'Clinton people' -'look in the mirror', Russians didn't impact election -Chaffee

And The border wall is getting ready to sneak up on the Democrats like a stealth Bomber in the night, while all of this white noise is keeping liberals distracted the plan and implementation of the border wall is well under way.

The thing about being distracted is, you don't even know you're being distracted, that's why they call it, Distracted :rofl2:
 
I asked you 3 times & you tried to dance & bull shit around it....

You wanna answer now or play more games??
ROFL..i gave you a DETAILED RESPONSE.
the question isn't a "yes or no" -it's a lot of "unknowns" -because of the classifications we do not have access to.

probably the best answer is the Buddhist expression "mu"

http://www.awakin.org/read/view.php?tid=583
Mu means "no thing." Like "quality" it points outside the process of dualistic discrimination. Mu simply says, "no class: not one, not zero, not yes, not no." It states that the context of the question is such that a yes and a no answer is in error and should not be given. "Unask the question" is what it says.
 
ROFL..i gave you a DETAILED RESPONSE.
the question isn't a "yes or no" -it's a lot of "unknowns" -because of the classifications we do not have access to.

probably the best answer is the Buddhist expression "mu"

http://www.awakin.org/read/view.php?tid=583
Mu means "no thing." Like "quality" it points outside the process of dualistic discrimination. Mu simply says, "no class: not one, not zero, not yes, not no." It states that the context of the question is such that a yes and a no answer is in error and should not be given. "Unask the question" is what it says.

In other words you won't answer.

Yes or no would work.

Is Clapper the only one saying it, or is it the entire IC community that you reject?

Do you believe Putin? (Y) or (N)
 
In other words you won't answer.

Yes or no would work.

Is Clapper the only one saying it, or is it the entire IC community that you reject?

Do you believe Putin? (Y) or (N)

ok I'll ask you blackas crap.

from a racist point of view, what is "meddling in the US election" what does that mean?

((crickets))
 
In pother words you won't answer.

Yes or no would work.

Is Clapper the only one saying it, or is it the entire IC community that you reject?

Do you believe Putin? (Y) or (N)
Clapper WROTE THE ASSESSMENT .

Do I believe neocons like Hayden or Brennan?? do you recall those assholes?

Hayden desperately wanted in Iraq, Brennan with his "kill list' that he served up daily to Obama,
and using "signature strikes" to accomplish it - I'm sure you recall this?? Collateral damage and double taps?

WTF would I believe anything these known lying warmongers say??
 
with all of this talk of Russian meddling, Putin said he didn't, and Ive yet to hear a liberal even tell me what meddling is in this case

((crickets))
 
ROFL..i gave you a DETAILED RESPONSE.
the question isn't a "yes or no"

I did not ask you for a fuckin detail, nary a one..........

I asked you to simply answer yes you believe him, or no ,you do not-I don't need all your fuckin excuses, defenses & absurd rationalizations.......

SIMPLE QUESTION=SIMPLE ANSWER...........

Your mind is closed tight when you can't even answer a simple question...

You're unwillingness to accept the consequences of either a yes or a no answer....

This is your wake up call..
 
I did not ask you for a fuckin detail, nary a one..........

I asked you to simply answer yes you believe him, or no ,you do not-I don't need all your fuckin excuses, defenses & absurd rationalizations.......

SIMPLE QUESTION=SIMPLE ANSWER...........

Your mind is closed tight when you can't even answer a simple question...

You're unwillingness to accept the consequences of either a yes or a no answer....

This is your wake up call..
my mind is closed tight? -yet you won't look at the aspects that make such an
answer really impossible to give unless it's driven by knee jerk partisanship?

You do understand all I can see is the public assessment,and not the 'meat on the bones' Classified one.
Nor can I see any of the reports that drove the assessment?

Why is it you believe a yes-no answer is even possible without seeing the evidence?
 
my mind is closed tight? -yet you won't look at the aspects that make such an
answer really impossible to give unless it's driven by knee jerk partisanship?

You do understand all I can see is the public assessment,and not the 'meat on the bones' Classified one.
Nor can I see any of the reports that drove the assessment?

Why is it you believe a yes-no answer is even possible without seeing the evidence?

Oh, no, I knew it would not be possible for you, either answer would be life changing... Thus, why I asked it.......

There is nothing further to discuss.. One day when you comeback to the real world, PM about it........
 
Oh, no, I knew it would not be possible for you, either answer would be life changing... Thus, why I asked it.......

There is nothing further to discuss.. One day when you comeback to the real world, PM about it........
either answer would be pure speculation on my part.
There is nothing to PM because I cannot judge the conclusions by the IC, since I can't see the evidence
 
Back
Top