusual.
Do you have any experience with pit bulls, or dogs?
Why would I need to make that up?Yet, you provide no link to any story about these supposed questions and we're just supposed to take your "word" for it, right?
Sure.
We don't know exactly what the dogs did or why. There is no evidence that the dogs were trained to be aggressive, or neglected or abused.You didn't answer my question.
Why do you think the dogs did what they did?
First you say you don't believe she trained them to be violent or neglected/abused them.
Then you say they don't behave that way unless they were trained to be violent or neglected/abused.
So, which is it?
What, if anything, do you believe?
I have to leave for a bit, but I'll be glad to continue the discussion later today, if you like. In the meantime, look up some info on Pits (that is a type of dog, not a breed, btw).
The ppl who think pitbulls are great animal companions are fucked up. The ppl who think that pitbulls are totally awesome animal companions and just like having a huge bunch of guns so you can walk around saying FUCK YOU to people with impunity are even more fucked up.
Poor woman. And poor dumb animals who were probably (hopefully) euthanized.
Sorry don't agree, they are too dangerous.
Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
We don't know exactly what the dogs did or why. There is no evidence that the dogs were trained to be aggressive, or neglected or abused.
That's why the situation is in question.
I do not believe the dogs attacked her without provocation. That's why I hope they do an investigation. To find out what really happened.
Do you have any experience working with dogs? Pits or any dogs?
Why would you think they just attacked the person who loved and raised them? That makes no sense. At all.