Senator Flake for Potus

All the blah blah blah disputable BS and opinion aside, you neglected one very important and absolute necessity.

You knowingly elected an INCOMPETENT. He is not capable. He knows nothing. He never demonstrated that he knew anything, at all. Ever. Not fucking once.

You can't DO ANYTHING well, even pursue YOUR MISGUIDED ideas, unless you are good at executing and doing anything. One of those things is BEING LIKED.
You elected an incompetent who you knew most people hated. In POLITICS no less! It wasn't a shrewd, thoughtful decision to elect a hated incompetent.
Votring for him was a fucking middle finger, that's the only reason to vote for a lowly deranged loser like Dump.

You fucking idiot.

I have literally heard some cheerleading Trumpettes state that they voted for, and continue to support Trump because it will make Desh, or whoever, "feel bad".

That is the level of bankruptcy jpp.com conservatives have sunk to.

What is there to defend about Trump? No major legislation instituted, historically low approval ratings, and the hatred and disrespect of almost the entire world outside of thirty million pop pom-waving Trump-a-teers.

I mean, when you really think about it, the last time rightwingers actually passionately and enthusiastically advocated for an actual Republican policy was when they were telling us how invading Iraq would be an excellent adventure.
 
I hate McCain with about as much actual hate I can workup for anyone and double that amount.

we'd all be better of if were never in the Senate -bar that he can't drop dead soon enough.
"Is the head dead yet?" (Don Henley)

So you severely hate a politician who at best has had minimal if any influence on your life?

Take my advice, you really need to get out more, lots more
 
translation: I've made millions bilking my constituency while lying to them about what I do, but I hate trump with a passion so i'll just retire. buh bye.
 
put it this way. everyone knew what Trump was before the election.
He's loud/obnoxious and a grotesque figure at times. Typical repulsive New Yorker.

The thing about him though , is he is dead nails on with re-negotiating NAFA, staying out of the TPP , tax reform,and clipping back the onerous Obama -over-regulation era.

He was even correct about trying to improve relations with Russia,instead of this descent into Cold War 2 madness. Congress FUBAR-ed that up with sanctions, so it has to wait

Do I wish 'someone else" had these ideas?
Sure it would be nice to have a smooother operator -but the problem was the rest of the Republicans that ran
are neocons or Evangelicals. *barf*

Or they were establishment dweebs like !Jeb! Screw all that noise -MAGA is the right agenda for this time.

The alternative in Hillary was warmongering, corrupt, plutocratic grifters/liars.

Trump is the one with the best ideas. The establishment offers nothing

Everyone did know what Trump was, but only a very few fully realized what an amateur he has turned out to be

And those things you listed as being "dead nails," most if not all he has done next to little about other than talk and take photo op Executive Orders
 
It cracks me up when JPP libtards jerk themselves off to RINOs like Flake. Flake took on Trump. Flake lost. BIG LEAGUE. RINOs beware


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
put it this way. everyone knew what Trump was before the election.
He's loud/obnoxious and a grotesque figure at times. Typical repulsive New Yorker.

The thing about him though , is he is dead nails on with re-negotiating NAFA, staying out of the TPP , tax reform,and clipping back the onerous Obama -over-regulation era.

He was even correct about trying to improve relations with Russia,instead of this descent into Cold War 2 madness. Congress FUBAR-ed that up with sanctions, so it has to wait

Do I wish 'someone else" had these ideas?
Sure it would be nice to have a smooother operator -but the problem was the rest of the Republicans that ran
are neocons or Evangelicals. *barf*

Or they were establishment dweebs like !Jeb! Screw all that noise -MAGA is the right agenda for this time.

The alternative in Hillary was warmongering, corrupt, plutocratic grifters/liars.

Trump is the one with the best ideas. The establishment offers nothing

My sentiments almost exactly although not sure about NAFTA and the TPP because I don't know enough about them. I'm an advocate of free trade.
 
All the blah blah blah disputable BS and opinion aside, you neglected one very important and absolute necessity.

You knowingly elected an INCOMPETENT. He is not capable. He knows nothing. He never demonstrated that he knew anything, at all. Ever. Not fucking once.

You can't DO ANYTHING well, even pursue YOUR MISGUIDED ideas, unless you are good at executing and doing anything. One of those things is BEING LIKED.
You elected an incompetent who you knew most people hated. In POLITICS no less! It wasn't a shrewd, thoughtful decision to elect a hated incompetent.
Votring for him was a fucking middle finger, that's the only reason to vote for a lowly deranged loser like Dump.

You fucking idiot.

The only reasonable alternative after the conventions was Johnson. So we end up with hrc or Trump.
 
My sentiments almost exactly although not sure about NAFTA and the TPP because I don't know enough about them. I'm an advocate of free trade.
you know what the TPP was from discussions @DCJ.
it was a bureaucratic nightmare with lawyers adjust for "imbalance" or violations of the agreements.
It was heinous in many aspects

NAFTA is a trade block.
The problem is the return we get on free trade also means our corps take advantage
of it by moving good jobs elsewhere.
NAFTA is sound free trade -it just needs to be re-negotiated so it doesn't disfavor us
 
And you picked wrong.:palm:

Johnson? What do you mean I picked wrong? That was the only correct choice, certainly not the failed physician Jell Stein who believes WiFi causes brain damage in children.
If you mean I picked one of the losers, yes, I picked wrong. Last time I picked a winner was 1988.
 
Johnson? What do you mean I picked wrong? That was the only correct choice, certainly not the failed physician Jell Stein who believes WiFi causes brain damage in children.
If you mean I picked one of the losers, yes, I picked wrong. Last time I picked a winner was 1988.

You picked wrong for all the reasons Corker succinctly and Snowflake so eloquently set forth at length. Your hatred for Hillary is utterly irrational and Trump is better than only Richard Speck, Charles Manson and John Wayne Gayce. Maybe...
 
You picked wrong for all the reasons Corker succinctly and Snowflake so eloquently set forth at length. Your hatred for Hillary is utterly irrational and Trump is better than only Richard Speck, Charles Manson and John Wayne Gayce. Maybe...

Hillary supposedly had this great resume yet has had to apologize for everything she done. Johnson has issues but not like her.
 
I have literally heard some cheerleading Trumpettes state that they voted for, and continue to support Trump because it will make Desh, or whoever, "feel bad".

That is the level of bankruptcy jpp.com conservatives have sunk to.

What is there to defend about Trump? No major legislation instituted, historically low approval ratings, and the hatred and disrespect of almost the entire world outside of thirty million pop pom-waving Trump-a-teers.

I mean, when you really think about it, the last time rightwingers actually passionately and enthusiastically advocated for an actual Republican policy was when they were telling us how invading Iraq would be an excellent adventure.

My absolute number one criticism of trump is that he's a hopeless, incorrigible liar... a 100% slimy, hypocritical, deceitful, forked-tongue lying piece of shit.

And it boggles my mind that anybody could trust a single syllable that falls from his lying lips.
 
You picked wrong for all the reasons Corker succinctly and Snowflake so eloquently set forth at length.
I didn't hear Corker mention Johnson in the vid . I don't think Flake did either.
Your hatred for Hillary is utterly irrational
Possibly but I guess you can be excused for thinking hrc was a rational choice but now after her excuses tour and her excuses book tour??? Really. She's unapologetically revealed herself for what we already knew she was long before her emails exposed her to be. You no longer have any excuses to defend that wench. With noise's permission I'll repost an good opinion piece: https://www.adn.com/opinions/2017/09/23/hillary-clinton-rides-a-carousel-of-excuses/
and Trump is better than only Richard Speck, Charles Manson and John Wayne Gayce. Maybe...
And hrc. What tilted the scale is that he wasn't part of the swamp or the failed political system.
 
Hillary supposedly had this great resume yet has had to apologize for everything she done. Johnson has issues but not like her.
hrc has never apologized for anything if you listen closely. It's "I regret having made that statement" "I misspoke."
The only thing that comes close is her saying that she made the wrong vote for the Iraq debacle. Then she proceded to advocate the Libya debacle which I can't remember her ever even saying she regretted, much less saying it was the wrong decision, even less apologizing for, which she's never done for anything in her turbulent life to my knowledge. reminds me of my wife come to think of it.
 
HRC never apologizes ( and to this day she defends Libya as "smart power".)

apologies are for the little people. Clintons do what they want to because they always could.
they are Big Fish
 
Actually pretty accurate, he was doomed to fade next November, but now he is at least going out on some kind of moral high ground

The McCain thing is just pure hate, hopefully your world isn't accented by such

Anyone who dislikes McCain has a screw loose. Or a lockstep tribal cultist who can't abide other than lockstep commitment to the hard right program, much less someone who dares criticize republicans from within.
 
Back
Top