California becomes 'sanctuary state' in rebuke of Trump immigration policy

you need to flesh out your arguments to a bit more then Oracle speak. ( because you say so)

we are talking about honoring an ICE detainer. I'm not clear about you are speaking about

Read the fucking OP.
It clearly stated that this does not apply to those convicted of one of 800 crimes.
 
https://www.ice.gov/detainer-policy
ICE places detainers on aliens who have been arrested on local criminal charges and for whom ICE possesses probable cause to believe that they are removable from the United States, so that ICE can take custody of the alien when he or she is released from local custody. When law enforcement agencies fail to honor immigration detainers and release serious criminal offenders, it undermines ICE’s ability to protect public safety and carry out its mission.

10th Amendment shit stain.

The states...cannot be compelled to enforce Federal laws.
 
There is none, but at the same time they can’t stop the Feds either.

ICE can just do their job

Thanks for being on the side of rapists and murderers.

No one claims they can stop ICE from doing their jobs, disingenuous moron.

Why don't you shut the fuck up?
 
10th amendment

Except immigration policy falls under the enumerated powers of the Federal government:


Article 1 Section 8 Clause 4

The Congress shall have power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
 
silly domer.....the law doesn't require states to perform the duties that the federal government is responsible for......the law requires states to do what the federal law ORDERS them to do.......

"the states cannot be compelled...to enforce Federal law"...
from the anti-commandeering clause of the 10th Amendment
 
10th Amendment shit stain.

The states...cannot be compelled to enforce Federal laws.

lol the tenth amendment only applies to powers not granted to the Federal government, immigration policy falls under the enumerated powers of the Congress.
 
lol the tenth amendment only applies to powers not granted to the Federal government, immigration policy falls under the enumerated powers of the Congress.

LMFAO.

Really idiot?

The Supreme Court disagrees...4 times so far.

God damn you really are an ignorant piece of shit.
 
"the states cannot be compelled...to enforce Federal law"...
from the anti-commandeering clause of the 10th Amendment

Those words are not in the 10th Amendment:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Unfortunately for your argument immigration policy IS one of the enumerated powers of the Congress:

Article 1 Section 8 Clause 4

The Congress shall have power to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
 
They are the same rights you posses, dumbfuck. Such as the right to marry the person your choice, dumbfuck. Or equal opportunity in housing, dumbfuck. Or employment, dumbfuck. Or in public accommodation, dumbfuck. Previously, and in many places, still currently denied, dumbfuck.

This is DUMBERS idea of not ranting like a Junior High Schooler. Buy a mirror dumbfuck.

UNHINGED and TRIGGERED!!
:rofl2:
 
good lord..did you read this?
How California's Trust Act shaped the debate on the new 'sanctuary state' proposal
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-...ary-state-immigration-20170910-htmlstory.html
I'm still on my first cup of coffee, but I've never seen such a bunch of confusion to dodge ICE detainers?

Why not just cooperate ( although the idea of putting a time limit on a detainer is valid, so locals do not over-hold)

It's clear (illegal) immigrants are driving the agenda, instead of illegals simply being subject to immigrtion law.
The argument is saying illegal activity should be shielded to comply with immigration advocates demands.

Just follow federalism -problem solved, instead of using arcane federalism for these carve outs

Bill of Rights, dipshit.
It is all or nothing, not buffet style.
 
LMFAO.

Really idiot?

The Supreme Court disagrees...4 times so far.

God damn you really are an ignorant piece of shit.

No the SCOTUS does not disagee and neither does the Constitution, you ever hear of the Civil Rights Act you stupid fuck? Your assertion that Federal Law is not incorporated at the state level is laughably wrong.
 
Back
Top