Well, we know it wasn't a "fat guy with a computer" nor "China,"

archives

Verified User
"The U.S. Justice Department has gathered enough evidence to charge six members of the Russian government in the hacking of Democratic National Committee computers before the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday"

"If the case is brought by federal prosecutors, it would pinpoint the specific Russian military and intelligence hackers behind the attack on the DNC and the emails of John Podesta"

"The hacking investigation, conducted by cybersecurity experts, predates the appointment in May of federal special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee the probe of alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 election"

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...ssian-officials-in-dnc-hack-wsj-idUSKBN1D21MI

Getting harder and harder to tweet that the investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 election are a witch hunt
 
"The U.S. Justice Department has gathered enough evidence to charge six members of the Russian government in the hacking of Democratic National Committee computers before the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday"

"If the case is brought by federal prosecutors, it would pinpoint the specific Russian military and intelligence hackers behind the attack on the DNC and the emails of John Podesta"

"The hacking investigation, conducted by cybersecurity experts, predates the appointment in May of federal special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee the probe of alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 election"

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...ssian-officials-in-dnc-hack-wsj-idUSKBN1D21MI

Getting harder and harder to tweet that the investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 election are a witch hunt

Either way, what got hacked was all true.
 
Which means what exactly?

It means every piece of information that was put out there about the DNC and Podesta was accurate. No lies. It exposed them for what they are. Crooks. Personally I could care less how that information got out there. For any political party.
 
It means every piece of information that was put out there about the DNC and Podesta was accurate. No lies. It exposed them for what they are. Crooks. Personally I could care less how that information got out there. For any political party.

The actual content within the Emails was nothing, the manner inwhich the right wing media framed the it was the impression you obviously accepted

And "how the information" got out there is what is important, as shown above, it was part of an orchestrated espionage effort of a foreign Nation to interfere in our election process
 
The actual content within the Emails was nothing, the manner inwhich the right wing media framed the it was the impression you obviously accepted

And "how the information" got out there is what is important, as shown above, it was part of an orchestrated espionage effort of a foreign Nation to interfere in our election process

I will respectfully disagree. That is what cost the Dems more votes that anything I think. That information helped voters make informed choices when voting. The more information like that available, the better.
 
I will respectfully disagree. That is what cost the Dems more votes that anything I think. That information helped voters make informed choices when voting. The more information like that available, the better.

Sure it effected the outcome, which means Russia effected the outcome, regardless of who won, you can't agree Russia directly interfering in our elections is a positive thing
 
Sure it effected the outcome, which means Russia effected the outcome, regardless of who won, you can't agree Russia directly interfering in our elections is a positive thing

That was one of the better spins I have seen in a while! You almost had me agreeing with it. Not bad at all!
 
"The U.S. Justice Department has gathered enough evidence to charge six members of the Russian government in the hacking of Democratic National Committee computers before the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday"

"If the case is brought by federal prosecutors, it would pinpoint the specific Russian military and intelligence hackers behind the attack on the DNC and the emails of John Podesta"

"The hacking investigation, conducted by cybersecurity experts, predates the appointment in May of federal special counsel Robert Mueller to oversee the probe of alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 election"

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...ssian-officials-in-dnc-hack-wsj-idUSKBN1D21MI

Getting harder and harder to tweet that the investigations into Russian interference in the 2016 election are a witch hunt

how do you know none of them were fat?......
 
The actual content within the Emails was nothing, the manner inwhich the right wing media framed the it was the impression you obviously accepted

And "how the information" got out there is what is important, as shown above, it was part of an orchestrated espionage effort of a foreign Nation to interfere in our election process

but if was nothing, Hilliary would have gotten elected, right?......
 
Back
Top