The need to reconsider the Electoral College (and it has nothing to do with Trump)

Did anyone recommend getting rid of State Governments? Point being down the road the President, one third of the Government, could actually be elected continuously by less and less American voters

Sorry, but that is not what the Founding Fathers had in mind

the electoral college was created by the founding fathers. how the fuck do you come to the moronic conclusion that that is NOT what they had in mind?
 
How is one entity in the election having more of a say than all the rest "more representative government?" How is one Americans' vote weighing more than another American's vote "a fair say?"

And it is not mob rule, majority of nations in the Europe have Parliamentary Governments and I wouldn't say they are controlled by the mob

how does one americans vote have more weight than another right now?
 
The EC ensure racist whites have a say in picking a President.


Any other reason the nut jobs give for keeping it is complete and utter BS.

1 person 1 vote. It's how things should be.

Racist whites know they will never win without the EC.
 
"And that is why the separation of powers is important. Doing away with the electoral college would essentially do away with that separation." T #40
- piffle -

There are 3 co-equal branches of U.S. federal government now.
There would continue to be 3 co-equal branches of U.S. federal government if the electoral college were completely, permanently terminated. One has no bearing on the other.
 
70% of Americans are expected to live in the 15 largest states.?

So 15 states rule the entire country ?..it ain't gonna happen....ever.....why is the left so utterly stupid.
 
"Yes it is" TD #44
"Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt, that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."
U.S. President Bush (the younger) lying his @$$ off on televised address to the U.S. March 17th, 2003
Thousands of innocent Americans died as a result of these executive branch lies.
Deaths that almost certainly would not have taken place, if the winner of the vote not been thwarted from taking the office by a premature SCOTUS ruling that discharged the will of the Republican majority on the court.
"No we are not" TD
Correct.
 
I wish people would give up talking about this. It's not going to change, and it's an issue that pisses people off with a passion, for nothing. Anyone want to see the rant I originally was posting, before I got my pain levels, and frustration under control? I doubt it.

One vote, one voice, all the way. The whole reason for a vote is to decide the majority. No one should have any kiddie points, because they feel outnumbered.
 
"I wish people would give up talking about this. It's not going to change, and it's an issue that pisses people off with a passion, for nothing." JD #49
Yes, I think the same thing was said about slavery.
In any case you've articulated the status quo side of the argument quite lucidly here.
"One vote, one voice, all the way. The whole reason for a vote is to decide the majority. No one should have any kiddie points, because they feel outnumbered." JD
And now you've expressed the opposing view, also quite persuasively.
 
Ah, no, never said anything about abolishing State Governments, States, nor even the Electoral College, all that was stated was the Electoral College needs to be reexamined to reflect the changing population trends down the road

Yet you referred to "No8".

This is #8:

nothing more than a liberal attempt to negate and eliminate 50 separate entities known as the United States, preferring instead to have one gigantic entity known as the UA, all dominated by a central government and what they say, goes.
 
"Yes it is" TD #44

Thousands of innocent Americans died as a result of these executive branch lies.
Deaths that almost certainly would not have taken place, if the winner of the vote not been thwarted from taking the office by a premature SCOTUS ruling that discharged the will of the Republican majority on the court.

Correct.

77% of the Congressional Senate voted to pass the Iraq war resolution......to go to war with Iraq......

Vietnam War was ordered by the Kennedy and Johnson (not voted on by Congress) where 10's of thousands of innocent Americans died, on a lie about being attacked in Gulf of Tonkin...
 
"Demographic trends also are straining the American model. Because of the way the Electoral College works, two of the past three presidents first won office while losing the popular vote. And David Birdsell, dean of the school of public and international affairs at Baruch College, notes that by 2040, about 70% of Americans are expected to live in the 15 largest states. They will have only 30 senators representing them, while the remaining 30% of Americans will have 70 senators representing them."

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-variedand-globalthreats-confronting-democracy-1511193763

Currently, the State of Wyoming has more say in electing a President then the Buffalo, New York metro area which is twice the size of Wyoming in population

Down the road it appears we will not be the representative democracy that the Founding Fathers has imagined

Absolutely the obsolete and out-dated Electoral College must be addressed ..as well as putting in place checks and balances that will prevent a moron unfit for office from ever being given the nuclear codes ever again.

If that requires a constitutional amendment, so be it as the constitution itself should be updated.
 
"77% of the Congressional Senate voted to pass the Iraq war resolution......to go to war with Iraq......" N #53
Yes, including Senator Clinton (D-NY).
They were deliberately disinformed, lied to.
"Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt, that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."
U.S. President Bush (the younger) televised address to the U.S. March 17th, 2003
There's no way that could not have been a LIE.
"Vietnam War was ordered by the Kennedy and Johnson (not voted on by Congress) where 10's of thousands of innocent Americans died, on a lie about being attacked in Gulf of Tonkin..." N
Not only that. We never should have signed that treaty in the first place. But I agree. The Gulf of Tonkin resolution didn't make it any better.

In any case "two wrongs don't make a right". The U.S. fights too many wars. It's long past time to dial that back. I'd like to personally thank President Obama for insisting that the boots on the ground to defeat ISIL be occupied by non-American feet.
 
Yes, including Senator Clinton (D-NY).
They were deliberately disinformed, lied to.

There's no way that could not have been a LIE.

Not only that. We never should have signed that treaty in the first place. But I agree. The Gulf of Tonkin resolution didn't make it any better.

In any case "two wrongs don't make a right". The U.S. fights too many wars. It's long past time to dial that back. I'd like to personally thank President Obama for insisting that the boots on the ground to defeat ISIL be occupied by non-American feet.

First off let me say that I never thought that we should have gone into Iraq. But I also do not believe we were lied to. Every intelligence agency in the world believed that Iraq had restarted it's various weapons programs. They believed that because Saddam wanted them to believe it. He wanted his neighbors to fear that he might have them and would be willing to use them.

Second. While we waited for the order to go into Iraq I sat on the border and watched convoy after convoy go into Syria.

Anyone remember the talking heads who spoke about the possible mobile biological production trucks we found? But those same talking heads had an expert say they couldn't have been used for biological production because of the absence of an autoclave. Know what an autoclave does? It sterlizes equipment after use. It's essentially a high tech pressure cooker. If you aren't worried about secondary contamination after production you don't need an autoclave.

Fourth. Since we stepped foot into Iraq to present we have found in excess of a thousand chemical weapons. Many were left over from the Gulf War. Remember the ones he said he destroyed but couldn't prove were destroyed. And others had been produced at various times after the Gulf War.

Lastly. During our time there more than 4 million government documents were found. Many of which showed they did pay various groups who had proven they killed westerners. The program that was decoding and documenting those findings was defunded after Obama entered office when there were still around a million and a half documents left to decipher.


But still. Even given all this I don't think we should have gone into Iraq. That does not mean we were lied to.
 
Last edited:
"But I also do not believe we were lied to."
"That does not mean we were lied to." T #56
I'll quote the lie, and then parse it for you.
"Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt, that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."
U.S. President Bush (the younger) televised address to the U.S. March 17th, 2003
How can a falsehood be a certitude?
It's a lie. There is no other rational explanation.
"Every intelligence agency in the world believed that Iraq had restarted it's various weapons programs. They believed that because Saddam wanted them to believe it. He wanted his neighbors to fear that ..." T
So what?
The "U.N." had been conducting "weapons inspections", basically search & destroy missions for years.
"They" (we) had been over Iraq with a fine-toothed comb. We knew what Saddam had, and what he didn't have.

The Bushies lied.

And the evidence was plain to see.
When JFK publicized the Cuban Missile Crisis, JFK displayed U2 aerial photographs, PHOTOGRAPHS of Russian missiles on Cuban soil.
So what evidence did Secretary Powell present to the U.N. General Assembly?
U.S. government drawings. ARTWORK! Of ostensible mobile WMD labs. WHAT A SHAM! It was all a fraud.
 
I'll quote the lie, and then parse it for you.

How can a falsehood be a certitude?
It's a lie. There is no other rational explanation.

So what?
The "U.N." had been conducting "weapons inspections", basically search & destroy missions for years.
"They" (we) had been over Iraq with a fine-toothed comb. We knew what Saddam had, and what he didn't have.

The Bushies lied.

And the evidence was plain to see.
When JFK publicized the Cuban Missile Crisis, JFK displayed U2 aerial photographs, PHOTOGRAPHS of Russian missiles on Cuban soil.
So what evidence did Secretary Powell present to the U.N. General Assembly?
U.S. government drawings. ARTWORK! Of ostensible mobile WMD labs. WHAT A SHAM! It was all a fraud.



I wasn't a big fan of Bush. But I call a spade a spade.

I like how you only took snippets of my post. It shows your true intent.
 
"I wasn't a big fan of Bush." T #58
Me too, though GHWB was the best comedian. His broccoli speech was worthy of prime-time.

While I don't much care for the other two, I admire and appreciate the integrity of the eldest Bush, now reportedly the longest lived of any U.S. president.
I liked JEB! from the start, without having a rational justification for it. I just liked him, though never voted for him.
"But I call a spade a spade." T #58
Ah, something else we have in common.
"I like how you only took snippets of my post. It shows your true intent." T #58
100% correct!
"Precision & clarity in the use of language leads to precision & clarity of thought." G. Gordon Liddy
Mine is a skill only the very best of communicators have mastered.

It is the intrinsic structure of clear, concise, unambiguous communication. Thank you for noticing.
 
I'll quote the lie, and then parse it for you.

How can a falsehood be a certitude?
It's a lie. There is no other rational explanation.

So what?
The "U.N." had been conducting "weapons inspections", basically search & destroy missions for years.
"They" (we) had been over Iraq with a fine-toothed comb. We knew what Saddam had, and what he didn't have.

The Bushies lied.

And the evidence was plain to see.
When JFK publicized the Cuban Missile Crisis, JFK displayed U2 aerial photographs, PHOTOGRAPHS of Russian missiles on Cuban soil.
So what evidence did Secretary Powell present to the U.N. General Assembly?
U.S. government drawings. ARTWORK! Of ostensible mobile WMD labs. WHAT A SHAM! It was all a fraud.

I'll take Thumper's word on this. He was there, as were a few I've spoken to who were also there. Were you there?
 
Back
Top