Yes.....maybe like an illegal alien who commits a mass murder on behalf of ISIS....something to think about.
Yeah Stench we should all consider your idiotic concerns...

Yes.....maybe like an illegal alien who commits a mass murder on behalf of ISIS....something to think about.

you need to flesh out your arguments to a bit more then Oracle speak. ( because you say so)
we are talking about honoring an ICE detainer. I'm not clear about you are speaking about
https://www.ice.gov/detainer-policy
ICE places detainers on aliens who have been arrested on local criminal charges and for whom ICE possesses probable cause to believe that they are removable from the United States, so that ICE can take custody of the alien when he or she is released from local custody. When law enforcement agencies fail to honor immigration detainers and release serious criminal offenders, it undermines ICE’s ability to protect public safety and carry out its mission.
There is none, but at the same time they can’t stop the Feds either.
ICE can just do their job
Thanks for being on the side of rapists and murderers.
so you are against cooperative law enforcement?
domer and other idiots like to pretend that the states are not required to OBEY federal law......
Maybe they'll start arresting those who are ignoring Federal law; seeing as how Federal law Trumps State law and State law Trumps County law and County law TRUMPS City law.
![]()
10th amendment
silly domer.....the law doesn't require states to perform the duties that the federal government is responsible for......the law requires states to do what the federal law ORDERS them to do.......
Except the Bill of Rights disagrees with you, IDIOT
Truly I'm confused on this conversation. Is it worth reiteration?
Subtract the California economy and US GNP is on par with Sardinia's. Trump can't do shit.

You are happy about a state ignoring federal law?
10th Amendment shit stain.
The states...cannot be compelled to enforce Federal laws.
Maybe every time a bank is robbed, in California; the FBI just puts it on a back burner and get to it, when they can!!
![]()
lol the tenth amendment only applies to powers not granted to the Federal government, immigration policy falls under the enumerated powers of the Congress.
"the states cannot be compelled...to enforce Federal law"...
from the anti-commandeering clause of the 10th Amendment
They are the same rights you posses, dumbfuck. Such as the right to marry the person your choice, dumbfuck. Or equal opportunity in housing, dumbfuck. Or employment, dumbfuck. Or in public accommodation, dumbfuck. Previously, and in many places, still currently denied, dumbfuck.

good lord..did you read this?
How California's Trust Act shaped the debate on the new 'sanctuary state' proposal
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-...ary-state-immigration-20170910-htmlstory.html
I'm still on my first cup of coffee, but I've never seen such a bunch of confusion to dodge ICE detainers?
Why not just cooperate ( although the idea of putting a time limit on a detainer is valid, so locals do not over-hold)
It's clear (illegal) immigrants are driving the agenda, instead of illegals simply being subject to immigrtion law.
The argument is saying illegal activity should be shielded to comply with immigration advocates demands.
Just follow federalism -problem solved, instead of using arcane federalism for these carve outs
LMFAO.
Really idiot?
The Supreme Court disagrees...4 times so far.
God damn you really are an ignorant piece of shit.