Before Weinstein....

That there is no equivalence. If it's a rich powerful Democrat doing the nasty, his colleagues tend to look the other way until the evidence becomes overwhelming. If it's a Republican or Conservative, no one looks the other way; in fact you Democrats judge him with scant or uncorroborated evidence.

So did Hillary and the Obamas. They finally issued statements that appear to mean that they think Weinstein is guilty - without due process.

Didn't DEMOCRATS screech about Trump expressing an opinion on an ongoing case not long ago?
 
That there is no equivalence. If it's a rich powerful Democrat doing the nasty, his colleagues tend to look the other way until the evidence becomes overwhelming. If it's a Republican or Conservative, no one looks the other way; in fact you Democrats judge him with scant or uncorroborated evidence.
Only today Quentin Tarantino said that he knew about Weinstein decades ago but said little. Now he claims to regret not speaking up.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
"The Trump thing is made-up bullshit?" So the access Hollywood tape and active legal cases against him in the Courts is all "made up bullshit?"

And has there been any of these individuals who didn't "deny allegations?"

Point being conservatives are on shakey ground bringing up anything remotely related to the topic, both sides have their predators

Is that your way of defending Hollywood? By bringing up something Access Hollywood reported and claiming both sides?

Back to the drawing board for you Legion
 
There was Polanski. Before Polanski there was Mayer. And before Mayer there was Zanuck. And those are just a few of the shit bags. This bullshit has been part of Hollyweird since Hollyweird was built.

Were you this upset about Rodger Alies and Bill O'Riley?
 
The Alies case was settled, since he was fired. O'Reilly is vehemently denying allegations against him. The thing about Trump is made-up bullshit.

So, since Alies's case was settled that makes it okay/

O'Reilly and Weinstein are both denying the claims against them.

Rump bragged about it, how could it be bullshit?
 
That there is no equivalence. If it's a rich powerful Democrat doing the nasty, his colleagues tend to look the other way until the evidence becomes overwhelming. If it's a Republican or Conservative, no one looks the other way; in fact you Democrats judge him with scant or uncorroborated evidence.

O'Reilly was a well known harasser, he publicly settled several cases over the years, and you fuckers still worshiped him, then you elected Rump President, at least the liberals in Hollywood fired Weinstein and prosecuted Polanski.
 
So did Hillary and the Obamas. They finally issued statements that appear to mean that they think Weinstein is guilty - without due process.

Didn't DEMOCRATS screech about Trump expressing an opinion on an ongoing case not long ago?

Trump IS president and head of the Department of Justice!
 
So, since Alies's case was settled that makes it okay/

O'Reilly and Weinstein are both denying the claims against them.

Rump bragged about it, how could it be bullshit?
Quentin Tarantino said he knew about Weinstein decades ago, is he lying as well?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
Quentin Tarantino said he knew about Weinstein decades ago, is he lying as well?

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk

He was lying before when he wasn't talking about it. Now, it seems he's telling the truth.

What are you even trying to say? Such a knee-jerk rightie defender...
 
"The Trump thing is made-up bullshit?" So the access Hollywood tape and active legal cases against him in the Courts is all "made up bullshit?"

And has there been any of these individuals who didn't "deny allegations?"

Point being conservatives are on shakey ground bringing up anything remotely related to the topic, both sides have their predators

What's the opposite "side" of Hollywood?
 
O'Reilly was a well known harasser, he publicly settled several cases over the years, and you fuckers still worshiped him, then you elected Rump President, at least the liberals in Hollywood fired Weinstein and prosecuted Polanski.

Unlike you I worship no human being. O'Reilly has hotly contested his accusers. Your bullshit about Trump is meaningless. Two guys in a limo playing "can you top this" is not evidence of harassment, no matter how much you spin it.
 
Weinstein shines a light on everyone who was part of the old paradigm. Tarantino basically voiced it yesterday for the non-offenders - complicit because he had a financial stake, or for fear related to career.

For the offenders, the light is much brighter. The Weinstein scandal is not a good thing for Trump, or Clinton.
 
Unlike you I worship no human being. O'Reilly has hotly contested his accusers. Your bullshit about Trump is meaningless. Two guys in a limo playing "can you top this" is not evidence of harassment, no matter how much you spin it.

Well, there were some accusers there too, Right.

Personally, I found them to be credible. Why do you think they're not believable, but you believe Weinstein's & Clinton's?
 
It's about Hollywood. This is a Hollywood problem. People keep resorting to Trump as if that means something. He was Hollywood (unless TV shows and Miss America pageants aren't Hollywood anymore.)

Name another industry with the sexual abuse history that Hollywood does
 
Back
Top