How many eggs do Republucans have in the Trump Basket?

Evolution existed before the word 'evolution' came about. Do you even know what socialism is, and how it pertains to the government?

Evolution is not a human construct. If our government was truly socialist, then it wouldn't allow citizens to have any control over the private sector. We would have a situation like Medieval Europe, where governments determined who could work in which sector, and under what circumstances.
 
By the women (and men) taking some actual responsibility for them. Kind of like parents.

Funny that you put men in there, when men don't have the equipment to carry children. You live in a fantasy world. In the real world, women have unwanted pregnancies. Thousands -- tens of thousands -- of women and children are raped every year. You want these 'women' to be forced into slavery. There is no alternative to your viewpoint without allowing reproductive rights.
 
Evolution is not a human construct. If our government was truly socialist, then it wouldn't allow citizens to have any control over the private sector. We would have a situation like Medieval Europe, where governments determined who could work in which sector, and under what circumstances.

Fortunately human language is not bound by linear time, and is often retroactive in its terminology.
 
Funny that you put men in there, when men don't have the equipment to carry children. You live in a fantasy world. In the real world, women have unwanted pregnancies. Thousands -- tens of thousands -- of women and children are raped every year. You want these 'women' to be forced into slavery. There is no alternative to your viewpoint without allowing reproductive rights.

You can rationalize cold-blooded killing all day long; it doesn't remove the blood from your hands. I mentioned men, because of how many deadbeats there are running around in the world, lacking the character to stay with the mother once they find-out that she is pregnant.
 
You can rationalize cold-blooded killing all day long; it doesn't remove the blood from your hands.

You can rationalize slavery all day long. I place higher value on the lives of sentient beings first, since their rights are at stake. And women should have the choice over men, since 'God' gave HER the equipment, not the man.

I mentioned men

As a red herring.
 
If Trump turns out to be as crooked and colluding as his detractors say he is, what is left of the Republican party? How can they possibly rebuild from this? It seems like all of the Republicans' hopes and dreams for at LEAST a generation depend on Trump being a straight shooter.

Good luck!

:awesome:
lol.....canookian is counting chickens he's hatching from Trump's eggs.......
 
You can rationalize slavery all day long. I place higher value on the lives of sentient beings first, since their rights are at stake. And women should have the choice over men, since 'God' gave HER the equipment, not the man.



As a red herring.

So, you don't have a problem with deadbeats? I suppose you must relate well to their courage. And you being the leftist, why mention God?
 
By the way, I'm still waiting for a list of non-political conservative victories from the past 50-60 years. Lets have it.
 
So, you don't have a problem with deadbeats?

Sure I do. I can only control myself, and fight for the rights of people who need them. Women are first on the list. Why do you fight for the rights of rapists?

I suppose you must relate well to their courage.

And you the rapist, if we follow through with your comparison.

And you being the leftist, why mention God?

The anti-choicers often hide behind God, since that is where they derive their morality. They need a book to teach them how to behave proper. Are you this brand of conservative?
 
Sure I do. I can only control myself, and fight for the rights of people who need them. Women are first on the list. Why do you fight for the rights of rapists?



And you the rapist, if we follow through with your comparison.



The anti-choicers often hide behind God, since that is where they derive their morality. They need a book to teach them how to behave proper. Are you this brand of conservative?

So, you think that men who abandon women are rapists?

I don't bother much to discuss religion with leftists, except to point out that this isn't Jacobin France or Bolshevik Russia, so you won't be abolishing it in America anytime soon.
 
Well, Trumpism is a cultural/nationalist movement, not an economic one. What is really left of the Republican party, and who will be left to build it when Trump is revealed to be a total fraud at best? The two major pillars of the Republican party post-Reagan (neo-libs and neocons) are just about dead, and the libertarian Tea Party wing is represented by Rand Paul almost entirely.

The far distant future is probably some form of socialism, but until then there will be a balance between government intervention (socialism) and free market capitalism. You say socialism is a failure, but lets be clear that modern capitalism has never been implemented without an equal measure of socialism.

As I read Rand Paul, I mistakenly registered Ayn Rand in my head for a moment (wake n bake weekend) which instantly reminded me of the funniest thing I saw this week.

134503.jpg
 
non-political conservative victories

lol.....what is a "non-political conservative" victory......is that like a non-football Super Bowl victory?........a non-sex orgasm?......please explain........everything lib'ruls and conservatives do is political.......
 
So, you think that men who abandon women are rapists?

I think men who rape women are rapists. Why can't you debate the point?

I don't bother much to discuss religion with leftists, except to point out that this isn't Jacobin France or Bolshevik Russia, so you won't be abolishing it in America anytime soon.

I don't want to abolish religion, although government absolutely needs to be secular. And if you are religious... well, I guarantee you don't want to debate me. I'm more well versed in religion than I am in political terminology, and on both scores you are coming up the loser.
 
that's a very simplistic way of thinking. Much of the GOP establishment is very publicly against trump, if not privately. There are tons of nevertrumpers. It is true that trump is slowly consolidating the republican party, but that's not over yet. Trump is an outsider, the GOP is its own entity. They have very separate and distinct philosophies. Most of the GOP are neo-cons and globalists. Trump is a nationalist and protectionist. The GOP was largely in support of the TPP, trump was not. etc.

Trump may very well take over the GOP and convert it, but they are not one in the same.

The main point is that Trump is redefining the GOP itself.

The party itself already seems lost, less than a year in. After 4 years, it won't be recognizable - which I know is what some (if not many) on the right want.

I can't help but think there will ultimately be a lot of regret for this. It's hard to see the new "Trumpian" party build the kind of lasting coalition that would be needed for real change. But who knows. I've been wrong before, right?
 
lol.....what is a "non-political conservative" victory......is that like a non-football Super Bowl victory?........a non-sex orgasm?......please explain........everything lib'ruls and conservatives do is political.......

A political victory is easily achieved through your standard hoodwinking. I'm talking about victories as far as culture and civil and human rights are concerned. It could easily be argued that Trumpism is one final backlash at the monumental victories liberalism has achieved in these areas.
 
Ok. What does that mean from a Republican/Democrat perspective? You were talking political party's in your OP.

To your point capitalism is progressive and socialism and communism were shown to be failures. Progress is good

No it's not.
 
I think men who rape women are rapists. Why can't you debate the point?



I don't want to abolish religion, although government absolutely needs to be secular. And if you are religious... well, I guarantee you don't want to debate me. I'm more well versed in religion than I am in political terminology, and on both scores you are coming up the loser.

There's nothing to debate if you don't even know what a particular political term means. Generally, the debate is over the merits of a particular idea, properly understood.
 
Back
Top