cawacko
Well-known member
As they should. That should be coming internally.
Thoughts and Prayers = Deplorable
- Thread starter cawacko
- Start date
As they should. That should be coming internally.
They will certainly be looked at from without. There will be lawsuits, legislation, the command structure above prob at direction of the joint chiefs down.
nope. this is 100% my original work. It looks like that site stole the same post I made on reddit.
I have no clue how they got that but this is 100% mine and I have been posting this same copy pasta on JPP for years.
Well, have at them. Looks to be 2013 or so. And it appears from here, given the way you set it up and it's verbatim, you took it from there. You got some preface directed at me, and then it takes up from the graph there
without any indication of having been lifted. So you either have a photographic memory, or it was taken by you from there, or taken by you from reddit or some source of your own that you have maintained for many years.
You forgot to reveal to me that you were recycling your own old posts with your snarky "cute" comment.
Anyway, I do't think there is an argument that many in Islam are not intolerant. Backward ass is better description. Like 13th century minded. I'll see if I can tamp down on those numbers somehow, but I'm more concerned with knowing
how many Muslims think that Islam should engage in violent terrorist jihad against the west. Or more simply, what is the percentage of terrorists. We aren't going to get hurt by Muslims stoning people who leave Islam in Nigeria.
Last edited:
listen you fucking idiot, this is MY WORK. I have posted it many places on the internet. Go look at that site in greater depth. It's some rando spammy site. I don't know how they got my work but it is MINE. I created it. It's copypasta I have made and reposted many times on this site and elsewhere on the internet.
The article is exactly what I noted, you know a person can do two things at once, "pray" for the victims while recognizing the issue of guns, it doesn't have to be one or the other, the President himself did it after the truck killings in NYC, while he was asking for "prays and thoughts" he also immediately bought up immigration
You've fallen for the framing of the author
cawacko
Well-known member
Again, you're choosing to see what you want to see and you're choosing not to see the attacking of people wishing prayers. That's your right but we saw the results in the last election.
And another, no one is mocking anyone for saying prayers, what they're doing is pointing out that when it is guns, all conservatives echo is "prayers and thoughts," but in other situations as the NYC truck incident it was "prayers and thoughts" while immediately bringing up immigration. Why not the same with guns?
What should be done, first off recognize that it is a problem rather than peddling lame explanations to deflect away from the issue would be a major start. If up to me, treat guns as we do autos, same requirements, liscenses, and insurance requirements
cawacko
Well-known member
And what would that do? Someone taking a test to prove they can shoot accurately is going to be less likely to kill someone or go on a spree?
Last election has nothing to do with it, it's about a sophomoric article in the WSJ attempting to shift the focus off of guns to a cultural realm that conservatives will buy, prayer, and in doing such the author misrepresented legitimate criticism by framing the content
Not my fault you bought it, you were what the author had in mind when he authored the article, played to your predisposition on the topic
Not shoot accurately, but understand guns and gun owners' responsibility, which along with the other hurdles eliminates some of the nut jobs from pursing guns, and no, it, or anything is going to prevent all mass shootings
Superfreak
Verified User
Driving is a privilege, Owning guns is a right
you don't require a license to vote, yet that too has great repercussions.
Also... how does having a license (vs. background check) stop these events from happening? How does having insurance stop it?
cawacko
Well-known member
I voted for Gary Johnson and live in San Francisco. San Francisco is about the opposite of rural working class America. You obsess on guns and thus choose not to see how people respond when being ripped for saying thoughts and prayers. It is a perfect example of why Trump won over white working class voters.
cawacko
Well-known member
So you think some nut job will just give up their pursuit of a mass killing because they have to go through a number of hurdles to get a (legal) weapon?
Someone from the gov't is going to lecture you: "if you own this it is your responsibility not to shoot people"?
Superfreak
Verified User
No, its going to make sure the nuts are properly trained in how to shoot most effectively.
cawacko
Well-known member
No, its going to make sure the nuts are properly trained in how to shoot most effectively.
Seriously, that's what I was thinking as well.
Fuck you idiot. What about, "then have at them" did you not understand? Anyway I learned a new word: copypasta
copypasta
A derogatory term for forum posts which contain a direct or nearly direct copy-and-paste of memes, posts from older forum discussions, or other material, often accompanied by an attempt to pass off the contents as new and original.
Yep, exactly what you did.
Amazing how little some conservatives know about the very Constitution they are so famous for quoting, no Constitutional right is absolute, none, all them can, and are, limited, even Scalia explained that in the Huller case
Nothing is going to totally eliminate mass murders, but the more hurdles you erect to gun access you sure as hell can have an effect upon it
And voter ID fraud isn't even applicable since America doesn't have a problem with voter ID fraud, it is nearly as rare as winning the Powerball lottery
Pursuit, no, but instances where the dimwit who has the gun laying around the house and has a beef with his boss might be limited
cawacko
Well-known member
what you are proposing is a joke however. Not saying you are a lawmaker but for as much as you talk about the issue that's all you've come up with?