Русский агент
Путин - мl
With your attitude and intellect, you'll never have to worry about being assaulted by ANY man.
Not to mention her looks.

BTW, she has boasted about assaulting men on this forum.
Fact.
With your attitude and intellect, you'll never have to worry about being assaulted by ANY man.

Not to mention her looks.
BTW, she has boasted about assaulting men on this forum.
Fact.
I can tell I’ve made my point when the personal attacks start flying.
I can't comment on her looks (never seen a pic), but one can assume she doesn't look human!!
the difference is, the guys getting fired actually did it......
Name these alleged "supporters" who are allegedly "morally outraged", Brad.
Isn't it true that you have stated that you find nothing wrong with having sex with women in your own workplace?
If its consensual, I have no problem with it... Do you know what a huge percentage of married couples met at their workplace?
Do you know that there is a difference between "Sex" and "Sexual Assault"?
Men all over the country are being fired for doing things that Donald Rump bragged about, on tape, before he was elected president.
Now some Rump supporters are morally outraged by Lauer and Franken.

So in your mind, an accusation equates to being automatically guilty; because no woman has ever made a false allegation.
![]()
Dont equate what Moore is accused of... Pedophilia with what these other men are accused of, not even in the same ballpark.

Proof is not something that's necessary in his case.
The only thing that matters in Moore's case is what the voters believe.
AND THERE IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF LIBERAL LOGIC.![]()
What do you mean by "accused"; because you've already said they did it.
![]()
So in your mind, an accusation equates to being automatically guilty; because no woman has ever made a false allegation.
![]()
The evidence against Rump is stronger than say the evidence that Clinton raped Juanita Broderick, yet you believe her.. right?
The difference can be nothing more than the one claiming assault getting pissed at the person with whom they had consensual sex at the time it took place.
Just shows how open we really are and how sad it makes you.
Proof is necessary in any case. It may be in a legal proceeding or the court of public opinion. Anyone that would support allegations without proof in Moore's case is as big of a dumbass as you.
I've proven you're a coward. You've supported it with your excuses.
It goes back to what I've said about Liberals. It's not the proof that matters but how bad you can make it sound.
The evidence against Rump is stronger than say the evidence that Clinton raped Juanita Broderick, yet you believe her.. right?