Why we're now seeing a upswing of attention on candidate Clinton,

archives

Verified User
Lack of any legislative achievements, Hurricane fiascos, schism in the Party ranks, dissing Gold Star widow, ratings in the toilet, blunder after blunder, what better way to deflect and reaffirm the base but than regurgitating Clinton "scandals?"

Problem with the attempt is that it is old, it gets it expected endorsement and play on Fox and with the radio demogogues, the usual Congressman make their phony moralism appeals, and the conservatives eat it up, but it puts the rest of the Nation to sleep. Last year's scapegoats don't apply anymore, been there, done that

It does show the President is getting desperate if the best he can do is relive last year's election
 
Lack of any legislative achievements, Hurricane fiascos, schism in the Party ranks, dissing Gold Star widow, ratings in the toilet, blunder after blunder, what better way to deflect and reaffirm the base but than regurgitating Clinton "scandals?"

Problem with the attempt is that it is old, it gets it expected endorsement and play on Fox and with the radio demogogues, the usual Congressman make their phony moralism appeals, and the conservatives eat it up, but it puts the rest of the Nation to sleep. Last year's scapegoats don't apply anymore, been there, done that

It does show the President is getting desperate if the best he can do is relive last year's election

She will declare shortly so as to claim that she can not be prosecuted as this would entail undo election restriction.............She wants to bake cookies but cant, she should hang herself for her own good at this juncture
 
She will declare shortly so as to claim that she can not be prosecuted as this would entail undo election restriction.............She wants to bake cookies but cant, she should hang herself for her own good at this juncture

Thanks for proving my point, nothing gets the conservatives going like reliving the Clinton conspiracies

I'm going help you out, Clinton doesn't matter anymore, she didn't win, she is history, you can rest easy at night because she will never be a candidate again for anything, then again, maybe you and the other conservatives really do need her to define yourself, what would your world be like without a Clinton to hate
 
You're still obsessed that Clinton hasn't disappeared yet?

You could start a thread and discuss what's going on internally with Democrats and them wanting Bernie to officially join the party and him not doing it and what that means for his movement and the party going forward.
 
No doubt about it.

I don't remember Romney or McCain even being mentioned all that much after Obama won both times. Certainly, there weren't daily threads about them.
 
Lack of any legislative achievements, Hurricane fiascos, schism in the Party ranks, dissing Gold Star widow, ratings in the toilet, blunder after blunder, what better way to deflect and reaffirm the base but than regurgitating Clinton "scandals?"

Problem with the attempt is that it is old, it gets it expected endorsement and play on Fox and with the radio demogogues, the usual Congressman make their phony moralism appeals, and the conservatives eat it up, but it puts the rest of the Nation to sleep. Last year's scapegoats don't apply anymore, been there, done that

It does show the President is getting desperate if the best he can do is relive last year's election


So the fact that she lost makes her potential crimes irrelevant?

That she is now guilty of that which you accuse Trump means we should just overlook it?

Seems to me your OP shows that you know she is guilty as sin and are just trying to sweep it under the rug. Look you brought this on yourselves. We told you last year there was nothing to this whole "Trump/Russian conspiracy" thing. We told you there would be blowback. We told you that if anyone conspired with Russians it was democrats. But did you listen? Nope.

Now you are going to pay the price.

BTW, do you think it was in America's interests for Obama to give Russia access to our uranium?
 
Thanks for proving my point, nothing gets the conservatives going like reliving the Clinton conspiracies

I'm going help you out, Clinton doesn't matter anymore, she didn't win, she is history, you can rest easy at night because she will never be a candidate again for anything, then again, maybe you and the other conservatives really do need her to define yourself, what would your world be like without a Clinton to hate

If that were true and Democrats Al Franken and Chuck Schumer believed that, then they would not have politely told Cliton to shut the fuck up and go away
 
No doubt about it.

I don't remember Romney or McCain even being mentioned all that much after Obama won both times. Certainly, there weren't daily threads about them.

Neither of them won the popular vote. Neither of them claimed they were cheated and should have been President. Neither of them wrote a book saying they were cheated and went on a national book tour.
 
You're still obsessed that Clinton hasn't disappeared yet?

You could start a thread and discuss what's going on internally with Democrats and them wanting Bernie to officially join the party and him not doing it and what that means for his movement and the party going forward.

She pretty much has, other than a requested quote or two on current events, you don't see her much
 
So the fact that she lost makes her potential crimes irrelevant?

That she is now guilty of that which you accuse Trump means we should just overlook it?

Seems to me your OP shows that you know she is guilty as sin and are just trying to sweep it under the rug. Look you brought this on yourselves. We told you last year there was nothing to this whole "Trump/Russian conspiracy" thing. We told you there would be blowback. We told you that if anyone conspired with Russians it was democrats. But did you listen? Nope.

Now you are going to pay the price.

BTW, do you think it was in America's interests for Obama to give Russia access to our uranium?

Fact is she isn't has "guilty" of anything other than her role in your inneundos, and if she did something illegal she'll be dealt with, fine, but none of that has anything to do with what is occurring now

Your living in a world of inneundo, we've seen it the last nine years, lot of rhetoric, zero consequences, and now your just regurgitating the same crap over and over again, it hit the point of diminishing returns a long time ago
 
Fact is she isn't has "guilty" of anything other than her role in your inneundos, and if she did something illegal she'll be dealt with, fine, but none of that has anything to do with what is occurring now

Your living in a world of inneundo, we've seen it the last nine years, lot of rhetoric, zero consequences, and now your just regurgitating the same crap over and over again, it hit the point of diminishing returns a long time ago

Given what we have learned shouldn't we investigate?


BTW do you think it was in the United States best interest for Obama to transfer 20% of our uranium to Russia?
 
No doubt about it.

I don't remember Romney or McCain even being mentioned all that much after Obama won both times. Certainly, there weren't daily threads about them.
Simple minded people need a boogie lady/man to blame for all their problems.
 
Lack of any legislative achievements, Hurricane fiascos, schism in the Party ranks, dissing Gold Star widow, ratings in the toilet, blunder after blunder, what better way to deflect and reaffirm the base but than regurgitating Clinton "scandals?" Problem with the attempt is that it is old, it gets it expected endorsement and play on Fox and with the radio demogogues, the usual Congressman make their phony moralism appeals, and the conservatives eat it up, but it puts the rest of the Nation to sleep. Last year's scapegoats don't apply anymore, been there, done that It does show the President is getting desperate if the best he can do is relive last year's election

"Lack of any legislative achievements, Hurricane fiascos (sic), schism in the Party ranks, dissing Gold Star widow, ratings in the toilet, blunder after blunder"?

Let's see your evidence for these assertions, anchovies.

Post your proof.

I'll understand if you can't.
 
Simple minded people need a boogie lady/man to blame for all their problems.

It's simple minded to bring up the person many democrats on this board continue to say should be President?

And it's simple minded when many liberal posters continue to say Trump voters got fooled and should have voted for Clinton but it's not ok to talk about Clinton?
 
It's simple minded to bring up the person many democrats on this board continue to say should be President?

And it's simple minded when many liberal posters continue to say Trump voters got fooled and should have voted for Clinton but it's not ok to talk about Clinton?
Oh, I guess you feel like you were included in my assessment, lol
 
No doubt about it.

I don't remember Romney or McCain even being mentioned all that much after Obama won both times. Certainly, there weren't daily threads about them.
Romney had class, he disappeared and McCain went back to the senate to do what he does best... advocate war.
hrc goes on an excuses tour and an excuses book tour knowing full well her no. 1 excuse, da Russians, was propagated by her and illegally. A no class criminal. Not saying that Trump has any class but he's no criminal.
Yet you still worship her.
 
Last edited:
No doubt about it.

I don't remember Romney or McCain even being mentioned all that much after Obama won both times. Certainly, there weren't daily threads about them.

Pretty sure neither kept themselves in the spot light as Clinton is doing with the 'I lost because its everyone else's fault' book tour
 
Back
Top