no more denying 'slippery slopes', they DO exist

USFREEDOM911 said:
So if they decide differently then you hope, you accept that's how Democracy works and you just drop the issue?
Click to expand...

I would think not for me or for you. We vote our representatives & they vote to make laws. If we do not like them we vote in representatives that will work to change the laws. That's how it works, how it's historically worked and how it's supposed to work.
Of course certain interests have come between that core principle but everyone's too busy being sucked into the 'my party vs' your party' to focus on the real problem with our political process.
 
crowonapost said:
I would think not for me or for you. We vote our representatives & they vote to make laws. If we do not like them we vote in representatives that will work to change the laws. That's how it works, how it's historically worked and how it's supposed to work.
Of course certain interests have come between that core principle but everyone's too busy being sucked into the 'my party vs' your party' to focus on the real problem with our political process.
Click to expand...

Wait-wait-wait-wait!!

I could have sworn that you said "...that's how democracy works..." and then welcomed another poster to it!!

Are you saying that what's good for the Goose, isn't good for the Gander; because it's beginning to seem like that.

Why aren't you willing to accept Democracy, when someone votes in a way you don't agree with?

We can discuss your habit of labeling people, while railing against labeling people, at a different time. :good4u:
 
crowonapost said:
Well no shit. that's how democracy works. Different sides go for what they want & then through shit that is based on, I don't know... the fucking constitution they negotiate towards a common ground.

Welcome to Democracy. Guess this is new for you.
Click to expand...

Or we just say no. No compromise on the 2nd Amendment
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So you have nothing to say about the possibility of Congress disappointing you. :good4u:
By the way, THEN is the correct word.

Verb
Verbs have tenses: present, to indicate that an action is being carried out; past, to indicate that an action has been done; future, to indicate that an action will be done.
Click to expand...

Sorry , but no. If the comma after hope was after differently instead "then" could fit correctly as a conditional modifier of the verb "hope". But the sentence would then take on an awkward confused meaning;
" then you hope you accept that's how Democracy works"... Who hopes they accept? It makes little sense.
So if they decide differently then you hope, you accept that's how Democracy works and you just drop the issue?
Click to expand...
By putting the comma after "hope" you link "then" with the first clause of the sentence and you used then for than...
Nice try though for an ignorant fuck like you, pervert.
You either misplaced the comma or misused then for than.
Either way you are an ignorant asshole.
LMFAO!
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
Sorry , but no. If the comma after hope was after differently instead "then" could fit correctly as a conditional modifier of the verb "hope". But the sentence would then take on an awkward confused meaning;
" then you hope you accept that's how Democracy works"... Who hopes they accept? It makes little sense.

By putting the comma after "hope" you link "then" with the first clause of the sentence and you used then for than...
Nice try though for an ignorant fuck like you, pervert.
You either misplaced the comma or misused then for than.
Either way you are an ignorant asshole.
LMFAO!
Click to expand...

This is way to funny.

Buckly can't make a intelligent comment about the situation that was posted; but instead he tries to win points by focusing on spelling and punctuation.

Well, that's probably a good thing; because apparently it's all he has left, seeing as how all of his rants have been destroyed. :D

:truestory:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
This is way to funny.

Buckly can't make a intelligent comment about the situation that was posted; but instead he tries to win points by focusing on spelling and punctuation.

Well, that's probably a good thing; because apparently it's all he has left, seeing as how all of his rants have been destroyed. :D
Click to expand...


It's low hanging fruit, when you are this drunk, pervert.
 
crowonapost said:
You get me thinking. Do you know a state in this country that has gotten rid or ignored the second amendment? Is there one where there are no guns at all?
Click to expand...

A state can't get rid of the 2nd Amendment. Your question is bogus.

Now there are states and locales that attempt to severely restrict gun ownership, and some of them have pretty high crime rates with guns see Chicago and Washington DC

PS when you hear libtardiots say "The US has a hight rate of gun violence" they forget to leave out that the majority of gun deaths are due to suicide. After that is black guys killing other black guys.

Mass shootings like last Sunday? Extremely rare
 
Toxic Titties said:
A state can't get rid of the 2nd Amendment. Your question is bogus.
Click to expand...
Okay. My question may be bogus to you, I'm not trying to illicit an aha moment. It was just an honest question. So we agree, even as best I understand that there is no state depriving anyone of the second amendment. I think that's good. How about you?

Now there are states and locales that attempt to severely restrict gun ownership, and some of them have pretty high crime rates with guns see Chicago and Washington DC
Click to expand...

Yup, I agree. It is a quandary of cities in general. I am honestly not sure of the answer. I assume one is everyone has a gun. Of course not everyone wants to lug around a hand gun in the off chance they get get into a gun fight. I know personally I don't but that's just me.

PS when you hear libtardiots say "The US has a hight rate of gun violence" they forget to leave out that the majority of gun deaths are due to suicide. After that is black guys killing other black guys.
Click to expand...

Yes absolutely, there are a lot of suicides and I find that sad. It's the danger of having a gun around I guess and a moment of deep depression. I'd guess there's a lot more complicated issues with that would need to be unpacked for that.
There is also a collective depression that goes along with poverty and disconnected community that could be unpacked with black guys killing black guys but that too is a large unpacking process.

Mass shootings like last Sunday? Extremely rare
Click to expand...
They are from a certain point of view, they are not every day but they have increased over the years which is also disturbing.
 
Toxic Titties said:
A state can't get rid of the 2nd Amendment. Your question is bogus.

Now there are states and locales that attempt to severely restrict gun ownership, and some of them have pretty high crime rates with guns see Chicago and Washington DC

PS when you hear libtardiots say "The US has a hight rate of gun violence" they forget to leave out that the majority of gun deaths are due to suicide. After that is black guys killing other black guys.

Mass shootings like last Sunday? Extremely rare
Click to expand...

Of course, suicide with a gun is neither violent nor leads to a death.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
All you fucktard liberals who claimed that the slippery slope doesn't exist, eat shit and die.

https://hotair.com/archives/2017/10/05/pelosi-sure-hope-ban-bump-stocks-slippery-slope-gun-control/
Click to expand...


Five short years from disarmament to dictatorship.



ggg4ca5dn9qz.jpg



THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭ THIS IS SOCIALISM - DEMOCRATS WANT TO DISARM YOU - ☭
 
crowonapost said:
Well no shit. that's how democracy works. Different sides go for what they want & then through shit that is based on, I don't know... the fucking constitution they negotiate towards a common ground.

Welcome to Democracy. Guess this is new for you.
Click to expand...

it might be news to you, but congress has long since acknowledged that the shit they do is not within the constitution.
 
Toxic Titties said:
Or we just say no. No compromise on the 2nd Amendment
Click to expand...

what's going to be interesting is their response when thousands say NO MORE!!!! and start shooting back. of course their loyalty is to the state so they will call them godless heathens of evil spawn, but that just makes them targets as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top