Mueller aide fired for anti-Trump texts faces review for role in Clinton email probe

dukkha

Verified User
Two senior Justice Department officials have confirmed to Fox News that the department's Office of Inspector General is reviewing the role played in the Hillary Clinton email investigation by Peter Strzok, a former deputy director for counterintelligence at the FBI who was removed from the staff of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III earlier this year, after Mueller learned that Strzok had exchanged anti-Trump texts with a colleague.

A source close to the matter said the OIG probe, which will examine Strzok's roles in a number of other politically sensitive cases, should be completed by "very early next year."

The task will be exceedingly complex, given Strzok's consequential portfolio.
He participated in the FBI's fateful interview with Hillary Clinton on July 2, 2016 – just days before then-FBI Director James Comey announced he was declining to recommend prosecution of Mrs. Clinton in connection with her use, as secretary of state, of a private email server.

As deputy FBI director for counterintelligence, Strzok also enjoyed liaison with various agencies in the intelligence community, including the CIA, then led by Director John Brennan.

Key figure

House investigators told Fox News they have long regarded Strzok as a key figure in the chain of events when the bureau, in 2016, received the infamous anti-Trump "dossier" and launched a counterintelligence investigation into Russian meddling in the election that ultimately came to encompass FISA surveillance of a Trump campaign associate.

The "dossier" was a compendium of salacious and largely unverified allegations about then-candidate Trump and others around him that was compiled by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS. The firm's bank records, obtained by House investigators, revealed that the project was funded by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., has sought documents and witnesses from the Department of Justice and FBI to determine what role, if any, the dossier played in the move to place a Trump campaign associate under foreign surveillance.

Strzok himself briefed the committee on Dec. 5, 2016, the sources said, but within months of that session House Intelligence Committee investigators were contacted by an informant suggesting that there was “documentary evidence” that Strzok was purportedly obstructing the House probe into the dossier.

In early October, Nunes personally asked Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein – who has overseen the Trump-Russia probe since the recusal of Attorney General Jeff Sessions – to make Strzok available to the committee for questioning, sources said.

While Strzok’s removal from the Mueller team had been publicly reported in August, the Justice Department never disclosed the anti-Trump texts to the House investigators. The denial of access to Strzok was instead predicated, sources said, on broad "personnel" grounds.

When a month had elapsed, House investigators – having issued three subpoenas for various witnesses and documents – formally recommended to Nunes that DOJ and FBI be held in contempt of Congress. Nunes continued pressing DOJ, including a conversation with Rosenstein as recently as last Wednesday.

That turned out to be 12 days after DOJ and FBI had made Strzok available to the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is conducting its own parallel investigation into the allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.

Contempt citations?

Responding to the revelations about Strzok’s texts on Saturday, Nunes said he has now directed his staff to draft contempt-of-Congress citations against Rosenstein and the new FBI director, Christopher Wray.
Unless DOJ and FBI comply with all of his outstanding requests for documents and witnesses by the close of business on Monday, Nunes said, he would seek a resolution on the contempt citations before year’s end.

“We now know why Strzok was dismissed, why the FBI and DOJ refused to provide us this explanation, and at least one reason why they previously refused to make [FBI] Deputy Director [Andrew] McCabe available to the Committee for an interview,”
Nunes said in a statement.
 
Early Saturday afternoon, after Strzok’s texts were cited in published reports by the New York Times and the Washington Post – and Fox News had followed up with inquiries about the department’s refusal to make Strzok available to House investigators – the Justice Department contacted the office of House Speaker Paul Ryan to establish a date for Strzok’s appearance before House Intelligence Committee staff, along with two other witnesses long sought by the Nunes team.

Those witnesses are FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and the FBI officer said to have handled Christopher Steele, the British spy who used Russian sources to compile the dossier for Fusion GPS. The official said to be Steele’s FBI handler has also appeared already before the Senate panel.

The Justice Department maintained that the decision to clear Strzok for House interrogation had occurred a few hours prior to the appearance of the Times and Post stories.

In addition, Rosenstein is set to testify before the House Judiciary Committee on Dec. 13.

The Justice Department maintains that it has been very responsive to the House intel panel's demands, including private briefings for panel staff by senior DOJ and FBI personnel and the production of several hundred pages of classified materials available in a secure reading room at DOJ headquarters on Oct. 31.

Behind the scenes

Sources said Speaker Ryan has worked quietly behind the scenes to try to resolve the clash over dossier-related evidence and witnesses between the House intel panel on the one hand and DOJ and FBI on the other. In October, however, the speaker took the unusual step of saying publicly that the two agencies were "stonewalling" Congress.

All parties agree that some records being sought by the Nunes team belong to categories of documents that have historically never been shared with the committees that conduct oversight of the intelligence community.

Federal officials told Fox News the requested records include “highly sensitive raw intelligence,” so sensitive that officials from foreign governments have emphasized to the U.S. the “potential danger and chilling effect” it could place on foreign intelligence sources.

Justice Department officials noted that Nunes did not appear for a document-review session that his committee’s ranking Democrat, U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., attended, and once rejected a briefing by an FBI official if the panel’s Democratic members were permitted to attend.

Sources close to the various investigations agreed the discovery of Strzok’s texts raised important questions about his work on the Clinton email case, the Trump-Russia probe, and the dossier matter.

“That’s why the IG is looking into all of those things,” a Justice Department official told Fox News on Saturday.

A top House investigator asked: “If Mueller knew about the texts, what did he know about the dossier?”

Peter Carr, a spokesman for the special counsel, said: “Immediately upon learning of the allegations, the Special Counsel’s Office removed Peter Strzok from the investigation.”

Carr declined to comment on the extent to which Mueller has examined the dossier and its relationship, if any, to the counterintelligence investigation that Strzok launched during the height of the campaign season.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...mbers-role-in-clinton-probe-under-review.html
 
more Deep State shenanigans

an informant suggesting that there was “documentary evidence” that Strzok was purportedly obstructing the House probe into the dossier.

this dude was way pro-Hillary -he was fired for his blatant texts.
But he was an integral part of the Clinton Email investigation too- as well as an impetus for the FBI funding the Steele Dossier,and using it as a basis for the Russiaphobic Trump investigation.

The entire FBI leadership should go..they are biased -including Comey. Rosenstein ( Deputy AG) needs to go too

YOU'RE FIRED!
 
While Strzok’s removal from the Mueller team had been publicly reported in August, the Justice Department never disclosed the anti-Trump texts to the House investigators. The denial of access to Strzok was instead predicated, sources said, on broad "personnel" grounds..

as they say, its not the crime, but the cover up.....
 
more Deep State shenanigans

this dude was way pro-Hillary -he was fired for his blatant texts.
But he was an integral part of the Clinton Email investigation too- as well as an impetus for the FBI funding the Steele Dossier,and using it as a basis for the Russiaphobic Trump investigation.

The entire FBI leadership should go..they are biased -including Comey. Rosenstein ( Deputy AG) needs to go too

YOU'RE FIRED!

Only in a more perfect union lol. It’s within Trump’s power to fire them but he’s boxed in politically—-because Russia.

This story dovetails with the FBI being miffed over the whistleblower that reported the tarmac meeting because it’s shows the extent the FBI has been politicized and/or infested with political hacks.

We have someone within the FBI obstructing a congressional investigation into the Dossier? Ok, fine. Let’s beat the Deep State at their own game and appoint an SP to look into the Dossier.
 
more Deep State shenanigans




this dude was way pro-Hillary -he was fired for his blatant texts.
But he was an integral part of the Clinton Email investigation too- as well as an impetus for the FBI funding the Steele Dossier,and using it as a basis for the Russiaphobic Trump investigation.

The entire FBI leadership should go..they are biased -including Comey. Rosenstein ( Deputy AG) needs to go too

YOU'RE FIRED!


Have you noticed that whenever incriminating evidence is revealed against the Trump crime family, you immediately turn the conversation to Hillary Clinton? When will you ever man up and admit that a disaster is in the making all because of Russia, and this President is well on his way out of office.
 
Have you noticed that whenever incriminating evidence is revealed against the Trump crime family, you immediately turn the conversation to Hillary Clinton? When will you ever man up and admit that a disaster is in the making all because of Russia, and this President is well on his way out of office.

What incriminating evidence is that lol?

We certainly have good evidence of obstruction on the part of the FBI. In fact, I just read where Devin Nunes is preparing to write up FBI director Wray AND AG Rod Rosenstein for contempt of Congress.

If Rosenstein gets charged with contempt, that’s grounds for dismissal. And since the AG oversees Mueller—this could get real interesting real quick. I would suggest the FBI and Rosenstein comply with congress and hand over all documents pertaining to the Steele Dossier.

What do you suppose they are hiding, anyway?
 
Only in a more perfect union lol. It’s within Trump’s power to fire them but he’s boxed in politically—-because Russia.

This story dovetails with the FBI being miffed over the whistleblower that reported the tarmac meeting because it’s shows the extent the FBI has been politicized and/or infested with political hacks.

We have someone within the FBI obstructing a congressional investigation into the Dossier? Ok, fine. Let’s beat the Deep State at their own game and appoint an SP to look into the Dossier.
you gotta love Nunes.
Remember all the flak he took for "running to the WH and showing the evidence" on the Steele dossier?

He's like the one person in Congress determined to dig down to the truth.

Now I think the Senate Committee will actually look at the Steele Dossier's impetus on all this Fake Crap Russiagate.

The problem is the Deep State ( and all that implies about abuses and politicization).
It's cost Trump almost a year of his presidency. how much more could have been done !

If Mueller goes for Obstruction -remember how Trump must have felt being on the receiving end of all these Shenanigans.
It's no wonder he was looking to find an honest man in Comey when he asked about loyalty,and if he was a target
 
Only in a more perfect union lol. It’s within Trump’s power to fire them but he’s boxed in politically—-because Russia.

This story dovetails with the FBI being miffed over the whistleblower that reported the tarmac meeting because it’s shows the extent the FBI has been politicized and/or infested with political hacks.

We have someone within the FBI obstructing a congressional investigation into the Dossier? Ok, fine. Let’s beat the Deep State at their own game and appoint an SP to look into the Dossier.
Ask the delusional fool for proof that the FBI funded Steele.
 
What incriminating evidence is that lol?

We certainly have good evidence of obstruction on the part of the FBI. In fact, I just read where Devin Nunes is preparing to write up FBI director Wray AND AG Rod Rosenstein for contempt of Congress.

If Rosenstein gets charged with contempt, that’s grounds for dismissal. And since the AG oversees Mueller—this could get real interesting real quick. I would suggest the FBI and Rosenstein comply with congress and hand over all documents pertaining to the Steele Dossier.

What do you suppose they are hiding, anyway?

Is there any lie that you not use to attempt to stop the criminal investigation of this administration? Never use the name Devin Nunes in conjunction with truth or facts.
 
Have you noticed that whenever incriminating evidence is revealed against the Trump crime family, you immediately turn the conversation to Hillary Clinton? When will you ever man up and admit that a disaster is in the making all because of Russia, and this President is well on his way out of office.
Yea. And he spices it up with the foil hat club rhetoric
 
What incriminating evidence is that lol?

We certainly have good evidence of obstruction on the part of the FBI. In fact, I just read where Devin Nunes is preparing to write up FBI director Wray AND AG Rod Rosenstein for contempt of Congress.

If Rosenstein gets charged with contempt, that’s grounds for dismissal. And since the AG oversees Mueller—this could get real interesting real quick. I would suggest the FBI and Rosenstein comply with congress and hand over all documents pertaining to the Steele Dossier.

What do you suppose they are hiding, anyway?
damn straight. enough of these farcical shenanigans.

If I were Trump damn if i wouldn't clean house of all these Obama leftovers.

Look at what Clapper did. It's one reason State was cleaned out by Tillerson too.

"YOU'RE FIRED"
 
Last edited:
Yea. And he spices it up with the foil hat club rhetoric
oh look who dropped by once again with nothing to say about the corruption of the Deep State.

The damn guy was fired for politicization- hip Deep in #NeverTrump land..nothing to see here..
 
Is there any lie that you not use to attempt to stop the criminal investigation of this administration? Never use the name Devin Nunes in conjunction with truth or facts.

The fact is the FBI and Trump’s own AG are stonewalling congress. It’s a fact.

Why would they stonewall? Stonewalling, to such an extent they risk being held in contempt of Congress.

What are they hiding?
 
Ask the delusional fool for proof that the FBI funded Steele.
It's what is being looked at, but not just the funding - most importantly where the Steele Dossier led for the counterintelligence investigation

- but you knew that (not)
 
oh look who dropped by once again with nothing to say about the corruption of the Deep State.

The damn guy was fired for politicization- hip Deep in #NeverTrump land..nothing to see here..

You really are getting boring honey pot, its only corrupt when investigating Trump, never if the investigation centered around a Democrat.
 
oh look who dropped by once again with nothing to say about the corruption of the Deep State.

The damn guy was fired for politicization- hip Deep in #NeverTrump land..nothing to see here..

And he’s not a random agent assigned to the drug task force or whatever. He was assigned to work with the Mueller investigation. A political hack, feeding Mueller who knows what.
 
You really are getting boring honey pot, its only corrupt when investigating Trump, never if the investigation centered around a Democrat.
my bad for not thread banning your worthless ass.
even your blandishments are boringly off topic
 
And he’s not a random agent assigned to the drug task force or whatever. He was assigned to work with the Mueller investigation. A political hack, feeding Mueller who knows what.
he was in the middle of EVERYTHING!
He was the guy who interviewed Hillary and took no notes?
AND allowed her minions to be interviewed while simultaneously giving immunity AND letting them act as lawyers??

I mean this is rotten to the core stuff corruption
 
Back
Top