White House OKs report warning climate change caused by humans?!!

signalmankenneth

Verified User
Part-WAS-Was8930739-1-1-1.jpg

The smog-shrouded Los Angeles skyline is seen in this file photo from May 31, 2015. The latest US report says this current period in time is "the warmest in the history of modern civilization" (AFP Photo/MARK RALSTON)

Washington (AFP) - The US government released Friday a major scientific report that says climate change is "extremely likely" to be caused by human activity and will get worse without major cuts to carbon emissions.

The findings of the federally mandated report were approved by the White House, even though they are starkly at odds with the position of President Donald Trump, who has labeled global warming a Chinese hoax and named fossil fuel ally Scott Pruitt to head the Environmental Protection Agency.

The Climate Science Special Report spans more than 600 pages and is part of a larger report known as the Fourth National Climate Assessment, which is being issued in draft form for public comment.

Based on "a large body of scientific, peer-reviewed research," global annually averaged surface air temperature has increased by about 1.8 Fahrenheit (1.0 Celsius) over the last 115 years (1901–2016), it says.

"This period is now the warmest in the history of modern civilization," said the report, available at science2017.globalchange.gov.

Since the last report of its kind was issued in 2014, "stronger evidence has emerged for continuing, rapid, human-caused warming of the global atmosphere and ocean," the text said.

"It is extremely likely that human activities, especially emissions of greenhouse gases, are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century," the report added, noting there "is no convincing alternative explanation."

It was compiled by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, with contributions from NASA, the Department of Energy and other federal agencies. Co-authors included more than 50 scientists from government agencies, universities and the private sector.

"I am quite confident to say that there has been no political interference in the scientific messages from this report," co-lead author David Fahey, director of the chemical sciences division at NOAA, told reporters on a conference call.

"I think whatever fears we had were not realized," he added.

"The word interference might have been a threat, but it never materialized. This report says what the scientists wanted to say."

- Worse effects ahead -
After examining long-term climate records and data going back thousands of years, the report said that in the modern era, "average temperatures in recent decades over much of the world have been much higher, and have risen faster during this time period than at any time in the past 1,700 years or more."

By the end of the century, "without major reductions in emissions, the increase in annual average global temperature relative to preindustrial times could reach 9 Fahrenheit (5 Celsius) or more," it said.

Sea level can be expected to rise "several inches in the next 15 years," and one to four feet (30 to 120 centimeters) by century's end, it said.

A global "rise of as much as eight feet by 2100 cannot be ruled out."

And Americans are already experiencing the effects of climate change through heavier rainfall, coastal flooding, drought, more frequent heatwaves and wildfires, and earlier snow melt.

- 'Not new' -
The findings came as no surprise to climate scientists.

"This isn't new," said Peter Gleick, president-emeritus of the Pacific Institute and a member of the US National Academies of Science.

"This is news only because Trump couldn't censor it," he said on Twitter.

The Trump administration has repeatedly denied or downplayed the role of fossil fuels in global warming.

EPA chief Pruitt shocked scientists earlier this year when he argued in a media interview that carbon dioxide was not a primary contributor to global warming.

However, the White House cleared the report for release, NOAA said.

NOAA said the report "serves as the foundation for efforts to assess climate-related risks and inform decision-making about responses."

The findings do not contain policy recommendations, but serve to inform future strategies.

The Union of Concerned Scientists senior climate scientist, Rachel Licker, said "the American public must hold legislators and policy-makers accountable for taking action commensurate with the problem."

Democratic Senator Al Franken of Minnesota and eight of his colleagues this week sent a letter to Trump asking "what safeguards are in place to ensure that the National Climate Assessment and the Climate Science Special Report give fair and accurate summations of the latest climate science without political interference."

The senators also asked how the Trump Administration plans to address the report's findings.

By Jean-Louis Santini

2c41ac8fe7047d4d2532c4c0cf464a89_L.jpg
 
No political influence over this report devoid of fact.

What a line a crap, and now the truth , "the NCA4, as it's known, is the nation's most authoritative assessment of climate science. The report's authors include experts from leading scientific agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NASA and the Department of Energy, as well as academic scientists."

Time for you to get back to your radio, Sean, Bill, Glenn or Rush ought to up shortly
 
What a line a crap, and now the truth , "the NCA4, as it's known, is the nation's most authoritative assessment of climate science. The report's authors include experts from leading scientific agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NASA and the Department of Energy, as well as academic scientists."

Time for you to get back to your radio, Sean, Bill, Glenn or Rush ought to up shortly

The '90's called bro...
 
What a line a crap, and now the truth , "the NCA4, as it's known, is the nation's most authoritative assessment of climate science. The report's authors include experts from leading scientific agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NASA and the Department of Energy, as well as academic scientists."

Time for you to get back to your radio, Sean, Bill, Glenn or Rush ought to up shortly

NOAA? They've been shown to fabricate.
I listen to Rush occasionally, really like 'Tom Sawyer.
 
Washington (AFP) - The US government released Friday a major scientific report that says climate change is "extremely likely" to be caused by human activity and will get worse without major cuts to carbon emissions.

The findings of the federally mandated report were approved by the White House, even though they are starkly at odds with the position of President Donald Trump, who has labeled global warming a Chinese hoax

Holy fuck, this shit is hilarious!

I've been telling you dudes for years......even the deniers don't believe their own bullshit. At this point, they are just emotionally invested in denial and would rather see harm come to their grandkids than admit they were wrong to anonymous people on the internets.
 
What a line a crap, and now the truth , "the NCA4, as it's known, is the nation's most authoritative assessment of climate science. The report's authors include experts from leading scientific agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NASA and the Department of Energy, as well as academic scientists."

Self-proclaimed experts, anchovies?

Authoritative according those same self-proclaimed experts, anchovies?

Let the forum know when you take the warmist hysteria seriously enough to eschew all non-green conveniences, anchovies.

Oh, that's right, you won't - because you don't believe the BS either. Do you, anchovies?
 
We think that of every generation past but you are correct (although we may be agreeing for different reasons)

I don't really subscribe to AGW. I think it MIGHT be true, but I think it's impossible to know or prove regardless. I think environmentalists make a mistake by focusing on it.

We're just not good to the environment, any way you look at it. Very little of our planning & development is really done w/ long-term sustainability in mind. We're a short-sighted species for the most part.
 
As the great Freeman Dyson says, if the government is paying for 'research' then don't be surprised if politics is intrinsically linked. Classic case of who pays the piper calls the tune.

I can see the climate alarmists here creaming their jeans, but that report is chock full of Doomsday scenarios which the writers must know are manifestly grossly exaggerated. It is basically a manifesto for even more funding of climate research. Why does this even exist anyway, is it attempting to supplant the IPCC, which at least has begun to realise the bogeyman isn't going to call after all? Nobody actually believes that the RCP 8.5 scenario, aka business as usual, in the AR5 report is even remotely likely to happen.

2017 National Climate Assessment: A Self-Falsifying Prophecy?

There has been some recent“buzz”about the upcoming Fourth National Climate Assessment (NC4), including some moonbat conspiracy theories that the Trump administration will try to suppress or otherwise interfere with the scientific integrity of the report. The New York Times has already been forced to essentially retract such a claim in a recent article.

If NC4 actually builds upon 2014’s NC3, EPA Administrator Pruitt’s Red Team will have even more material to work with.

Read more: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/08/14/2017-national-climate-assessment-a-self-falsifying-prophecy/

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top