Bump stock Bam!

Cry harder, Zappacrite.

BTW, Zappacrite, have you noticed that more loose leftie liberals seem to be using threadbans? Are they cowards who fear your much-vaunted "honest discourse", Zappacrite?



:rofl2:
Years ago I was talking to the owner of Hel Fire Triggers he said in
Several monts he would have a new trigger that had just been approvd by the ATF later I found out ATF reversed their aproval . he went bankrupt
had already invested heavily in the new model trigger . Looks
Like slidefire will have the same resus . that electronic $500.00
Dollar trigger will end up gone? ATF & FEDS hold discression on auto
Rifles j guns.

Sent from my LGMS550 using Tapatalk
 
Someone asked a question of gun enthusiasts in an attempt to have an honest discussion and it was met with nothing but invective and derision.

Thanks for proving my point that gun nuts refuse to discuss common sense gun regulations with any civility.

You think one can have a rational dialogue with liberals when they LIE about the facts? What regulations would have prevented this nut from murdering people at a concert?

I would like YOU and anyone else on the left who has their heads up their asses on the topic to go out and buy a gun and get back to us about how EASY it is.

There is no civility in a debate when the leftist premise is built upon a LIE and their OBVIOUS AGENDA is a total rescission of the second amendment.
 
Nowhere in the post you quoted did I say there was NO regulation of firearms.

This was your outright bullshit claim:

Gun nuts refuse to discuss any common sense regulation of firearms and the GOP repealed the laws that were put in place to keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill.

Unless you are willing to DEFINE what this lunacy about "COMMON SENSE" regulation means, it infers we don't have enough already. I don't give a "F" what YOU think, it is what YOUR SIDE claims.

So what are these COMMON SENSE regulations that would do what ALL the OTHER regulations do not already and would have PREVENTED this tragedy??

Nowhere in ANY of my posts have I stated there was NO regulation of firearms.

Blah, blah, blah.

Naturally that doesn't stop you from lying your ass off about what I said.

Cry harder you idiot.

How bout that? Another Truth Rejector post was just another Truth Rejector lie.

How about that, another whiny stupid strawman filled bloviation from the clueless lying dullard on steroids.

I am all eyes about what this NEW and IMPROVED COMMON SENSE regulations are. Post them for us asswhipe.
 
I asked a question of those more knowledgeable than I about guns, and as is so very typical when discussing anything with the GOP, it was met with nothing but derision.

Stupidity gets met by derision; you should be used to it by now. If you're going to erupt about stuff you know NOTHING about by parroting the leftist line, be prepared for it.

I am waiting to see what COMMON SENSE regulations look like.
 
I asked a question of those who claim to be much more knowledgeable in order to become more knowledgeable and my honest attempt at civil dialogue was met with derision.

Just like ANY attempt at civil discussion of common sense gun regulations is met by GOP derision.

Honest? :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2:

What a whiny pathetic lying dunce you are. Yep, in dumbfuck land where you wallow, you and your fellow LibTards NEVER engage in derision right asshat?
 
Bump stock Bam! Sounds like Congress will be introducing legislation to ban bump stocks, After one was used in the Las Vegas shooting. Do you agree or disagree should bump Stocks the band?

Since the massacre gun stores haven't been able to meet the demand by Hoplomaniacs in search of the elusive "full auto"buying bumpstocks...
They all have "full auto" envy...
 
Well we'll never know now, will we?

Gun nuts refuse to discuss any common sense regulation of firearms and the GOP repealed the laws that were put in place to keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill.

The blood of innocent shooting victims is on the GOP's hands.

What specific laws were repealed that allowed this guy to buy guns which if these certain laws were not repealed he would not have been able to?

Be specific and give citations.
 
We are so lucky the NRA is finally letting us make the first steps toward massacre prevention.
 
Despite having spent a substantial part of his career appearing in gun-toting roles such as cowboys, policemen, gangsters and military men, Richard Widmark disliked firearms and was involved in several gun-control initiatives. In 1976 he stated:

"I know I've made kind of a half-assed career out of violence, but I abhor violence. I am an ardent supporter of gun control. It seems incredible to me that the United States are the only civilized nation that does not put some effective control on guns."

So basically; he was for it before (as long as he made money off of it), but now he's against it. :good4u:
 
Poor Tom.

Tom's usually alright; but he tends to let his feelings get in the way of things, when it comes to how he just knows what America should do.
I'm beginning to believe it's ingrained and thereby; he's genetically upset over losing the "colonies", which has also led him (in the past) to believe that Americans are too patriotic and fly too many flags.

Other then that, he's usually sane.
 
Last edited:
Tom's usually alright; but he tends to let his feelings get in the way of things, when it comes to how he just knows what America should do.
I'm beginning to believe it's ingrained and thereby; he's genetically upset over losing the "colonies", which has also led him (in the past) to believe that Americans are to patriotic and fly to many flags.

Other then that, he's usually sane.



lt0yggaps3qz.jpg
 
The blood on my hands will not be mine if someone tries to hurt me, Zappacrite.

You can choose to be helpless should you ever be in danger, if you like. I decline to join you in victimhood.

The Constitution gives me the right to defend myself, and I gladly embrace that responsibility.

BTW, more loose lefties are using thread bans. Have you noticed?

:rofl2:

Wait a minute.
Does his comment mean that the blood of those who have died from car accidents, is on the hands of the snowflakes, seeing as how they oppose preventive things like requiring every vehicle to be required to have a ignition LOCK OUT device?
 
It's a no brainer. Ban them. It's a scam workaround device. Its like tweaking a molecule on a designer drug to stay ahead of the law.

No, it isn't. It is still 1 shot per pull of the trigger. That's a textbook and legal definition of a semi automatic firearm.
 
Back
Top