Trump Commerce Sec failed to disclose business ties to Putin. Swamp fuller than ever.

Last time I checked we need to have business ties to every country, good and bad.

Obama and Hillary were the ones so proud of the "Russian Reset", what a short memory liberals have.
 
Getin the ring said:
Last time I checked we need to have business ties to every country, good and bad.

Obama and Hillary were the ones so proud of the "Russian Reset", what a short memory liberals have.
Click to expand...

You know so well that this has nothing to do about business ties, and everything about corruption to the highest levels. Every single member of this administration seems to have some Russian tie that they forget to mention to congress or just plain lie about, as Sessions has done.
 
floridafan said:
You know so well that this has nothing to do about business ties, and everything about corruption to the highest levels. Every single member of this administration seems to have some Russian tie that they forget to mention to congress or just plain lie about, as Sessions has done.
Click to expand...

so you naming JUST ONE, should not be a problem

((crickets))
 
floridafan said:
Now you are making excuses for him. Whats worse it seems to be infecting the entire administration, with an Attorney General who lied about his relationships
Click to expand...
ya ya "da Russians". it was always a nothingburger. "ties to the Russians"

Manafort was a lobbyist for the Ukraine's Party of Regions
Flynn was a bit more contorted - I know he went to a dinner Putin was attending

Papadopolis (sp) was trying to set up meetings, but was unsuccessful- he was specifically brushed off

What you Russiaphobes don't get is that the oligarchy in Russia is the power in Russia-
not stock markets, or corps.
You have to play with the oligarchs themselves to do any real business there.

The Dems hype this shit up in a desperate attempt to show collusion with Rusians to
steal the election.
It was always complete crap. the first excuse the Clintonistas cooked up in their postmortem was
"da Russians". you idjits lapped it up because you wanted it to be so
 
anatta said:
ya ya "da Russians". it was always a nothingburger. "ties to the Russians"

Manafort was a lobbyist for the Ukraine's Party of Regions
Flynn was a bit more contorted - I know he went to a dinner Putin was attending

Papadopolis (sp) was trying to set up meetings, but was unsuccessful- he was specifically brushed off

What you Russiaphobes don't get is that the oligarchy in Russia is the power in Russia-
not stock markets, or corps.
You have to play with the oligarchs themselves to do any real business there.

The Dems hype this shit up in a desperate attempt to show collusion with Rusians to
steal the election.
It was always complete crap. the first excuse the Clintonistas cooked up in their postmortem was
"da Russians". you idjits lapped it up because you wanted it to be so
Click to expand...

There is no need to change ID's my dear, we all know just who you are. I wonder if this would be happening in a democratic administration if you would be so forgiving of corruption. Good to see that you were able to mention Clinton, but not Obama? Either way its all but over, soon the fat lady will be singing.
 
floridafan said:
There is no need to change ID's my dear, we all know just who you are. I wonder if this would be happening in a democratic administration if you would be so forgiving of corruption. Good to see that you were able to mention Clinton, but not Obama? Either way its all but over, soon the fat lady will be singing.
Click to expand...
if this was happening because of Russiaphobia/ sure i'd be saying how stupid it all is.

Disclosure violations are a dime a dozen, especially when people have large holdings-
the point is it's a process/on paper crime, nothing nefarious having to do with "da Russians"

None of this would make one iota of difference except for Russiaphobia
 
anatta said:
if this was happening because of Russiaphobia/ sure i'd be saying how stupid it all is.

Disclosure violations are a dime a dozen, especially when people have large holdings-
the point is it's a process/on paper crime, nothing nefarious having to do with "da Russians"

None of this would make one iota of difference except for Russiaphobia
Click to expand...

Just what is Russiaphobia?
 
floridafan said:
This has nothing to do with anything done in the 90's, its corruption that has been ongoing since trump began seeking the Presidency. With that said, I am sure the prosecutor will be turning up other crimes well before then.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Podesta seems a little nervous about that.
 
floridafan said:
2 indictments, 1 guilty plea and how many lies to Congress have we seen, and lots more to follow.
Click to expand...

The indictments had nothing to do with collusion. And again, the only one acting nervous about it is Podesta.

These hardly qualify as facts of collusion. Ironically, the only fact-based Russian collusion that affected the election was done by democrats through a shady intermediate.

It’s a fact Russians colluded, after all.
 
anatta said:
show me where the Trumps "attempt to have Russians influence our election?"
Oh that's right there is none to show
Click to expand...
Why? Your denial is so deep, it’s a waste of time. Trumps asking Russia openly to find Hillary’s emails was asking a foreign entity to get involved and you probably think he was just joking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top