USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Umm, no retard, in fact the height helped the shooter greatly.
Your reply, is "essentially" incorrect.

Umm, no retard, in fact the height helped the shooter greatly.

Damn, you are fucking stupid.
And Rune continues to remain on his "rinse and repeat" mode, seeing as how he "essentially" isn't answering and is only responding.
"Essentially" his stupidity knows no limits.
He thinks he is demonstrating his" expertise"...
All he is really demonstrating is his boundless hoplomaniac stupidity...
LMFAO!
Particularly funny in this case since .223 bullets invariably fracture rather than ricochet, even when striking water.
Clueless retard is clueless nevermind that the angle of incidence is far too steep to produce a ricochet when fired from 32 stories.

And what do the fractured pieces do, just lay there or do they act like shrapnel.![]()
Listen idiot.
A .223 round weighs between 55 and 75 grains.
It's destructive force is derived from it's high energy not it's weight.
The high energy is achieved by it's very high rate of speed.
Force (in this case described as energy)
is calculated using the formula mass x velocity squared. Since the velocity is squared ( the number, whatever it may be, is multiplied by itself) the velocity is much more important than the mass in determining destructive force.
Bear in mind, however, that the mass of a .223 is tiny in comparison with even most handgun rounds.
These facts combined with the acuteness of the angle of incidence ( he was shooting downward at approximately a 40 degree angle) mean that whatever "shrapnel" may have occurred would be tiny and, having lost energy to first fragmentation and second reversal of direction would have negligible destructive energy at best.
Listen idiot.
A .223 round weighs between 55 and 75 grains.
It's destructive force is derived from it's high energy not it's weight.
The high energy is achieved by it's very high rate of speed.
Force (in this case described as energy)
is calculated using the formula mass x velocity squared. Since the velocity is squared ( the number, whatever it may be, is multiplied by itself) the velocity is much more important than the mass in determining destructive force.
Bear in mind, however, that the mass of a .223 is tiny in comparison with even most handgun rounds.
These facts combined with the acuteness of the angle of incidence ( he was shooting downward at approximately a 40 degree angle) mean that whatever "shrapnel" may have occurred would be tiny and, having lost energy to first fragmentation and second reversal of direction would have negligible destructive energy at best.
Just "essentially" go away, Rune, adults are talking; because it appears as if your "essentially" saying that every death and wound were from direct hits.![]()
There were lots of ricochets fool, just not many fatal ones.
I'm waiting to see the report on how many rounds he "essentially" fired and how many of them were direct hits, instead of ricochets; because I've got a feeling that the percentage between fired and hit is going to "essentially" be lower then it would normally be expected.
Hope this helps!
![]()
So after all that, you now accept the FACT that some of the murders, could have happened from ricochets; which is exactly what I "essentially" asked.
You're a fucking idiot and I don't mean that in a kind way.
My post that you've been attempting to disprove, failed to do so, and now admit defeat.![]()
It doesn't, I had to simplify it for him as it is, but thanks.

The bump stock allowed Paddock to send more lead in less time killing and maiming many more than would have been possible without it.
The fish stood less of a chance with automatic weapons fire.
BRING BACK THE MODEL-T BECAUSE IT WAS SLOWER! 20 MPH KILLS LESS THAN 75 MPH!
HA HA, HO HO, MODERN TECHNOLOGY HAS GOT TO GO!
I see you intend to continue to remain on your "rinse and repeat" mode, seeing as how you "essentially" aren't answering and are only responding.
Why would I want to do much better??
Are you "essential" on permanent trigger mode, now??![]()
Automatic weapons were designed to kill faster and more efficiently.
Modern cars were not...
Ha ha ho ho you lose.
Bump stocks are not weapons.
HA HA, HO HO, DEBATING LIBERALS IS LIKE PLAYING FAMILY FEUD AGAINST A FAMILY OF RETARDS!
No shit Dick Tracy...
Bump stocks are modifications so that any shit brained semi automatic weapon owner can simulate full auto with their cheap semi auto guns.
Talented semi auto gun owners can, and do, fire their semi auto guns at full auto speeds without any mods...
I suggest you watch the videos so that you can give a more informed response.