Roy Moore's attorney holds news briefing

The timing is he is running for the Senate, big city reporters come to town and do a lot of digging, that is the timing and if you want to say it’s politically motivated, then say it. It happens to a lot of candidates, goos investigative reporters find stories.

LOL.

When did you become an expert on local reporting?
 
It's not like it's inconsistent with other things we've heard about Moore & girls, and even his own faulty recollection about dating teenage girls when in his '30's. A lot is stacked against him. Things hit critical mass in situations like this - at some point, a whole lot of people have to be lying for one person to be telling the truth.

Has anyone proven that his recollection "about dating teenage girls when in his '30's is "faulty", little Thingy?
 
Moore ran for governor at least once if not twice. That’s big politics even in AL. And it ‘just now’ comes out he was stalking teens at the mall in the late 70’s—-and the cops were even aware of it.

There’s certainly room for skepticism in that.

Evidently no local paper bothered to seek out dirt on him which seems odd because he was running as a Republican and usually that would be red meat for the media. And, none of the women came forward, nor did the mall worker.
 
Maybe they finally realized they don't want another unethical corrupt rightie in the Senate.

On May 6, 2016, the Alabama Judicial Inquiry Commission (JIC) forwarded a list of six charges of ethical violations by Moore to the Alabama Court of the Judiciary.[SUP][53][/SUP] Moore was suspended from the Alabama Supreme Court pending trial and ruling. Moore faced removal from office over the charges, which were more serious than those which removed him from office in 2003.[SUP][54][/SUP][SUP][55][/SUP] The JIC's complaint charged Moore with violating the Alabama Canon of Judicial Ethics by:[SUP][53][/SUP]

  1. disregarding a federal injunction.
  2. demonstrated unwillingness to follow clear law.
  3. abuse of administrative authority.
  4. substituting his judgment for the judgement of the entire Alabama Supreme Court, including failure to abstain from public comment about a pending proceeding in his own court.
  5. interference with legal process and remedies in the United States District Court and/or Alabama Supreme Court related to proceedings in which Alabama probate judges were involved.
  6. failure to recuse himself from pending proceedings in the Alabama Supreme Court after making public comment and placing his impartiality into question.

Thanks for proving Moore was a very well known and controversial figure in AL lol.

He made his name by placing a monument of the Ten Commandments in the court house. Moore made national news several times. In fact, I’m sure the establishment media loathed him for the Commandments bit.
 
Thanks for proving Moore was a very well known and controversial figure in AL lol.

He made his name by placing a monument of the Ten Commandments in the court house. Moore made national news several times. In fact, I’m sure the establishment media loathed him for the Commandments bit.

How come none of these folks' memories came bubbling to the surface before Jeff Bezos the billionaire's paper sent some shills reporters to Alabama?
 
But, it would have been in the local newspapers 40 years ago when the ban occurred. How did a big outfit like WaPo hear about 40 year old rumors only recently? Just asking.

"Reinhard said the groundwork for the story began when a Washington Post reporter was in Alabama doing some reporting on Moore's supporters. She said that's when their attention was drawn towards "these rumors [that] were emerging that he had relationships with teenage girls."

Reinhard said they spent weeks pursuing leads and that none of the women they spoke to were eager to go public but finally agreed to do so after multiple interviews.

"They did not seek out this attention," Reinhard said. The Post report also said that according to campaign reports none of the women they interviewed donated or worked for the campaigns for Moore's political rivals, including Democrat Doug Jones."

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/w...no-contact-with-the-democrats/article/2640239
 
You have never lived in a small town back in the 70’s, authority figures were often talked about in secret and never mentioned in the media.

You have no idea where anyone lived in the Seventies, cuntwipe, or even if they were alive then.

Your generalizations are opinions, not facts.

What an ass you are.
 
"Reinhard said the groundwork for the story began when a Washington Post reporter was in Alabama doing some reporting on Moore's supporters. She said that's when their attention was drawn towards "these rumors [that] were emerging that he had relationships with teenage girls." Reinhard said they spent weeks pursuing leads and that none of the women they spoke to were eager to go public but finally agreed to do so after multiple interviews. "They did not seek out this attention," Reinhard said. The Post report also said that according to campaign reports none of the women they interviewed donated or worked for the campaigns for Moore's political rivals, including Democrat Doug Jones."[/url]

So they say.
 
It was local representation, now he is contending for the Senate and he is a controversial figure, different ball game.

But, that's like saying the women wouldn't have minded him becoming their governor, but couldn't take the thought of him becoming a senator.
 
I don't believe you. I think you saw the picture when you Googled and mistakenly believed it would prove the signatures match, so you posted it hurriedly.

Otherwise, why would you post it, since it doesn't?

Unbelievable. If you're determined not to believe me then stop asking all these questions. The signatures look very, very similar and the kid who wrote the article is not a handwriting analyst, he's just another conservative shill.
 
I guess the same thread where a lawyer's completely unsubstantiated assertion that there "may" be some sort of discrepancy in the handwriting, but that they need the original to really determine, is repeated as some sort of interesting fact.

Is there any reason why an accused person's attorney should not be able to demand that purported evidence against his client be subjected to impartial, expert examination, little Thingy?
 
Unbelievable. If you're determined not to believe me then stop asking all these questions.

I am prepared to believe facts, Christiecrite.

Not rumors. Not allegations. Not suddenly-recalled reminiscences that seem suspicious in their timing.

And not Y O U, unless you have evidence.

Deal with it.

The signatures look very, very similar and the kid who wrote the article is not a handwriting analyst, he's just another conservative shill.

They look very, very similar to Y O U.

You are no more a board-certified graphologist than the "kid" whose picture Y O U posted as "proof" that the signatures match.


:rofl2:
 
Back
Top