Greenhouse gasses the ONLY cause of unprecedented global warming

I haven't chatted w/ them.

I wouldn't buy beach property now, though. Do you go to the beach? Every beach I've been too over the past 20 years or so has receded significantly.

Receded? Define.

You mean lost sand beach, right? We are adding sand just did a 15 million job with the army corps in Holden Beach. Google it. They have to do this up and down the oceanfronts in NC
 
We have to take 1 trillion tons of carbon dioxide out of the air. Republicans PLEASE STFU! Quit passing your gas!
 
That was just a lame, partisan speculation on your part.

You have zero proof of that, and it's not even really credible. Regardless, you're woefully informed on this topic, just like Libya & Congressional investigations.

You bring that up every time you get in a hole, Thing lol.

Which is often. Following the money isn’t credible?
 
You bring that up every time you get in a hole, Thing lol.

Which is often. Following the money isn’t credible?

"Get in a hole?"

You just throw out something completely unsubstantiated - completely - like "well, there wasn't enough money or agenda to push global cooling," and I'm getting in a hole?

Yeah - real solid ground you're on there, Darthy. You can pick any topic you want and make up anything you want & say the same thing. You can never be wrong w/ that approach - congrats.
 
With the planet the warmest it's been in the history of modern civilization, the federal government said Friday that "it's extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century."

The contents of the report contradict claims by President Trump and his administration that continually downplay human contribution to climate change and question the ability of scientists to predict its effects.

"For the warming over the last century, there is no convincing alternative explanation supported by the extent of the observational evidence,” the report concluded.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ive-federal-government-report-says/829783001/

Shape Shifter is not allowed to post in this thread

Nice attempt at spreading the word and pushing forward with an important cause, but let's face it, talking to these r/w idiots about this subject is less productive than talking to your mailbox or a tree.

Not even worth the effort.
 
"Get in a hole?"

You just throw out something completely unsubstantiated - completely - like "well, there wasn't enough money or agenda to push global cooling," and I'm getting in a hole?

Yeah - real solid ground you're on there, Darthy. You can pick any topic you want and make up anything you want & say the same thing. You can never be wrong w/ that approach - congrats.

You don’t think there’s money in AGW?

You really think that? That’s naive even by your standards.
 
You don’t think there’s money in AGW?

You really think that? That’s naive even by your standards.

And where did I say the bolded?

So, your logic is that there is money in AGW, therefore the idea of global warming itself (separate of AGW) is made up, therefore any other topic that doesn't make headlines is obscure because there is no money driving it.

You dug your own hole by bringing "global cooling" into this thread. There was never a comparison in terms of study & research. Stop digging further. Or don't - this is kind of fun.
 
And where did I say the bolded?

So, your logic is that there is money in AGW, therefore the idea of global warming itself (separate of AGW) is made up, therefore any other topic that doesn't make headlines is obscure because there is no money driving it.

You dug your own hole by bringing "global cooling" into this thread. There was never a comparison in terms of study & research. Stop digging further. Or don't - this is kind of fun.

You claimed I had no credibility in bringing money into it, then you backed away from it lol.

Which means you just lost the argument because my initial contention was that since there was no money in global cooling, that explains why it didn’t take off and AGW, did.

Next.
 
You claimed I had no credibility in bringing money into it, then you backed away from it lol.

Which means you just lost the argument because my initial contention was that since there was no money in global cooling, that explains why it didn’t take off and AGW, did.

Next.


No, Darth - you have no credibility because it is 100%, pure speculation on your part. If there was any sort of trail or evidence, you might have some - but there isn't. And no, it's not evidence to say there is money behind AGW. Like I said -you can then extend that logic to anything.

I'm not even sure what you're trying to argue anymore. I don't think you are either. Do you not think the globe is warming at all, separate of the idea that man may or may not be impacting it?

Please say yes.
 
Last edited:
You are an extremely stupid poster.

No, Darth - you have no credibility because it is 100%, pure speculation on your part. If there was any sort of trail or evidence, you might have some - but there isn't. And no, it's not evidence to say there is money behind AGW. Like I said -you can then extend that logic to anything.

I'm not even sure what you're trying to argue anymore. I don't think you are either. Do you not think the globe is warming at all, separate of the idea that man may or may not be impacting it?

Please say yes.

How do I answer without speculating lol?
 
Nice attempt at spreading the word and pushing forward with an important cause, but let's face it, talking to these r/w idiots about this subject is less productive than talking to your mailbox or a tree.

Not even worth the effort.

Wilfully dumb and disobedient/
 
We have to take 1 trillion tons of carbon dioxide out of the air. Republicans PLEASE STFU! Quit passing your gas!

What are you personally doing if you care so much. I don’t care so I have as big a carbon footprint as possible.

However at my mountain retreat, I am 100% off grid. Can you say that?
 
What are you personally doing if you care so much. I don’t care so I have as big a carbon footprint as possible.

However at my mountain retreat, I am 100% off grid. Can you say that?

"mountain retreat" = homeless camp in the woods behind the shopping center.

pn-20100624135202-4jpg-79cfe4cdd78c21fa.jpg
 
While you mock that person, but he can probably fend for himself while you wouldn’t know the first thing about hunting, killing and skinning your own food

I don't know the first thing about digging through grocery store and fast food joint dumpsters for food like you do either, but I was mocking you not him.
 
I don't know the first thing about digging through grocery store and fast food joint dumpsters for food like you do either, but I was mocking you not him.

I have never had to do that, but hey here is an idea.

Let’s you and me head out into the woods for one week.

You can bring a sleeping bag, tent, gun, canteen and a few supplies you can fit in a back pack. no cell phone or communication device whatsoever and let’s see who survives.

I doubt you would last two nights. The big bad animals would scare you too much. Or you would starve to death.
 
With the planet the warmest it's been in the history of modern civilization, the federal government said Friday that "it's extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century."

The contents of the report contradict claims by President Trump and his administration that continually downplay human contribution to climate change and question the ability of scientists to predict its effects.

"For the warming over the last century, there is no convincing alternative explanation supported by the extent of the observational evidence,” the report concluded.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ive-federal-government-report-says/829783001/

Shape Shifter is not allowed to post in this thread

"...extremely likely..."

Well then, I guess that settles the entire debate. :good4u:
 
Back
Top